New PWFM planned for Friday night; special edition Saturday when the Year of the Cat begins
I'll have two PWFM editions this week — a regular show tonight, and tomorrow, an exclusive interview with Dr. Jay Couey, the science advisor to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Good afternoon from upstate New York!
I’m planning a new program tonight, covering the Aquarius New Moon, my closing arguments on “covid” part 2, a presentation by New York-based activist Leland Lehrman, and a fun edition of Tantra Studio. The program will appear here.
Saturday at about 4 pm EST (after the Aquarius New Moon and when Asian New Year happens, chart below), I’ll publish my exclusive interview with Dr. Jay Couey, who is the scientific advisor to Children’s Health Defense, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Mary Holland.
The special edition will appear on the same page, and it will also be posted to a new Substack post to facilitate discussion. Please look for that announcement to this list Saturday at about 4 pm EST.
Thank You For Doing Your Part
Many, many people now listen to Planet Waves FM. We are here to provide a place of refuge, contemplation and honest discussion while the world is doing its crazy thing. We are a place of calm in the storm and indeed, a lighthouse on the coast showing the way to a safe harbor. We provide dependable information in a time of noise and clutter.
Thank you to those who support the program, making it possible for everyone else to listen. All revenue to this Substack directly funds the program and the Chiron Return investigative team. Thank you for becoming a paying subscriber.
You may also donate directly to Chiron Return. If you value and respect our work and want to sponsor a project, initiative of employee, by becoming a major donor, please reach me directly at email@example.com.
Please become a paying subscriber. This Substack is really worth it! Thank you.
In Re: Magdalena (conjunct the New Moon)
Okay let me try. It started with Lilith, who is the High Priestess of BDSM, especially for Dominatrixes. Now Lilith is a Biblical figure and a Done Over, and she is also demonised in the earlier Jewish traditions. If a BDSM mind reads about her in the Bible though, they see a case study in the Doing Over of the concept of of the empowered woman, or a case of a sexually empowered Woman on Top. In a Patriarchal religion, this is construed as a weakness in the make, which is cast as a sin in the female.
From there I went looking into the Magdalena from two angles. First, what was the Catholic church so afraid of in the Cathars? They were devotees of Magdalena, and the power of the 'Not-Mary', so they had to be exterminated to preserve the lie of who and what Mary is supposed to be. Mary of course, is a lie.
That led to investigation of the Templars, their sacred skull icon (by conjecture, the actual skull of the Magdalene, hidden in plain sight as 'Baphomet' which is the fertility goddess the Church made into Satan) and that brought me to Michael Haag, who seems to function as Wilhelm Reich to Dan Brown's Freudian take on these matters. Haag's book, the Quest for the Magdalene, re-contextualises Mary and the other Mary (there are two in the Biblical tale) AND the Magdalena, in a proper contextualisation of Jesus as both a tantric and a spiritual figure within the actual social framework of his time.
Haag makes the case that Jesus was an iteration of Dionysus, rather than the 'Nearly Jewish' Messiah that he has been engineered to be, in the Bible. As part of this work, he brings to the fore the actual tribe of women who travelled with and supported Jesus, and contextualises the apostles and the Magdalena from a Dionysian point of view, appropriate to the actual time at hand. He points out that the Magdalena was the one who 'got' Jesus, as in, she understood and found union with him, in both a tantric sexual sense and as a spiritual healer and leader. Haag draws a rich story of what we would call a very empowered, sexual woman, and a multi-dimensional love between her and Jesus.
Haag's take on Mary, by comparison, is called out as a confection and an agendered cover-up, which it is. Brown's concoction is an attempt to re-invigorate the Mary story as the Magdalena, but he's got the false woman and the real woman utterly confused, as has the Church. He gives reasons for this cover story, and explores method, but I don't want to spoil the surprise in the work. Except to say, they accused the wrong one of being the whore! Which they do, always, because they promote only a very narrow version of sexuality, for prison making purposes.
So projecting all that to the Asteroid Magdalena, she may be a call out to the real and robust ripeness of a sexually empowered woman, as well as a get out of prison card to men, that they're no longer trapped in a prescribed method of love and lust.
Hope that helps!
Brilliant. Can't wait for the interview Eric. Have you already done it? I sure hope he had a critique of the no virus position that was more substantial and specific than that it simply 'lacks nuance' as he told Christine. I'll tell you what lacks nuance....the critique that it lacks nuance itself!
Very suspicious response from CHD too. After mindfully essentially completely ignoring the virus existence question for 2 years, you would think Mary and RFK Jr, if genuine, would have a response ready to deliver to Christine that they have cultivated some time over the past 2 years, instead it seems like they just offloaded the problem of answering for their actions to Mr Couey as if he just drew the short straw. This despite only having joined them in the last 6 months.