Manipulation is remote from engineering. The latter requires *predictable* results. How predictable have been the results of GMOs? And admissions of what? Plans to do this and that? How many plans have been announced regarding "bio-weapons"? Which is more complex, the global weather system or the biology of individual organisms?
Manipulation is remote from engineering. The latter requires *predictable* results. How predictable have been the results of GMOs? And admissions of what? Plans to do this and that? How many plans have been announced regarding "bio-weapons"? Which is more complex, the global weather system or the biology of individual organisms?
Jeff, there is no debate here; it would be speculative. We are still in what I call the center column тАФ that which is unknown. It's good to make peace with that, because it's a very large category.
Manipulation is remote from engineering. The latter requires *predictable* results. How predictable have been the results of GMOs? And admissions of what? Plans to do this and that? How many plans have been announced regarding "bio-weapons"? Which is more complex, the global weather system or the biology of individual organisms?
Jeff, there is no debate here; it would be speculative. We are still in what I call the center column тАФ that which is unknown. It's good to make peace with that, because it's a very large category.
btw I am much less interested in weather control then I am in these laser or microwave thingies.
You might ask Michael Janitch about Nexrad radar and how they use it to induce heat domes, for example, and steer/dissipate/accentuate storms.