Wednesday, the anti-planet Pluto moves into Aquarius. Planet Waves and PWFM are off this week, though here is a compilation of my best work on Pluto entering Aquarius, dating back to 2019.
The entire field of astrology is based upon a geocentric cosmology that only works using the traditional Azimuthal Equidistant Flat Earth map. In the following video I discuss this with Mary at Sea Level, a professional geocentric astrologer and vocal flat earther.
Hi Eric - Love your substack & your take on the stupidity of the C19 story-line/mandates/vaxx etc - & esp appreciate your support for Christine Massey's excellent FOI work- well-done!) but your take on Pluto (& the supposed "planets") needs further research on your part imo.
Just as Christine Massey has been excessively trashed, so has Eric Dubay & others who have provided irrefutable evidence against a spinning, revolving globe earth & spinning planets in an expanding universe, etc. Evidence overwhelmingly indicates that earth is more of a "realm" than a spinning ball.
The constellations have NOT changed in millennia, which points to a stationary, central earth plane.
A critical point always made by those using NASA's planet photos/simulations, is that they are simply inventions > CGI/artists' renderings (such as your use of "Artist’s rendering of the view from Pluto". Eric that means "imaginary" ya know? Made up. Ask yourself, why in our increasingly technocratic world, no REAL PHOTOS FROM SPACE are shown, huh? Because the PTB can't produce them. Space is not "real".
This issue is so much more important than the shape of the earth & speaks to unparalleled deception.
> Mar 20, 2023 - Destroying the Globe with Socratic Questioning - Eric Dubay - 12K views - 1 day ago
Another common question posed by Globe Earthers is, "if the Earth is flat, then why are all the other planets round?" To begin with, the Earth is a plane, not a planet, and by simply adding a "t" on the end modern astronomers have linguistically transformed our Earth plane into a globe spun around the Sun. The word "round" is also deceiving, because most Flat Earthers would agree that the Earth is round like a coin, just not round like a ball. When making this argument online, Globe Earthers will often present a picture of the traditional heliocentric model with eight spherical planets and a Flat Earth among them floating in space. This entire concept is a strawman, however, as no Flat Earthers believe in a flat planet floating in space third from the Sun in a heliocentric solar system.
In NASA's many CGI depictions the planets do indeed appear spherical, but when looking at them for yourself through a telescope or super-zoom camera, it is certainly contestable whether or not the planets are spherical. Every time I have personally observed the planets they look like small, relatively flat, round lights and nothing like huge spherical terra firma worlds. Only in NASA and other "official" space agency footage do the planets appear like three-dimensional globular worlds; in amateur footage they look more like two-dimensional lights, similar to all the other stars. In fact, before they were called "planets," the ancients referred to them as "wandering stars" because they only differed from the other "fixed stars" in their relative motions. They each have their own unique appearance, but none of them look like spherical worlds, even Saturn which appears more like a circular luminary with a halo of light around it.
Ultimately, however, it is completely irrelevant what shape the other planets are when looking to prove the shape of the Earth. Modern astronomers constantly repeat this red herring that I have dubbed the "appeal to the sky" fallacy. Imagine inviting a contractor over to your house to measure the dimensions of your floor and instead they immediately get out their tape-measure and start measuring all the recessed lights in the ceiling! This is exactly what Globe Earthers are doing by claiming to provide scientific proof for the shape of the Earth under our feet by looking at lights in the sky over our head. Like magicians distracting you with one hand while fooling you with the other, globe apologists when asked for empirical, measurable proof of the shape of the Earth beneath their feet, invariably inevitably instead turn their noses up to the sky and start talking about the shape of things up there. But even if all the other planets really were spheres, what on Earth does that have to do with the shape of the Earth?
Common sense rules. Very interesting discussion here, Eric, on astrology & a geocentric world.
Feb 4, 2023 - Geocentric Flat Earth Astrology - Eric Dubay - 180K subscribers - 37,344 views
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNKIOHoPgC8
The entire field of astrology is based upon a geocentric cosmology that only works using the traditional Azimuthal Equidistant Flat Earth map. In the following video I discuss this with Mary at Sea Level, a professional geocentric astrologer and vocal flat earther.
Hi Eric - Love your substack & your take on the stupidity of the C19 story-line/mandates/vaxx etc - & esp appreciate your support for Christine Massey's excellent FOI work- well-done!) but your take on Pluto (& the supposed "planets") needs further research on your part imo.
Just as Christine Massey has been excessively trashed, so has Eric Dubay & others who have provided irrefutable evidence against a spinning, revolving globe earth & spinning planets in an expanding universe, etc. Evidence overwhelmingly indicates that earth is more of a "realm" than a spinning ball.
The constellations have NOT changed in millennia, which points to a stationary, central earth plane.
A critical point always made by those using NASA's planet photos/simulations, is that they are simply inventions > CGI/artists' renderings (such as your use of "Artist’s rendering of the view from Pluto". Eric that means "imaginary" ya know? Made up. Ask yourself, why in our increasingly technocratic world, no REAL PHOTOS FROM SPACE are shown, huh? Because the PTB can't produce them. Space is not "real".
This issue is so much more important than the shape of the earth & speaks to unparalleled deception.
> Mar 20, 2023 - Destroying the Globe with Socratic Questioning - Eric Dubay - 12K views - 1 day ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7nfxZHHiMk
Please see > Apr 26, 2022 - Why is Earth the Only Flat Planet? - Eric Dubay - 180K subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5UvtaFE-0k
Another common question posed by Globe Earthers is, "if the Earth is flat, then why are all the other planets round?" To begin with, the Earth is a plane, not a planet, and by simply adding a "t" on the end modern astronomers have linguistically transformed our Earth plane into a globe spun around the Sun. The word "round" is also deceiving, because most Flat Earthers would agree that the Earth is round like a coin, just not round like a ball. When making this argument online, Globe Earthers will often present a picture of the traditional heliocentric model with eight spherical planets and a Flat Earth among them floating in space. This entire concept is a strawman, however, as no Flat Earthers believe in a flat planet floating in space third from the Sun in a heliocentric solar system.
In NASA's many CGI depictions the planets do indeed appear spherical, but when looking at them for yourself through a telescope or super-zoom camera, it is certainly contestable whether or not the planets are spherical. Every time I have personally observed the planets they look like small, relatively flat, round lights and nothing like huge spherical terra firma worlds. Only in NASA and other "official" space agency footage do the planets appear like three-dimensional globular worlds; in amateur footage they look more like two-dimensional lights, similar to all the other stars. In fact, before they were called "planets," the ancients referred to them as "wandering stars" because they only differed from the other "fixed stars" in their relative motions. They each have their own unique appearance, but none of them look like spherical worlds, even Saturn which appears more like a circular luminary with a halo of light around it.
Ultimately, however, it is completely irrelevant what shape the other planets are when looking to prove the shape of the Earth. Modern astronomers constantly repeat this red herring that I have dubbed the "appeal to the sky" fallacy. Imagine inviting a contractor over to your house to measure the dimensions of your floor and instead they immediately get out their tape-measure and start measuring all the recessed lights in the ceiling! This is exactly what Globe Earthers are doing by claiming to provide scientific proof for the shape of the Earth under our feet by looking at lights in the sky over our head. Like magicians distracting you with one hand while fooling you with the other, globe apologists when asked for empirical, measurable proof of the shape of the Earth beneath their feet, invariably inevitably instead turn their noses up to the sky and start talking about the shape of things up there. But even if all the other planets really were spheres, what on Earth does that have to do with the shape of the Earth?
Get Connected With Me:
Website: http://www.EricDubay.com
Blog: http://www.AtlanteanConspiracy.com
See: Eric Dubay - Why is Earth the Only Flat Planet? - 70K views - 10months ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5UvtaFE-0k
Look forward to yours & others discussion/responses to this info, Eric. Question all authority, always.
Keep up all your good C19 questioning/research/work to educate, inform & change peoples' minds.
<3
Thank you! I look forward to reading every section.