Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elle's avatar

“Everything in digital is dimensionless — flatter than flat. We are neither men nor women — we are all in drag, because there is neither sex nor gender. There is no smell or touch. There are no cats, dogs, birds or horses — only pictures of them. And I’d welcome raccoons raiding my trash any time over the robots that hack websites.”

And we thought we were moving into 5D. Lol

I prefer IRL. I refuse QR codes. Luddites Anon. Yes, I’d prefer coffee in a cafe but it is nice to hear from you, too. A sane voice across the web. 🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Daniel's avatar

Having spend a good couple of months looking into the FE phenomenon, I'm left with a lot of doubts about both models. The globe is a good model which explains many things, but they are still questions unanswered and historical studies (airy's failure, the bedford level experiment) which cast doubt on what we are told to believe at a very young age. There is no real FE model which makes sense in my opinion, but still there are enough questions for me to end up saying I just don't know. NASA is a cartoon organisation, why would there be so much blatantly fake footage if the basis of their claims are actually real? TBH since material reality is an illusion, I am not even sure there is an objective model at all. maybe both are true? maybe there's another option they are hiding?

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?