Sep 3, 2022·edited Sep 3, 2022Pinned

Statement about Poornima Wagh coverage, Sept. 3, 2022


Poornima Wagh is not saying she merely attended the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) and did not get a degree, as some suggest is possible. She is saying she received two degrees. There is no trace of them anywhere inside or outside her claimed institution. She claims credentials she does not have.

She also said that a faculty member “pulled strings” to get her her doctorates.

Wagh is special as she is claiming a double doctorate from LSHTM, and NIH (United States federal government) affiliation — the area where Anthoni Fauci serves as well.

She claimed to have spoken to then-CDC director James Redfield personally, whom she claimed in one interview, order her to quash the results other study “proving" non-isolation.

She claims to have personally proved the nonexistence of the virus from an astounding 1,500 samples of lung lavage from “covid positive” pneumonia patients — and to have written a scientific paper about this that she will not produce.

Then she says her backing data was taken by the FBI even though she was proceeding under NIH go-ahead.

Then top presenters such as Lee Merritt and Regis Tremblay ran her up the flagpole unquestioned, and then nobody points out the gross errors in her statements. Then they don’t retract her broadcasts. Merritt is even defending her.

This story is about standards and practices in the new media as much as anything.

Problematic Scientific Assertions: Ignorance of Multiple Sequences

Regarding her “scientific" assertions, the opinions of a scientist are not the findings of science. All scientists must present their data if their claims are to be accepted. That is the whole point of science.

Apart from any specific and unverifiable experiment she claims to have conducted, let’s consider just one detail that is verifiable.

In our discussion on Friday, Aug. 26, 2022, Wagh — while claiming to be an accredited virologist and infectious disease specialist — said this was the first time she was hearing that there were multiple in silico sequences of SARS-CoV-2!

She said she thought there was only "Patient Zero” (who was actually claimed to be an AIDS patient and who died in 1984). And that, she says, is what she was trying to match against in her experiment on 756 lavage samples.

She had no idea there were multiples even though she claimed to be using the Blast database, where most of them are!

Corman and Dosten in their Jan. 23, 2020 Eurosurveillance paper establishing the World Health Organization’s PCR assay said they used six in silico sequences. Like it or not, it is one of the most famous papers in the history of virology, and it was world famous out of the gate. It “proved” the “reality” of the “pandemic” and the “test."

In fact by that same week (the last week in January 2020) there were at least 28 in silico sequences of “SARS-CoV-2” documented. Today there are 12 million versions of in silico "SARS-CoV-2” transcripts deposited into genetic libraries.

This is the whole problem. There is no original to match against — and everyone knows this.

Someone claiming to be working as a virus investigator — tasked with finding the particle — under the authority of the federal government — says she not only did not know that at the time of her experiment; she did not now it in late 2022.

She admitted openly that she heard about multiple versions of in silico sequences from me — for the first time, last week. She thought there was just one, on the day there were 12 million.

This is like someone getting on TV claiming to be an orthopedics expert and claiming the femur is in the elbow — that there are 16 bones in each foot.

Eric F. Coppolino

Executive Producer

Planet Waves FM - Pacifica Radio network

Expand full comment


Dear all,

Denis Rancourt & colleagues have examined all causes mortality by state, sex & date of occurrence in USA for a 100 week period extending from just before the alleged pandemic and into 2022.

Two options for interested parties:

-listen to the interview with Jeremy of Jerm Warfare

-read the very large manuscript for findings. I recommend reviewing the figures & tables once you’ve digested the abstract. It is a huge work.

Either way, unless the raw data are in severe error, the findings deal a devastating blow against the narrative that there’s a new virus causing mass scale illness & deaths.

Respiratory illness & deaths, assumed to be caused by viruses, characteristically are associated with elevated death rates, with markedly greater proportionate increased in deaths as age at death increases. It is known as the “respiratory illness death signature” & it’s evident in the death statistics in every northern hemisphere winter.

It is missing in the COVID era.

It’s up to you what you make if it.

I conclude that, whatever caused the increased mortality in USA, it was inconsistent with a virus causing severe respiratory illness and deaths.

If there indeed is a novel virus circulating, it’s not the cause of the deaths.

I made no comment in lab results by anybody. These aren’t capable of answering the key question, which is “Are the deaths data consistent with the narrative?”.

The answer is “No”.

Are there other, plausible explanations for the illnesses & deaths which definitely occurred?

The answer is “yes”.

Again, everyone, it’s up to you to decide what you think this means.

Be rigorous scientists & focus only on the evidence. If the raw data is suspect, the results may be undermined & the conclusions unsound.

But I submit you cannot just dismiss it because it’s uncomfortable. I didn’t begin with the position I now hold. It’s extremely uncomfortable, I assure you. I’ve been driven here by the evidence.

Thanks for reading my post,

Best wishes

Mike Yeadon

Expand full comment
Aug 30, 2022·edited Aug 30, 2022Author

While it may look like Wagh is the subject of the article, that is not really true.

This is ALL on Regis Tremblay and Dr. Lee Merritt for allowing her to go on and on the way they did. They gave Wagh her original platforms. The medium is the message.

I am reaching out to them for comment and will “press" them on this matter.

Lee Merritt, who is VERY highly regarded, especially has some ’splainin to do. I will also reach out to Exposé News as well and ask them to explain their comment, “We couldn’t find a bio so we took her word for it.” I mean really! (Great find on that quote.)

We may forgive the Malaysian webinar from Sunday, but not Reiner Füllmich — a fraud attorney — for inviting her on. Their whole specialty, their whole reason for existence, is supposed to be seeing through this kind of bullshit.

Yet he glad-handled her and invited her onto “investigative” committee that evidently does not really do much investigating. People noticed that and this does not reflect well on him.

All of the entities who promoted her should issue a retraction and give equal time — and I suggest we hold them to it.

Expand full comment

Wagh lied about her undegrad work as well. She claims a finance degree from Salisbury in December 1995.

It is really liberal studies.

Salisbury State University Commencement - December 1995


BSc (Liberal Studies)



Expand full comment

How does one get two phD’s with out ever having been published?? Hmmm… yes, the whole thing stinks of bullshit. There is no evidence of a lab fire either. Fuellmich himself has ties to Globalist money that conveniently stopped in late 2019, just before the Plandemic. None of them are interested in truth, only self-preservation and lies! I am so happy someone is having this discussion! Been called nothing but disinfo and a shill over it, so thank you! Proper vetting is important to make sure our message is not being hijacked for nefarious purposes

Expand full comment
Aug 30, 2022Liked by Eric F Coppolino

I watched a couple of her videos and she seemed way to cavalier to me - my internal compass said “bullshit” right away. I think she may be actually delusional. Thank you, Eric, for doing the real investigative journalism.

Expand full comment

I found this weird from the start. The fact that Fuelmich was interviewing her, when he has made it clear he's not interested in disproving the virus. And Wodarg is openly hostile.

Is this lack of being able to find a PHD or any sequences at all from millions of fragments all going to come out and be used to discredit team no virus?

Expand full comment

Brilliant work Eric and team. I have seen a couple of interviews with Wagh and, though interesting, I did not feel as drawn to her as I have been to yourself and Cowan/the Baileys et al. Maybe this was the reason for that. I think the one thing that stood out for me from the viroliegy team is the integrity that you hold yourselves to.

Expand full comment

Nothing; I covered my own nominal costs and receive no fee or salary.

Expand full comment

Nice investigative work. Cognitive infiltration is their major silent weapon in this game of death. The goal is to not be able to trust anyone and make you feel all alone on the battlefield for your life.

Expand full comment

Truly breathtaking work, Eric.

I added some additional context here:


Expand full comment

Three things made me suspicious of her.

-graphene, a big thing claimed, and yet she doesn't have proof like the quinta mierda and other so called lab tests. I'm really tired of this angle, you would think these labs would send a sample for spectrum analysis or something else better than interpreting shitty microscope images.

-Mac addresses of Bluetooth from vaxxed. Total bullshit. You cannot verify that until you are sure there are no devices around.

Plus, even a pacemaker that transmits only when prompted, requires a battery. The id chips in Sweden etc are rfid, passive like the chip in your credit card. Bluetooth uses more power than either, but somehow they found a body power source? Get the fk out of here.

- she claimed all the vaccines are the same (possible), but then with Regis interview, she said they weren't sure of the Chinese one WTF i thought they tested them all?

I'm sure more bullshit will turn up.

Oh and Eric, I like your stuff but cannot listen to your shows, your microphone setup gives me headaches... It's not clear sounding which happens a lot these days with everyone podcasting. But i shall read for now.

Expand full comment

This seems like the classic, tell the people the truth through a disreputable source, so that the truth can be negated and shelved.

Great reporting! I kind of fell for her story, mainly because I trust dr Merritt. Shame on the good doctor for not doing the proper vetting, and kudos to you for your due diligence!

Expand full comment
Sep 1, 2022·edited Sep 1, 2022

Steve Kirsch has brought attention to your article using it to get in a cheap shot at Tom Cowan, Sam Bailey, Mark Bailey, Andrew Kaufman and Jon Rappoport.


What a jerk.

Expand full comment

Wow! Great work Eric and team. This did need sorting pronto.

I am really disappointed that Drs Merritt & Fuellmich (I hadn't heard the latter one's interview yet) got sucked in and proud that none of you were.

Hoping Wagh hasn't done any damage to the credibility of the virus challenge. It will be interesting to learn what and/or who motivated her. She must have known she'd be exposed. Diagnosis Andy?

Relieved I can go back to trusting my instincts.

Love and Gratitude to all the dedicated ethical truthers. You are doing very noble and necessary work.

Expand full comment

Well well. This has now been hailed as brilliant by Steve Kirsch, who has shared it and managed to conflate your evidence against Wagh’s claims and her reticence to interview with him with the rest of the no-virus camp and their (entirely well-boundaried, sensible) refusal to do the same. More mud slinging and weird aggression.

I suspect this will send a new wave of subscribers your way, and his comments section becomes more and more intolerant of his behavior.

Expand full comment