...and lives in the Neighborhood of Make Believe. He has no clue how impeccably the missing virus problem has been documented, and if he's only pretending to not understand, that's worse.
As Tom Cowan described in his recent video, it is like Lucy pulling the football away every time Linus tries to kick it. Yet he keeps thinking ‘I know I’ll get a good piece of it next time’.
I came to the conclusion that Bigtree is controlled opposition a long time ago. Most of the “truthers” have these same qualities. Thank God for people like you!
Mark Windows calls them energy harvesters, which I think is a great description. But not only do these crews distract, misinform, divert and name take, they also rake in a lot of dough. If only people would spend the same amount of time, energy and money in their immediate local area, meeting and taking action with neighbors, we would have some hope of dismantling the long infiltrated stealth governance structures that are bringing sure death and destruction.
I was in a discussion with one of his followers on his discord server. They stated that the issue nowadays is that those on the top try to force Marxism upon us. And I said that it does not matter what this follower wants to call those actions because the issue is with degenerative principles. Windows did not like it and said that I cause a distraction and I have no knowledge. So I challenged him on what he said by saying that he should back up his statement about me or block me if he is unable to do this. So he decided to block me. After this I thanked him on FB for blocking me as I take it as his answer. He used ad hominem and blocked me there too.
that's one way of looking at it- but we have to remember- that if people who seem credible, are repeating the same narrative, it becomes more 'believable'. My positions, even in my own mind- were changing depending on what info i heard over the past two+ years- because i was trying to think through this whole scamdemic. There were certain people who really helped me come to think more clearly about the 'virus' thing. I took the time to watch documentaries-especially James Corbett- I thought about what David Martin has said about the patents, I listened to so many people- especially the Australian Doctors. It took me a long time to really grok the whole thing. I don't know about all the allegations about how other people come to their conclusions. It's a real stretch for me to assign motivations to people I have never met. I also go with my gut- especially people like Malone- just a little too smooth, way too connected. And then reading all the info on him on Solari- by CAF and Breggin- I came to the conclusion that the guy is REALLY dirty. I also have many suspicions about Steve Kirsch. Anyway- more thinking to do.
almost all the scientists and docs in the freedom movement here- 'believe' in the virus- they are people i've worked with on trying to stop GMO"s - 5G -celltowers- smart meters- I've known them for years- they've helped me time and again in the public arena. I've set up symposiums, interviews- on our public tv station. Right now the virus thing is one step too far. Many of them are in overwhelm. One i spoke to yesterday just took a long course in using the scopes where people were saying they saw signs of nanobots- self assembly, graphene etc. She says it's all very real. Also- looking at samples of quakzine- she said it was loaded with metallic objects and parasites of all kinds. She is someone I've know for over 20 years- is a pediatrician-does a lot of blood analysis now- treating vaxx injured children and their parents. Mike Yeadon recently made a comment on his own post- that sounded very like he was questioning the virus theory. I actually sent this to some of the docs i know who are working with him and Karen Kingston and others. I am going to give these people time to think better- we need them to. I can't make them think better- but i can keep on sending them what looks very credible to me and stay in conversation. That's what is most important. Because i can get so angry i just WANT them to see and understand. I know that I don't work that way and I see that they don't either.
FWIW Yeadon has admitted in an interview that he no longer believes respiratory viruses exist, thanks to the work of Kaufman, Cowan etc (he gives credit to them for changing his mind).
I always thought he seemed sincere and he seems to have gone on the same 'journey' as we all have with respect to 'viruses'... except it must be a lot harder for people with a career background in mainstream science/ medicine/ pharma to admit that what they were taught (and what they practiced) was pseudo science. Yeadon has shown how you can do a 180 without it having to be a big deal. He has come across new information.... he's considered it..... he's changed his position as a result. That's basically the definition of scientific progress, so there should be no shame or awkwardness about it.
I think it was Stefan Lanka who said it's important scientists are able to change their stance and still save face, otherwise they will just dig their heels in to protect their egos. (I'm not sure if he said all that, but it's a good point anyway!).
But darnit! I'm making my killer and oft requested meatball stirfry. I suppose I can eat it cold, later. After I get back from visiting Del in the stratosphere. HA.
"14 Million Variants, No Original, so Variants of What?"
It kind of crystalizes the craziness of it all.
Anyone who doesn't believe what you are saying will find in the "Corman-Drosten" paper (the PCR test inventors, you might say) a straightforward admission that they had no samples of the virus when they were creating the "test."
I too have waffled on this question, wary of everything printed about it. But more and more, the realization of fact settles on the discerning mind.
The same way it takes time to accept/digest the notion that government is truly evil in its intent more often than not, and would kill the taxpayers to feed an ideology. And use an injectable bioweapon to finish what a contact gel nanoparticle couldn’t.
Thank you for outstanding reportage.”The virus” is indeed the root of the scam. So many are still fooled its insane.
I can smell the fear from Ottawa and Washington and Davos. Satan’s lair.
Eric from the perspective of science, health and truth, I agree with you and all of the great team that makes up "no virus"!!
Here's the problem. This has nothing to do with any of that. It follows the pattern of a psychological operation writ large.
Whether "Del Bigtree" (nom de plume) or RFK, Jr (son of...) and the folks they gathered over the years around injuries from pharma injections, are part of the show, or simply following what they see is a mix of political pragmatism and a narrative that seems to have been working to get this show going, remains to be seen.
They have turned over some rocks but left the mountain standing. It keeps the show moving forward.
This isn't simply COVID Operation. The psy-op is a mix of operations going at least back to WWII (actually before). Divide and conquer is one of the tactics that have performed well throughout history of empire civilization.
Predictive Programming, as it's been developed over time, has transformed the psyche into a sort of laboratory and objective reality into episodes of things that didn't really happen - INCLUDING A PROVEN PATHOGENIC VIRUS. In fact, the more the illusion persists the more the symbiotic relationship between the pseudo-freedom bridgade and pharma can dance around their nonsensical "virus".
3/4 of our 'freedom community' or more - are delusional on this topic- here in Moron county-- they can't even put their cellphones down- much less in a Faraday bag--because they don't think they can comprehend biology- they are facebook babies- it's all about soundbites- they don't WANT to think- i never get the impression that Del actually understands 'science' - he can parrot Jeffrey Jaxon- and soundbites- he is not a particularly deep thinker- it's a stretch to think he's going to tackle this issue. I admire much of what Del has done. It may be that with people he cares about bringing this information - he may get it in time. I just don't see it as his focus. One of the big names needs to get it soon - or the viral paradigm, circle of bs- will carry on - it's just too convenient a stick for the jabber in chief- whoever it might be- trump, biden, fauci- whatever sick dog- to wield over the imaginations of the public- who are really nearly completely divorced from their actual surroundings. Bird song? Butterflies? Pollinators? Springtime?
Perhaps our friend co-conspiracy theorist and truthseeker and AI tech genius, inventor, and all-around great radio voice of sanity, Clif High, could discuss the nature of what i call “fear of information”. The new plague atop the other one concocted Of Evil, by Evil, and For the Evil.
Thank you for this! I watched Del's little rant and found it ridiculous! Pure QAnon for sure. BTW, Cowan, Kaufman, the Baileys, Lanka, Zeck, Massey, The Perth Group and many many others have wanted to have this conversation for quite sometime. Not "now, just when we are about to get these guys". So ridiculous. I messaged ICAN and told them what I thought about his crazy rant too.
I had a similar type of response that avoided my concern. This was my email to ICAN - Please let Del know that YES, at this exact time, we want to have the no virus conversation. Also, please let Del know that treating Dr. Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Stephan Lanka, Mark & Sam Bailey, Christine Massey, the Perth Group., etc as if they are enemies or adveraries is a very strange position to take. I have questioned for a long time, that Del must have a large donor/investor that does not want to have this conversation or Del realizes when fear is gone he has no show. It is my understanding that Del "gets into the science" but seems to avoid the clear science within this conversation.
My husband and I listened to the Highwire every weekend for a long time and I was a past donor. The "no virus" conversation is far more important to me. Dangling a carrot of players going to jail as a way to avoid or threaten or be-littlie this conversation does not interest me.
This was ICAN's response - Thank you for your email. We touched on this subject last week and Del plans on diving into this conversation within the next couple weeks.
He still is pushing the virus scam. After 3 years. I can’t think of any reason he would do that except that he is being coerced or just flat out lying. The fake virus has never been isolated by anyone anywhere. He has to know that by now. Why do you think he doing that?
I am royally pissed off by all the fans of Del, RFK Jr and the like who are so attached to their celebrities that they would swallow anything they say, including those who tell me how JJ Couey is brilliant because he "seems" to "bridge the gap between the two sides," when in fact he pushes the same crap of "wild coronaviruses" (never proven to exist) and that "the same genome was sequenced by scientists in a bunch of countries," when in fact nothing was sequenced, all these "genomes" were assembled via computer programs. The fans will grasp at anything to justify their clinging.
Speaking as someone who bobs in and out of various forms of celebrity, notoriety and a touch of fame, I find this cult mentality reprehensible and dangerous. It is anesthesia. These people are not true guides. They are not helping people sharpen their tools, or introduce them to new ones. They are making every issue all about themselves, exploiting pain and confusion for self-interest. I wish people did not seem to need this so much. The same thing happens with plenty of astrologers too, who know only how to turn their recognition into a cult. This is a standard form of a business in the United States, a kind of "star system" in the Hollywood sense; a bonfire of the vanities. I appreciate how many of my readers and listeners feel comfortable treating me as your neighbor. That and a faithful teacher are all I aspire to be.
People are trained, via the "education" system and the mass media culture they consume starting when they're old enough to watch TV, to be passive consumers, always looking for something new to consume and a celebrity to follow and live vicariously through. And those who attain stardom in the media culture, including in the "alternative" and social media, usually step willingly into that mode, working to perpetuate the culture and their role within it. With a few exceptions, who are the exceptions because they are committed to challenging this vulture culture.
Del Bigmouth says the virus deniers are endangering all the indictments that the self-appointed heroes have been slaving away at for all these years, and that said deniers will allow Fauci and co. to get away with their crimes.
I'm just wondering if Del has ever even mentioned the mass grave of orphan children in NY who died under experimentation of the Mengele of the Potomic. Indictments, my ass!
Perhaps what Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have been pursuing might enable indictments of the same (and higher up) for the same without the a priori necessity of even having a "virus" as evidence to begin with?
I know I am not a noteworthy person like those others you listed, but I also independently came up with the proof that CONVID was a Swindle.
3/21/2020 I showed that all of the claimed "effects of COVID" (shutdown of airlines, shutdown of factories, stock market crash, shortages of food and other necessities) have ALL been predicted as a consequence of Peak Oil: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrJ89-O_H5E
Then, 9/28/2020, I published "H0AX, part 1" (spelled that way to try to avoid Facebook/Twitter bans), where I showed
a) a schematic of the process that the Medical Industrial Complex / Allopathic Medicine uses to decide if there is a new disease, in about 6 unique steps (which I constructed myself, since I could not find this documented anywhere), and
b) how NONE of these steps were followed with COVID, and furthermore,
c) that these steps COULD NOT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED due to anomalies of the timeline. To wit: that the CDC was modifying the SYNDROME DEFINITION up until May 25 2020, when the "Disease" had been "proven" and named 2/11/2020. BIG PROBLEM: The Syndrome definition is STEP ZERO in the process of determining new disease. So it is NOT POSSIBLE to declare that a new disease exists THREE FULL MONTHS before the Syndrome Definition was complete!
Great work Eric. To give the devil his due, when you mention he is potentially unaware of the no virus argument. He has at least been internally consistent, even if it's consistently dishonest. It was, I would say, 18 months ago now, long before the Derek Broze interview, when he was interviewed on World alternative media where he trotted out the excuse that people simply weren't ready for this stuff. He said he was aware of the terrain concept and the no virus position but basically said we can beat them (virology) with their own science so that's the more practical way to go. Again, I'm not saying that's not idiotic, but it is somewhat internally consistent in terms of being aware of the discussion. Funny that after saying no we can't do it now, people aren't ready, 18 months later his line is now why do you want to do this now? It's too late!
I also think it's interesting he has cleared himself of disagreeing quite carefully on the soundbite you provide. He doesn't say 'if you want to say there's no virus then you are wrong', just 'if you want to say there's no virus.... then look over here!!' He has paved a road potentially where if the weight of the no virus team is too much to bear he can back peddle and say I never said they were wrong, they just had the wrong tactics!
He is fully aware of the position. He's had Kaufman on, way at the beginning, and so he is on notice; and Christine Massey has reached out to him. And he has obviously seen my work on the issue, which has reached far and wide. I've been going after RFK for a year aggressively, and there is no way that his research team has not picked up on this fact.
You wrote: "Del Bigtree ends his rant with, Was this all for nothing? Meaning, if there was no virus, we went through this for nothing? But that’s not a real question, and it doesn’t solve any of our problems."
Respectfully, I disagree, though I concede unanswered it remains potentially (and perhaps intentionally?) unbalancing rhetorical theater. It is nonetheless an open question to the heart of the matter. The purpose, as we may all know, was to conduct a social experiment (testing psy-ops driven coercion and compliance). The immediate tools under test were a panoply of "measures" implemented to address the phantom menace with its frequent association to no rise in excess deaths. One arm was the injections (hardly experimental, as the controls had been dropped very early ~ science left the room ~ and 'effectiveness' (shown to be negative risk benefit) was an ad hoc modeled construct. Other arms included the denial of treatment, masks, mandates, social distancing, multiple variant "virus" boogies, orchestrated "disruption," free money, nonsense generation of 'cases', etc.
All of this skates past the abrogation of established ethics, the most heinous crime of all. Those ethics were built on the graves of millions and here we are in the clutch of of evil repeating history.
We're gonna cover it... a little down the road.
Just wait.
COMING SOON!!!!
It's gonna be great!!!!
this is pure QAnon...this is what they always say...
Bobby's a little to busy right now. Full calendar. Stay in touch. He's committed to covering this issue fairly and fully. Coming right up... stand by.
Del's got a hair appointment, but will get back to you ASAP.
As Tom Cowan described in his recent video, it is like Lucy pulling the football away every time Linus tries to kick it. Yet he keeps thinking ‘I know I’ll get a good piece of it next time’.
haha...exactly...
Right?!?!
Great!
lol - What weanies.
I came to the conclusion that Bigtree is controlled opposition a long time ago. Most of the “truthers” have these same qualities. Thank God for people like you!
Mark Windows calls them energy harvesters, which I think is a great description. But not only do these crews distract, misinform, divert and name take, they also rake in a lot of dough. If only people would spend the same amount of time, energy and money in their immediate local area, meeting and taking action with neighbors, we would have some hope of dismantling the long infiltrated stealth governance structures that are bringing sure death and destruction.
Mark Windows is a gate keeper too. I challenged him on his nonsense and when he realized that he can't back up his claims, he blocked me.
Care to share what you challenged him on? I'd be curious.
I was in a discussion with one of his followers on his discord server. They stated that the issue nowadays is that those on the top try to force Marxism upon us. And I said that it does not matter what this follower wants to call those actions because the issue is with degenerative principles. Windows did not like it and said that I cause a distraction and I have no knowledge. So I challenged him on what he said by saying that he should back up his statement about me or block me if he is unable to do this. So he decided to block me. After this I thanked him on FB for blocking me as I take it as his answer. He used ad hominem and blocked me there too.
Lucy- please elaborate?
that's one way of looking at it- but we have to remember- that if people who seem credible, are repeating the same narrative, it becomes more 'believable'. My positions, even in my own mind- were changing depending on what info i heard over the past two+ years- because i was trying to think through this whole scamdemic. There were certain people who really helped me come to think more clearly about the 'virus' thing. I took the time to watch documentaries-especially James Corbett- I thought about what David Martin has said about the patents, I listened to so many people- especially the Australian Doctors. It took me a long time to really grok the whole thing. I don't know about all the allegations about how other people come to their conclusions. It's a real stretch for me to assign motivations to people I have never met. I also go with my gut- especially people like Malone- just a little too smooth, way too connected. And then reading all the info on him on Solari- by CAF and Breggin- I came to the conclusion that the guy is REALLY dirty. I also have many suspicions about Steve Kirsch. Anyway- more thinking to do.
Thinking for one's self is never, EVER a bad thing. Just do lots of it before you act is the key. ;-)
almost all the scientists and docs in the freedom movement here- 'believe' in the virus- they are people i've worked with on trying to stop GMO"s - 5G -celltowers- smart meters- I've known them for years- they've helped me time and again in the public arena. I've set up symposiums, interviews- on our public tv station. Right now the virus thing is one step too far. Many of them are in overwhelm. One i spoke to yesterday just took a long course in using the scopes where people were saying they saw signs of nanobots- self assembly, graphene etc. She says it's all very real. Also- looking at samples of quakzine- she said it was loaded with metallic objects and parasites of all kinds. She is someone I've know for over 20 years- is a pediatrician-does a lot of blood analysis now- treating vaxx injured children and their parents. Mike Yeadon recently made a comment on his own post- that sounded very like he was questioning the virus theory. I actually sent this to some of the docs i know who are working with him and Karen Kingston and others. I am going to give these people time to think better- we need them to. I can't make them think better- but i can keep on sending them what looks very credible to me and stay in conversation. That's what is most important. Because i can get so angry i just WANT them to see and understand. I know that I don't work that way and I see that they don't either.
FWIW Yeadon has admitted in an interview that he no longer believes respiratory viruses exist, thanks to the work of Kaufman, Cowan etc (he gives credit to them for changing his mind).
I always thought he seemed sincere and he seems to have gone on the same 'journey' as we all have with respect to 'viruses'... except it must be a lot harder for people with a career background in mainstream science/ medicine/ pharma to admit that what they were taught (and what they practiced) was pseudo science. Yeadon has shown how you can do a 180 without it having to be a big deal. He has come across new information.... he's considered it..... he's changed his position as a result. That's basically the definition of scientific progress, so there should be no shame or awkwardness about it.
I think it was Stefan Lanka who said it's important scientists are able to change their stance and still save face, otherwise they will just dig their heels in to protect their egos. (I'm not sure if he said all that, but it's a good point anyway!).
and she has what is called lymes- and also works on glyphosate poisoning. I forgot to add that.
Wonderful description and observations. Thank you! Hard to put that gut feeling into "evidence".
i agree - but our gut feeling and our intuition are of utmost importance in these times that are upon us
Feelings and intuition are bad cognitive standards.
Best headline ever :)
Makes me wanna have shrooms for dinner!
But darnit! I'm making my killer and oft requested meatball stirfry. I suppose I can eat it cold, later. After I get back from visiting Del in the stratosphere. HA.
Come over Janice!
You wanna a late Birthday dinner or you are planning on eating my shrooms? Or both. HA.
def both Janice
Love this:
"14 Million Variants, No Original, so Variants of What?"
It kind of crystalizes the craziness of it all.
Anyone who doesn't believe what you are saying will find in the "Corman-Drosten" paper (the PCR test inventors, you might say) a straightforward admission that they had no samples of the virus when they were creating the "test."
I too have waffled on this question, wary of everything printed about it. But more and more, the realization of fact settles on the discerning mind.
The same way it takes time to accept/digest the notion that government is truly evil in its intent more often than not, and would kill the taxpayers to feed an ideology. And use an injectable bioweapon to finish what a contact gel nanoparticle couldn’t.
Thank you for outstanding reportage.”The virus” is indeed the root of the scam. So many are still fooled its insane.
I can smell the fear from Ottawa and Washington and Davos. Satan’s lair.
Eric from the perspective of science, health and truth, I agree with you and all of the great team that makes up "no virus"!!
Here's the problem. This has nothing to do with any of that. It follows the pattern of a psychological operation writ large.
Whether "Del Bigtree" (nom de plume) or RFK, Jr (son of...) and the folks they gathered over the years around injuries from pharma injections, are part of the show, or simply following what they see is a mix of political pragmatism and a narrative that seems to have been working to get this show going, remains to be seen.
They have turned over some rocks but left the mountain standing. It keeps the show moving forward.
This isn't simply COVID Operation. The psy-op is a mix of operations going at least back to WWII (actually before). Divide and conquer is one of the tactics that have performed well throughout history of empire civilization.
Predictive Programming, as it's been developed over time, has transformed the psyche into a sort of laboratory and objective reality into episodes of things that didn't really happen - INCLUDING A PROVEN PATHOGENIC VIRUS. In fact, the more the illusion persists the more the symbiotic relationship between the pseudo-freedom bridgade and pharma can dance around their nonsensical "virus".
3/4 of our 'freedom community' or more - are delusional on this topic- here in Moron county-- they can't even put their cellphones down- much less in a Faraday bag--because they don't think they can comprehend biology- they are facebook babies- it's all about soundbites- they don't WANT to think- i never get the impression that Del actually understands 'science' - he can parrot Jeffrey Jaxon- and soundbites- he is not a particularly deep thinker- it's a stretch to think he's going to tackle this issue. I admire much of what Del has done. It may be that with people he cares about bringing this information - he may get it in time. I just don't see it as his focus. One of the big names needs to get it soon - or the viral paradigm, circle of bs- will carry on - it's just too convenient a stick for the jabber in chief- whoever it might be- trump, biden, fauci- whatever sick dog- to wield over the imaginations of the public- who are really nearly completely divorced from their actual surroundings. Bird song? Butterflies? Pollinators? Springtime?
Perhaps our friend co-conspiracy theorist and truthseeker and AI tech genius, inventor, and all-around great radio voice of sanity, Clif High, could discuss the nature of what i call “fear of information”. The new plague atop the other one concocted Of Evil, by Evil, and For the Evil.
I’m not in “Moron” County, but get the Marin Freedom Rising” email blasts. They’ve been pushing the lab leak nonsense quite hard lately.
🎯
Thank you for this! I watched Del's little rant and found it ridiculous! Pure QAnon for sure. BTW, Cowan, Kaufman, the Baileys, Lanka, Zeck, Massey, The Perth Group and many many others have wanted to have this conversation for quite sometime. Not "now, just when we are about to get these guys". So ridiculous. I messaged ICAN and told them what I thought about his crazy rant too.
i emailed with my disapproval... whoever answered was defending it stating:
"I think you will be surprised to hear his discussion.
Stay Tuned
Respectfully,
Kari Black
ICAN"
I had a similar type of response that avoided my concern. This was my email to ICAN - Please let Del know that YES, at this exact time, we want to have the no virus conversation. Also, please let Del know that treating Dr. Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Stephan Lanka, Mark & Sam Bailey, Christine Massey, the Perth Group., etc as if they are enemies or adveraries is a very strange position to take. I have questioned for a long time, that Del must have a large donor/investor that does not want to have this conversation or Del realizes when fear is gone he has no show. It is my understanding that Del "gets into the science" but seems to avoid the clear science within this conversation.
My husband and I listened to the Highwire every weekend for a long time and I was a past donor. The "no virus" conversation is far more important to me. Dangling a carrot of players going to jail as a way to avoid or threaten or be-littlie this conversation does not interest me.
This was ICAN's response - Thank you for your email. We touched on this subject last week and Del plans on diving into this conversation within the next couple weeks.
Respectfully,
Kari Black
If the government can’t keep the virus myth alive, they have no justification for the Childhood Vaccination Schedule.
He still is pushing the virus scam. After 3 years. I can’t think of any reason he would do that except that he is being coerced or just flat out lying. The fake virus has never been isolated by anyone anywhere. He has to know that by now. Why do you think he doing that?
darling Lucy IT IS HIS JOB...he is the Virus Candidate.
Del and his cohorts, shredded into fine dust. That was MASTERFUL, Eric!
<3 you are the most thoughtful critiquer of them all JS
Thank you!
I am royally pissed off by all the fans of Del, RFK Jr and the like who are so attached to their celebrities that they would swallow anything they say, including those who tell me how JJ Couey is brilliant because he "seems" to "bridge the gap between the two sides," when in fact he pushes the same crap of "wild coronaviruses" (never proven to exist) and that "the same genome was sequenced by scientists in a bunch of countries," when in fact nothing was sequenced, all these "genomes" were assembled via computer programs. The fans will grasp at anything to justify their clinging.
Speaking as someone who bobs in and out of various forms of celebrity, notoriety and a touch of fame, I find this cult mentality reprehensible and dangerous. It is anesthesia. These people are not true guides. They are not helping people sharpen their tools, or introduce them to new ones. They are making every issue all about themselves, exploiting pain and confusion for self-interest. I wish people did not seem to need this so much. The same thing happens with plenty of astrologers too, who know only how to turn their recognition into a cult. This is a standard form of a business in the United States, a kind of "star system" in the Hollywood sense; a bonfire of the vanities. I appreciate how many of my readers and listeners feel comfortable treating me as your neighbor. That and a faithful teacher are all I aspire to be.
People are trained, via the "education" system and the mass media culture they consume starting when they're old enough to watch TV, to be passive consumers, always looking for something new to consume and a celebrity to follow and live vicariously through. And those who attain stardom in the media culture, including in the "alternative" and social media, usually step willingly into that mode, working to perpetuate the culture and their role within it. With a few exceptions, who are the exceptions because they are committed to challenging this vulture culture.
Del Bigmouth says the virus deniers are endangering all the indictments that the self-appointed heroes have been slaving away at for all these years, and that said deniers will allow Fauci and co. to get away with their crimes.
I'm just wondering if Del has ever even mentioned the mass grave of orphan children in NY who died under experimentation of the Mengele of the Potomic. Indictments, my ass!
If they can't provide a sample of the virus, that makes their crimes that much worse !!
Perhaps what Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt have been pursuing might enable indictments of the same (and higher up) for the same without the a priori necessity of even having a "virus" as evidence to begin with?
Just FYI... in terms of "independent teams"...
I know I am not a noteworthy person like those others you listed, but I also independently came up with the proof that CONVID was a Swindle.
3/21/2020 I showed that all of the claimed "effects of COVID" (shutdown of airlines, shutdown of factories, stock market crash, shortages of food and other necessities) have ALL been predicted as a consequence of Peak Oil: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrJ89-O_H5E
Then, 9/28/2020, I published "H0AX, part 1" (spelled that way to try to avoid Facebook/Twitter bans), where I showed
a) a schematic of the process that the Medical Industrial Complex / Allopathic Medicine uses to decide if there is a new disease, in about 6 unique steps (which I constructed myself, since I could not find this documented anywhere), and
b) how NONE of these steps were followed with COVID, and furthermore,
c) that these steps COULD NOT HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED due to anomalies of the timeline. To wit: that the CDC was modifying the SYNDROME DEFINITION up until May 25 2020, when the "Disease" had been "proven" and named 2/11/2020. BIG PROBLEM: The Syndrome definition is STEP ZERO in the process of determining new disease. So it is NOT POSSIBLE to declare that a new disease exists THREE FULL MONTHS before the Syndrome Definition was complete!
COMPARE: 5/24/2020: http://web.archive.org/web/20200524184141/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html
vs 5/26/2020: http://web.archive.org/web/20200526003916/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html
See: https://billhustonpodcast.blogspot.com/2020/09/germ-theory-of-disease-h0ax-pt-1.html
Great work Eric. To give the devil his due, when you mention he is potentially unaware of the no virus argument. He has at least been internally consistent, even if it's consistently dishonest. It was, I would say, 18 months ago now, long before the Derek Broze interview, when he was interviewed on World alternative media where he trotted out the excuse that people simply weren't ready for this stuff. He said he was aware of the terrain concept and the no virus position but basically said we can beat them (virology) with their own science so that's the more practical way to go. Again, I'm not saying that's not idiotic, but it is somewhat internally consistent in terms of being aware of the discussion. Funny that after saying no we can't do it now, people aren't ready, 18 months later his line is now why do you want to do this now? It's too late!
I also think it's interesting he has cleared himself of disagreeing quite carefully on the soundbite you provide. He doesn't say 'if you want to say there's no virus then you are wrong', just 'if you want to say there's no virus.... then look over here!!' He has paved a road potentially where if the weight of the no virus team is too much to bear he can back peddle and say I never said they were wrong, they just had the wrong tactics!
He is fully aware of the position. He's had Kaufman on, way at the beginning, and so he is on notice; and Christine Massey has reached out to him. And he has obviously seen my work on the issue, which has reached far and wide. I've been going after RFK for a year aggressively, and there is no way that his research team has not picked up on this fact.
You wrote: "Del Bigtree ends his rant with, Was this all for nothing? Meaning, if there was no virus, we went through this for nothing? But that’s not a real question, and it doesn’t solve any of our problems."
Respectfully, I disagree, though I concede unanswered it remains potentially (and perhaps intentionally?) unbalancing rhetorical theater. It is nonetheless an open question to the heart of the matter. The purpose, as we may all know, was to conduct a social experiment (testing psy-ops driven coercion and compliance). The immediate tools under test were a panoply of "measures" implemented to address the phantom menace with its frequent association to no rise in excess deaths. One arm was the injections (hardly experimental, as the controls had been dropped very early ~ science left the room ~ and 'effectiveness' (shown to be negative risk benefit) was an ad hoc modeled construct. Other arms included the denial of treatment, masks, mandates, social distancing, multiple variant "virus" boogies, orchestrated "disruption," free money, nonsense generation of 'cases', etc.
All of this skates past the abrogation of established ethics, the most heinous crime of all. Those ethics were built on the graves of millions and here we are in the clutch of of evil repeating history.
But you know all this.
my article and resources on the viral lie
https://sacredheartvortex.substack.com/p/viral-dissonance