16 Comments
тна Return to thread

what other side is there to intimidating an investigative team? Just for the sake of a thought experiment. Political actors threatening journalists? Cmon...

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 13, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Roger, you're not anything about your observations. You've chimed in quite a bit on Celia's website. Please commit to a position and let's discuss if it works.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
May 13, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
May 13, 2023Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 13, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment

You would believe in it if someone spread a rumor that you were a (name criminal act) and/or went to your friends, family, employers, and had you fired on a wholly false, malicious pretext. There should be a high standard...and public figures the requirement is an "actual malice" standard. If someone is going to be a public figure and comment generally on everything, they better take the heat or get out of the kitchen.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 14, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

you're all over the place here.

What is the connection between "actual malice" and the Attorney General?

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 15, 2023Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Roger would you please email me? efc@planetwaves.net. Thank you.

Expand full comment

That's not what any of this is about. I am not here debating the issues. I am here to tell you that political operatives are coming at me and telling me to deny the findings of my own investigation re the PCR and the virus. Plain and simple. It does not matter if I am dead wrong.

I suggest you read this, carefully, a few times. I lay everything out impeccably.

https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/the-pandemic-is-officially-over-now

Expand full comment
Comment removed
May 15, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment