Tonight, I have an interview with Dr. Mark Bailey, my nominee for most knowledgeable person on the virology problem, PCR test fraud and how covid was pulled off. Also, Taurus total eclipse and more.
Virology appears to be the new Alchemy backed by computer programs to mesmerize the world. Or a Virus is the invisible scapegoat to blame for whatever ails ya.
Any visit to a doctor, especially with a child in the last two decades will prove just how right you are about the scapegoat comment. It's always "a virus". I can't tell you how many doctors I fired as a mother.
Thanks Eric. Just curious re the financial implications you got into in the last half hour of the interview. Do you have any thoughts on Catherine Austin Fitts (and for that matter CJ Hopkins, who is collaborating with her lately). She is very up with the play on the financial coup d'etat but is a complete virus enthusiast. It seems incredulous that people so up with the play could not entertain the science (or complete lack thereof) underlying virology.
She and CJ are unable to think outside the virus box. And what's worse in the sense of intent is that they both push virus existence in the context of the "lab-leak bio-weapon" because they think this works to promote their perspective.
I found this on another channel, here on Bitchute and thankfully, they linked you so I HAD to come and like and sub and check out your other stuff. I'd seen you once before, but there wasn't a link and for some reason, you didn't come up in a search. It's like that with a lot of the "Team NO Virus" folks. Even here on the "free speech" platforms, the powers that ought not be employ their censorship tricks and treats. I also hopped over to your Substack and am VERY excited about your astrology posts and vids. I too, glean information from the space rocks and have been studying charts for a couple of years now and find it fascinating as well as fulfilling. (edited to add::: even more so once I found and read Simon Shack's book "The Tychos". It's free and comes with an amazing, interactive planetarium at tychos.space) I love Roland Legrand and while I have a lot of random "how to" books, his are my favorite for serious study. His videos are really good too. ABLAS on Youtube. But, back to Sam's wife...teehee! The Dr.'s Bailey are adorable and this is one of the best interviews I've seen Mark give. Your questions were spot on and it's such a pleasant surprise when the interviewer is almost as well versed in the subject matter as the interviewee. Your passion for the subject brings excellence to your work. Mark's paper was an amazing read and despite being a "Team NO Virus" member for over two years and a proud anti-vaxer for well over two decades, it kept my attention. His aplomb shone through and I really should send him an email of gratitude. Thank you both for your dedication to one of the most important issues of our day. We MUST fix this horrendous flaw in our thinking or it will be the death of us all. We must find and walk the correct path or we're bound to remain scattered and lost, seeking and never finding the truth. When everything you think you know turns out to be outright lies and fabrications, you can't live life to it's fullest. You just sorta bumble around in the dark.
Thank you for making sure the flashlight has fresh batteries. Now...let's hit some heads with it.
Eric, i heard the interview a few days ago, this was the first time i heard the rest of the program. A couple of things to say about "the rest."
1. What is the public mood? (you expressed an inability to really tune in on what it is) From my limited experience in a very limited environment, Compliance Central, aka the San Francisco Bay Area (indeed in Berkeley, hard core believers), people were simply stunned into operating in a state in which thinking is rigorously evaded. Even in the "health freedom" community (right on re your description of it as being co-opted into the "lab-leak bio-weapon" narrative, turning into the biggest pusher of that narrative), this antipathy to thinking is rampant. People seem extra busy pushing the narrative of "the shots are so terrible, so deadly, and do nothing about 'COVID,'" oblivious as to how they are reinforcing the core narrative. FEAR rules.
2. Sexuality. What i am exploring is how to maintain touch with one's sexual being in spite of the fact that a future relationship is highly unlikely, due to demographic reality (age and isolation of non-believers) as well as personal issues which never got resolved over the last 31 years of involuntary celibacy, doubtful they could have been resolved under the rest of circumstances. I think maintaining touch is essential to retaining sanity. Porn doesn't work. So, how can one best use their fantasy, based upon life experiences and extrapolations from these?
Measuring or tapping into public mood depends on where you are standing. Legacy media is effectively tapping into the public mood of fear (and/or creating it) because they know their audience. The audience is primed for propaganda, being totally swarmed in digital fog, disembodied from grounded reality and wandering around in numbed out denial. I think this speaks as to why Eric can't feel people caring about anything, and not seeing "the wisdom of humanity welling up". Denial prevents that kind of response. Denial prevents people having to face the scorching truth. Avoidance of pain. Who wants to face that they have been duped and poisoned? That their whole family and friends and colleagues have been intentionally harmed? I don't think it is realistic to expect people to lean into that... unless or until they "have to". Unless or until the shit hits the fan. I personally don't see another way to break the trance of denial.
Eric et al have an audience, but it couldn't be described as "the public", being that it is still a comparatively small minority. That has the potential to change, which of course is what we, the minority, want.
Sexuality: So if I understand you correctly, what you are asking is, how do you stay in touch with your sexuality when you are on your own with that, yes? My 2 cents here is that I find it fundamental to self-proclaim yourself as a sexual being. It's more than just a simple sentence. What does it mean to you personally? Exploring this, and exploring it deeply can help you stay in touch. How? That's up to you. It's not easy to go solo on that, though I personally have found psychedelic plant medicines (incl. MJ) very helpful indeed. Beyond that I think it's possible to find online communities who are devoted to exploration, though that's not without pitfalls, particularly if porn doesn't work for you. Eric interviewed a sex worker in 2021 who was involved with clients who didn't want direct sexual contact, but rather someone to talk about sex with, with varying degrees of closeness.
I have also been celibate since Summer 2021 for obvious reasons, so I hear your pain when you refer to 31 years of involuntary celibacy. Don't give up on yourself.
"Legacy media is effectively tapping into the public mood of fear (and/or creating it) because they know their audience. The audience is primed for propaganda, being totally swarmed in digital fog, disembodied from grounded reality and wandering around in numbed out denial. I think this speaks as to why Eric can't feel people caring about anything, and not seeing "the wisdom of humanity welling up". Denial prevents that kind of response. Denial prevents people having to face the scorching truth. Avoidance of pain. Who wants to face that they have been duped and poisoned? "
WELL-stated, very well! I think there's even a worse aspect which Eric brought up, the form of denial which is increasingly afflicting the "health freedom" movement, people who think that they are breaking with the denial and seeing how things really are but who refuse to go very far, do not venture past what movement celebrity figures tell them, and react in an angry or even suppressive manner when they see others, especially people they know, go further than they have gone before. It makes them insecure.
" don't think it is realistic to expect people to lean into that... unless or until they "have to". Unless or until the shit hits the fan. "
How much shit has to hit the fan? :-) One would think there's been more than enough. I'm not sure what it takes. I didn't get past my support of the Vietnam War till first my brother came home and informed me (in a casual way, didn't mean to upset my world view) about what he'd seen and experienced, and second, till i had a close encounter with being drafted into the service in the form of a pre-induction physical (which never got to actual induction, luckily). I think Eric is doing a wonderful job at least getting out vital information, doing so while maintaining a very personal touch, not coming off like a super-rational detached scientist.
"My 2 cents here is that I find it fundamental to self-proclaim yourself as a sexual being. It's more than just a simple sentence. What does it mean to you personally? Exploring this, and exploring it deeply can help you stay in touch. How? That's up to you."
That's worth WAY more than 2 cents. :-)
" It's not easy to go solo on that, though I personally have found psychedelic plant medicines (incl. MJ) very helpful indeed. "
Two thumbs up, indeed 10 fingers up! I don't regard MJ as a "psychedelic" per se, but i do enjoy it a lot. They've ALL been very helpful. A big reason why i've gone way past where i used to be.
I practice yoga daily. I am a human being, and there are limitations as to how much "sublimation" can do. It is NOT a *permanent* substitute for actual sexual expression. And calling sexuality ""base" desires and impulses" is the denigration of a very basic and essential human impulse. What i'm exploring is simply more creative self-activity.
Base can also be interpreted as base of the spine. When the energy is raised to higher centers it can still be used to create things which is the nature of sexual energy.
It is also said when dissipated through lower centers, there is less available for the higher. What is the cause of the base shriveling if one is channeling it to higher centers?
Virology appears to be the new Alchemy backed by computer programs to mesmerize the world. Or a Virus is the invisible scapegoat to blame for whatever ails ya.
Any visit to a doctor, especially with a child in the last two decades will prove just how right you are about the scapegoat comment. It's always "a virus". I can't tell you how many doctors I fired as a mother.
Hi Eric, cant wait. Is the video of interview available anywhere?
Video is added to the program's page! It's there and also here
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RqM89Ld1Jp7j/
Thanks Eric. Just curious re the financial implications you got into in the last half hour of the interview. Do you have any thoughts on Catherine Austin Fitts (and for that matter CJ Hopkins, who is collaborating with her lately). She is very up with the play on the financial coup d'etat but is a complete virus enthusiast. It seems incredulous that people so up with the play could not entertain the science (or complete lack thereof) underlying virology.
She and CJ are unable to think outside the virus box. And what's worse in the sense of intent is that they both push virus existence in the context of the "lab-leak bio-weapon" because they think this works to promote their perspective.
Comment I left on Bitchute...obviously.
I found this on another channel, here on Bitchute and thankfully, they linked you so I HAD to come and like and sub and check out your other stuff. I'd seen you once before, but there wasn't a link and for some reason, you didn't come up in a search. It's like that with a lot of the "Team NO Virus" folks. Even here on the "free speech" platforms, the powers that ought not be employ their censorship tricks and treats. I also hopped over to your Substack and am VERY excited about your astrology posts and vids. I too, glean information from the space rocks and have been studying charts for a couple of years now and find it fascinating as well as fulfilling. (edited to add::: even more so once I found and read Simon Shack's book "The Tychos". It's free and comes with an amazing, interactive planetarium at tychos.space) I love Roland Legrand and while I have a lot of random "how to" books, his are my favorite for serious study. His videos are really good too. ABLAS on Youtube. But, back to Sam's wife...teehee! The Dr.'s Bailey are adorable and this is one of the best interviews I've seen Mark give. Your questions were spot on and it's such a pleasant surprise when the interviewer is almost as well versed in the subject matter as the interviewee. Your passion for the subject brings excellence to your work. Mark's paper was an amazing read and despite being a "Team NO Virus" member for over two years and a proud anti-vaxer for well over two decades, it kept my attention. His aplomb shone through and I really should send him an email of gratitude. Thank you both for your dedication to one of the most important issues of our day. We MUST fix this horrendous flaw in our thinking or it will be the death of us all. We must find and walk the correct path or we're bound to remain scattered and lost, seeking and never finding the truth. When everything you think you know turns out to be outright lies and fabrications, you can't live life to it's fullest. You just sorta bumble around in the dark.
Thank you for making sure the flashlight has fresh batteries. Now...let's hit some heads with it.
Godspeed and nicetameetcha!
Eric, i heard the interview a few days ago, this was the first time i heard the rest of the program. A couple of things to say about "the rest."
1. What is the public mood? (you expressed an inability to really tune in on what it is) From my limited experience in a very limited environment, Compliance Central, aka the San Francisco Bay Area (indeed in Berkeley, hard core believers), people were simply stunned into operating in a state in which thinking is rigorously evaded. Even in the "health freedom" community (right on re your description of it as being co-opted into the "lab-leak bio-weapon" narrative, turning into the biggest pusher of that narrative), this antipathy to thinking is rampant. People seem extra busy pushing the narrative of "the shots are so terrible, so deadly, and do nothing about 'COVID,'" oblivious as to how they are reinforcing the core narrative. FEAR rules.
2. Sexuality. What i am exploring is how to maintain touch with one's sexual being in spite of the fact that a future relationship is highly unlikely, due to demographic reality (age and isolation of non-believers) as well as personal issues which never got resolved over the last 31 years of involuntary celibacy, doubtful they could have been resolved under the rest of circumstances. I think maintaining touch is essential to retaining sanity. Porn doesn't work. So, how can one best use their fantasy, based upon life experiences and extrapolations from these?
Hi Jeffery,
Measuring or tapping into public mood depends on where you are standing. Legacy media is effectively tapping into the public mood of fear (and/or creating it) because they know their audience. The audience is primed for propaganda, being totally swarmed in digital fog, disembodied from grounded reality and wandering around in numbed out denial. I think this speaks as to why Eric can't feel people caring about anything, and not seeing "the wisdom of humanity welling up". Denial prevents that kind of response. Denial prevents people having to face the scorching truth. Avoidance of pain. Who wants to face that they have been duped and poisoned? That their whole family and friends and colleagues have been intentionally harmed? I don't think it is realistic to expect people to lean into that... unless or until they "have to". Unless or until the shit hits the fan. I personally don't see another way to break the trance of denial.
Eric et al have an audience, but it couldn't be described as "the public", being that it is still a comparatively small minority. That has the potential to change, which of course is what we, the minority, want.
Sexuality: So if I understand you correctly, what you are asking is, how do you stay in touch with your sexuality when you are on your own with that, yes? My 2 cents here is that I find it fundamental to self-proclaim yourself as a sexual being. It's more than just a simple sentence. What does it mean to you personally? Exploring this, and exploring it deeply can help you stay in touch. How? That's up to you. It's not easy to go solo on that, though I personally have found psychedelic plant medicines (incl. MJ) very helpful indeed. Beyond that I think it's possible to find online communities who are devoted to exploration, though that's not without pitfalls, particularly if porn doesn't work for you. Eric interviewed a sex worker in 2021 who was involved with clients who didn't want direct sexual contact, but rather someone to talk about sex with, with varying degrees of closeness.
I have also been celibate since Summer 2021 for obvious reasons, so I hear your pain when you refer to 31 years of involuntary celibacy. Don't give up on yourself.
Mostly I am talking about the topic of sexuality as a public presenter and sex educator.
Yep, that was my suggestion for something for you to discuss.
Eryca, thanks for a wonderful response.
"Legacy media is effectively tapping into the public mood of fear (and/or creating it) because they know their audience. The audience is primed for propaganda, being totally swarmed in digital fog, disembodied from grounded reality and wandering around in numbed out denial. I think this speaks as to why Eric can't feel people caring about anything, and not seeing "the wisdom of humanity welling up". Denial prevents that kind of response. Denial prevents people having to face the scorching truth. Avoidance of pain. Who wants to face that they have been duped and poisoned? "
WELL-stated, very well! I think there's even a worse aspect which Eric brought up, the form of denial which is increasingly afflicting the "health freedom" movement, people who think that they are breaking with the denial and seeing how things really are but who refuse to go very far, do not venture past what movement celebrity figures tell them, and react in an angry or even suppressive manner when they see others, especially people they know, go further than they have gone before. It makes them insecure.
" don't think it is realistic to expect people to lean into that... unless or until they "have to". Unless or until the shit hits the fan. "
How much shit has to hit the fan? :-) One would think there's been more than enough. I'm not sure what it takes. I didn't get past my support of the Vietnam War till first my brother came home and informed me (in a casual way, didn't mean to upset my world view) about what he'd seen and experienced, and second, till i had a close encounter with being drafted into the service in the form of a pre-induction physical (which never got to actual induction, luckily). I think Eric is doing a wonderful job at least getting out vital information, doing so while maintaining a very personal touch, not coming off like a super-rational detached scientist.
"My 2 cents here is that I find it fundamental to self-proclaim yourself as a sexual being. It's more than just a simple sentence. What does it mean to you personally? Exploring this, and exploring it deeply can help you stay in touch. How? That's up to you."
That's worth WAY more than 2 cents. :-)
" It's not easy to go solo on that, though I personally have found psychedelic plant medicines (incl. MJ) very helpful indeed. "
Two thumbs up, indeed 10 fingers up! I don't regard MJ as a "psychedelic" per se, but i do enjoy it a lot. They've ALL been very helpful. A big reason why i've gone way past where i used to be.
Online does not do it for me.
Have you looked into the subject of sublimation? (the channeling of “base” desires and impulses into more “elevated” pursuits), some pursue this through kundalini yoga, also described as spiritual alchemy https://schuyler-brown.medium.com/the-sublimation-of-desire-fdf4e45aa86f
I practice yoga daily. I am a human being, and there are limitations as to how much "sublimation" can do. It is NOT a *permanent* substitute for actual sexual expression. And calling sexuality ""base" desires and impulses" is the denigration of a very basic and essential human impulse. What i'm exploring is simply more creative self-activity.
Base can also be interpreted as base of the spine. When the energy is raised to higher centers it can still be used to create things which is the nature of sexual energy.
When the base shrivels, there's little to feed the higher centers.
It is also said when dissipated through lower centers, there is less available for the higher. What is the cause of the base shriveling if one is channeling it to higher centers?
This is Theosophical bullshit.