The leader of Children's Health Defense doesn't acknowledge that every government in the world admits they have no clinical sample of SARS-CoV-2. Why do all of his publications conceal this fact?
This is from the Planet Waves FM and Planet Waves editorial policy. Every publication needs a set of guiding principles it holds itself to, and that the public can hold itself to:
Science and Science Coverage
Planet Waves is part of the investigative tradition of reporting on scientific fraud. Our writers and advisors have covered topics including dioxin, polychlorinated biphenyls, Agent Orange and its use in the United States and Vietnam, Industrial Biotest Laboratories, AIDS, genetically modified organisms, glyphosate, nuclear power and the development of the atomic bomb. You will encounter those topics from time to time on our pages.
We draw the distinction between science and political science: between honest, data-driven inquiry, and corporate- and government-sponsored use of laboratories (whether government- or privately owned) that justify mass poisoning and actions that endanger life on planet Earth.
When it comes to the coverage of science in any form, our credo can be stated in four words: “Where is your data?”
In other words, our role as journalists is to hold science to the standards of science. The source of funding of any study is a valid and necessary consideration in the evaluation of the research.
Those claiming before the public to have the backing of science must do more than state an opinion or speculate. All assertions claiming to be based on science must be backed by data, methodology and repeated experiments, per the scientific method. Until that data is produced and verified, it is construed to be nonexistent.
The opinion of a scientist is not a scientific finding. Therefore, the opinions of scientists shall be clearly identified as such and distinguished from data-based scientific findings.
Chemicals, drugs, vaccines and new technology are not innocent until proven guilty; it is up to the manufacturer or purveyor of any chemical, technology or device to prove that their product is safe. The human race and its environment are not a test laboratory, and the planet and the human body are not toxic waste dumps.
Our editorial policy is to honor the precautionary principle: in the face of the unknown, the only sane course of action is to proceed with caution and to consider the potential worst case scenario. Then, see what the data says.
Are you saying that doing "good work" entitles someone to deceive the public, and then claim the public is not ready for the truth? Or that telling the truth has "opportunity costs"?
I hold myself and my readers to a higher standard. And I think they agree.
I don’t think anyone is ready to admit overpopulation and pollution control methods yet. But they are working on it by promoting every sexuality except straight and removing anything sexual from our viewing ( no more sex and violence just violence and gore [ see any horror film remake]).
Eric-your ability to Research, organize, study the issues until you understand and can articulate them. You verify everything, Turn over every stone, double and triple check every point, listen to all contradictory evidence. Wanting only the TRUTH that you must be able to understand or grasp however long It takes. Then and only then you write.
Readers -- I used to write a lot about Mike Fink. I mean it just went on and on, good thing he likes me. His case gets a file drawer in my office, and a map of his property hung on my kitchen wall while I worked on this story for FIVE YEARS.
*Five years just for part two, 2007-2013 geez 10 years ago. part one was written in 1997 and I tracked the issue between then and 2007 while I lived in Europe.
Also while I don't play chess, Mike does. And he taught me how to think like a chess player, five moves ahead, studying every last thing about your opponent.
Christine, this is your story — I just know how to tell it. As I said on my program last week, there is always a "covid truther" somewhere having a panic attack about you.
Robert F. Kennedy more or less has said why. He's a litigator and basically as he sees it, a political pragmatist who thinks the "no virus" gets in the way of his goals.
I don't think he started this way, because he was never in his history of litigating against injections confronted by the notion that germ theory and viruses are baseless, and the poison concoctions nothing but fraudulent money makers which can never be safe or effective.
I do think he's backed himself into this so as not to be smeared as an "anti-vaxxer" and taken the pragmatic road as have his paid for crew. That's his answer, and he's shown some shrewdness in fundraising and recruitment.
What Kennedy doesn't realize is the ultimate downside to his pragmatism - which could be a real killer.
Art, As a litigator he failed miserably in the State of NY when the vote to end the religious exemption for schools ended in a tie and the bill should have died on the floor. Of course, RFK Jr. and his sidekick Del Bigtree showed up at the capitol to grandstand with all of the anti-vaxxer parents who held these grifters in high esteem. RFK Jr. stated he would sue the state. Well guess what? He never did and gave some lame excuse.. Seriously is he a legit litigator?? These two are the worst of the worst of controlled operatives who basically single handedly ruined the organic Autism Awareness movements as well. They are nothing more than actors on the world stage if ya ask me. I loathe both of them. What could be more important than exposing the fact that ZERO viruses have ever been properly isolated and categorized to prove they not only cause disease, but are also contagious. I'm so sick of all of this BS.
The same happened with AIDS when Peter Duesberg was claimed a hero in denying HIV caused AIDS, but then chose to reinforce the existence of HIV and pathogenic viruses, stalling as Cowan and Lanka state the movement to put the entire virus myth to bed.
So, I definitely see your layered point. I was simply stating this "movement" has been hijacked, once again. What we need to understand while they use a pee shooter of court cases that get us no where they consume all sorts of resources and anxious audiences. Is that their intent? Or are they finding it quite lucrative to pursue this by a thousand court cases? Or is their audience the political class and not the people at large?
What I think is also worth mentioning is the notion that RFK, Jr. can not sell the idea to his followers. I find that incredulous. It could be his big funders may not go for the fact that there is no proof of a pathogenic virus, ever. (This virus belief system is a curious phenomenon. I think it's more of an authoritarian system. Why else are the so many who have never bout the story of "pathogenic viruses"? Because it's always sounded like a fairy tale.)
Hey Art, no I understand you get who these people really are. If you are not friends with Greg Wyatt on FB, he has a lot of dirt on Bigtree in particular because Greg was apart of the Vaxxed Movie production. both of his children are vaccine injured. It is exactly that ... multi-layered and involves lots of donor money. The whole idea that there are saviors out there like RFK Jr. and Bigtree in peoples corners is quite appealing to them because they don't have to do anything except show up in protest. And we know how protesting against government works... It does a big fat nothing. NO GOVERNMENT owns our bodily rights even if we should decide to send our children to their indoctrination centers. That is another thing most people do not care to challenge. Even if they don't believe that viruses are a hoax. The entire anti-vaxx Autism Awareness movement has been hijacked by these grifters who will slander anyone who challenges the official narrative, all the while acting like they really care about the injuries and deaths of children. I'm so sick of these people. I believe that RFK Jr. and Bigtree are also making money somehow from the pharmaceutical industry. I believe Greg has a lot of dirt on the two of them... at the very least, the layers of connections they have with very unsavory organizations all tied to pharma.
Yes Art I remember you too! If we were friends it is quite possible that FB removed you from my list. Since Im banned so often, they often take the opportunity to remove a bunch of friends. Isnt that nice? 🤬🤬🤬
sorry can't see what you're responding to here -- too many comments -- the Gardasil MDL has about 50 cases that have made it through the Vaccine Injury Program and out the other side unsettled; there are thousands more, and the MDL will set the precedent for how to settl them.
Just to clarify my last sentence. Having just watched Dr. Cowan's webinar and find his statement very compelling: People who continue to raise horrific stories (as do the Defenders and so-called "Freedom" movement) about the injections with no real scientific confirmation, are (and I paraphrase here) instilling a fear that puts the vulnerable who made a bad decision (for whatever reason) lives in jeopardy.
And isn't weaponized fear been the driver of this enter operation?
I had a "vaccine truther" who was referred to me for an interview pretty much hang up on me when I started asking specific questions like source of the samples. This was an MD/PhD who claimed to be part of this and that and the other team and there are nanoparticles and little things grow when you incubate them and all that. So I started asking a question or two and she was suddenly very busy and rushed off the phone. For the reasons you state, I am not doing this issue right now. Get me something solid, on paper, send me actual slides I can put under my own microscope...and maybe I'll do it.
Peter McCullough, et al are prime examples of what I think Cowan is pointing to. These are the "experts" who describe what they have no means of knowing to a public who are expected to know nothing and will listen to the expert "jargon" as gospel.
Francis Boyle has become the primary messenger of a lab leak that Kennedy has taken up, layering speculation upon speculation as if it makes it "truth". All of this follows the MO of the psy-op "anthrax attack" to push the Patriot Act. Boyle has a hammer and it's all nails.
Eric, as you know mind control works in pecular ways. I was wondering if you had discussed the so-called anti-imperial Left who could not see through this charade. Hedges has written about the decline of empire for much of his career and he did'nt really go into this scamdemic very deeply. I mean these guys attack corporate capitalism and militarism but they barely surface the pharmaceutical industry. It is quite remarkable.
The controlled opposition meme going on right now wants people to ignore fundamental issues, the ones you have highlighted in your post, surrounding their own epistemology. That is, their too afraid to question what they know is actually true and to ask critically very important questions.
If you watch the interview with Tim Truth and Dan Wilson on the injections, it will tell you how deep the indoctrination is, and it is quite concerning.
Yes and "controlled opposition" is def a meme at the moment. But the scale of this is just so enormous. But it's not unprecedented. If you can stand a little astrology, I encourage everyone to be familiar with this disaster, which emerged in the late 1970s and dragged on a while, and which is relevant today because it involves Roundup and all legacy pesticides, and the whole regulatory process:
I believe a new approach is needed.....I believe we need to attack that fact that EVERYTHING about virology is theoretical.....maybe ask ol' Kennedy to explain how contagion works and when it's ever been shown to occur in real life.....
Interestingly, he just interviewed Denis Rancourt, whose work implies the same, because the statistical evidence relates more closely to the level of poverty on the one hand and the nature of countermeasures on the other, but not at all to what you would see if there was any normal spread of a respiratory virus.
Yes, it is getting more absurd by the minute. I laugh at every new variant. I keep thinking the existence of the virus SARS CoV-2 is just the booby prize. So what if it exists, if it is not the cause, or merely a contributing factor, or a symptom... There was another similar study to Denis Rancourt sombody did for Lombardy with similar result - the distribution of the virus obeying stop signs and political boundaries, When are they going to get it they are looking at it the wrong way?
My impression is that truly popular sites cannot be truly honest, but the honest ones out of them give up some of the truth-telling for being able to say more than nothing. It is their readers' fault that they swallow the lies as well, hook, line, and sinker.
I've written about the phenomenon before, and it only resulted in losing a few ardent believers in their "saviors" (although RFK is not going to be there to protect them, when the time comes):
On the other hand, it looks like the truth is only acknowledged after people know it and they are expected to believe the rest of the lies (one of my best articles):
Hey there Ray, long time! Thank you for your comment. What if there is something else going on here? We now know some things about Twitter that would have been called freaky in 2021...we know there was direct supervision and molding of the narrative by a certain agency. We know that Facebook and others were essentially reporting to CDC.
At least as early as 2007, when Skype started recording ALL calls, the live collection of information has been around. Twitter and Fakebook are good for spreading "fake news," which can be used against the data collectors either by false info (bad idea) or by overwhelming info that contains several contradictions (that comes from human nature and computers cannot make sense of it).
Other than that, I don't give a flying whatever to who is reporting to whom. :)
Such as the Twitter files. Are you familiar with the Ramparts exposé on the CIA's taking over the National Student Association in the 1960s — a program which extended to women's lib, the Dalai Lama, and elsewhere? Many of our most venerated institutions have been funded through a network of shell nonprofits. Now we know that the FBI was running Twitter's editorial policy; we know that CDC was running Facebook's.
"On profound philosophical levels, virology is consonant with and arises out of the fundamental impulses of bourgeois ideology. It furthers the atomistic view which seeks for singular mechanistic causes, and elides the importance of environmental or synergistic processes. It maintains the fixation on genetic material as a core agent, and is in some sense, an extreme reification of the bourgeoisie’s conception of DNA (or, derivatively, RNA) as, in Dawkins’ words, driving us as if we were »gigantic lumbering robots« manipulated »by remote control."
"Virology is in some sense an even more fanatical permutation of this ideological predisposition, the elevation of genes to pure agents."
"Most significantly in our current moment, Virology has been one of the most powerful means of exculpating the ruling class from the wretchedness of the circumstances which they impose on the mass of the population. The true causes of the vast majority of supposedly viral illness– and this is implicitly recognized even by many mainstream virologists, who believe such conditions generate vulnerability to infection – are the simple, artificial consequences of class society, from malnutrition to poisoning.
The latter is perhaps the least well understood. Virology has worked as a general means for shifting the blame for illness from those who overwork, poison, and starve us onto a (prior to this year, generally understood as) uncontrollable force of nature. But it has also almost certainly been used in a much more targeted and conscious fashion."
"Yet the immediate and vulgar class interests of many on the organized left are an insufficient explanation here; across the demographics which dominate the leadership of the major left wing organizations in the West – above all clerks and knowledge workers of various sorts– there is a much deeper and more profound material and psychic investment in elite academic institutions and the ruling class ’science‹ they produce. It is central to the self-conception of this class that knowledge-production – even though funded by and produced on the terms of the ruling class – is somehow relatively autonomous and even self-actualizing. In particular, they are deeply invested in a certain conception of science, which sees itself as driven entirely or at least primarily by its own internal dynamics.
This class will admit that under certain circumstances science may be better or worse funded; important avenues of research may be ignored because they are not profitable; certain regimes (mostly sinister non-western boogeymen) may suppress certain elements of science. This may slow the progress of science, but science nonetheless progresses, more or less linearly, over time. Subscription to this article of faith allows them to perfunctorily reject the parallels noted above, between now well-recognized pseudosciences of the past and modern virology."
Allen - You are like a window to the sunshine. As a Marxist of 50 years, I have been jaw-dropped and dumb-struck, in face of the abject, what shall we say, capitulation, face down, of the Marxist "left" - in regards to this latest ruling class initiative. And INITIATIVE it is indeed, the words ambitious and audacious, simply can't describe - but, my concern is for the ostensible, er, "left" - ????
A very important Substack which I have shared with my subscribers.
My understanding of the fraud is that it's twofold. First there is the misuse of non-isolated samples placed in contaminated tissue cultures without controls. The second is the use of computer simulations which are used as "proof" that a novel virus has been found.
It seems the virologists don't even feel a need to conduct any real-world tests anymore and immediately declare victory by utilizing their "In silico" calculations.
Thanks much. I've come to the conclusion that attempting to dissuade those who recognize the mRNA vaccines are extremely dangerous but still believe in the basic tenets of virology (germ theory, contagion, etc.) is a dead end. They are wedded to the idea of deadly pathogens floating around and will vilify all those who demand some proof of their theories. In other words you don't question the core beliefs as it would destroy their entire belief system.
I'm just guessing here, but, if your current work is dependent on raising money to keep it going, and the money currently is rolling in sufficient amounts to keep you going, and, at this point, adopting what is (in "their" world) a controversial position related to your work and that fund raising might be in jeopardy if your steer a different tack from the one you have been steering so far, well, perhaps it'g best to steer your current course. It's all about the money; it's always all about the money.
they went from 3m to 7m to 16m in three years. If you doubled my budget twice, I would barely know what to do with the money. especially on that scale.
Your articles have amounted to one WOW after another, i'll just have to invent a new superlative for this one: WOW ZOW!! Sharing widely. Unfortunately, lots of people i know need to read this. Fortunately, it is here for them to read!! Thank you!!
Most of us hold opinions privately before we share them publically. Taking a public stand on something so paradigm shifting as "viruses don't exist" takes time. When you head an organization that has worked long and hard to defend the public from the poor actions of corporations and governments, there is a responsibility to take care with what you do and what you claim. CHD is a legal defense group, not a scientific one. And there are so many issues to be sorted through. Let's credit CHD for the work they are doing, encourage them to consider outlier views, and have patience that they are considering the issue but need time to respond. Your points and the work of others on "no virus" are well taken but it is a huge puzzle with many pieces that need explaining - what did actually happen? And it also takes time for outlier views to be proven. I give Mr. Kennedy much credit for interviewing Dane Wigington on geoengineering. Perhaps with time he and CHD will take a position on the "no virus" question. When/if they do, their opinion will likely be well considered and credible.
PS Do we not all need to remember that truth is subject to change? As is science.
I understand and agree with much of what you say. But I would add that truth does not need either of us to believe it, it either is or it is not.
Science is or should be a constant questioning, a debate, followed by the work to support it or to come up with new questions and try again.
We are at that point with this debate of the question of contagion. But the answer will topple many entrenched systems and most are very adhered to what they believe is true.
If Kennedy is honorable (and I am not saying he is or is not) I would wonder that he is not taking this question of virus or no virus on, is because the masses are not yet ready for this question. Even though the 'vaccine' industry rests on the idea of contagion and we will forever be pushed down this road we are presently on. (not me personally, I don't do pharma and I am outside the system itself)
It is an extremely important question, the question of contagion, with plenty of work done to support it. There is a beautiful simplicity of sense to it.
That no evidence of the existence a particle with the attributes and abilities assigned to a virus has ever been presented is not a huge puzzle,it is a simple matter.
I am a physician and researcher and serve on my hospital's Infection Prevention Committee. I openly challenged all 17 members of the committee to a debate on RTPCR, Asymptomatic Spread, Vaccine Effectiveness and the VAERS data and did not receive one taker. In California, I can loose my medical license by questioning the Covid narrative.
It it one thing to recognize that all power is relative, it is just as important to realize that this same power can be final and fatal.
The public has been brainwashed over generations into not questioning authority. People are enslaved in our debt-based economy.
When doctors are too afraid to question the "No Virus" concept, how easy would it be to have the public dismiss us as well.
My optimism for complete transparency is low; even though I live my life that way, the public is far too ignorant and polarized to accept these truths.
I read Virus Mania and Dissolving Delusions and agree that vaccines are a massive fraud.
To quote Alan Dulles on whether the public would believe the Warren Commission Report, he said, "It doesn't matter, Americans don't read!"
He was right.
Maybe it must start with guaranteeing bodily autonomy and the right to refuse vaccines.
Your work is a beacon for lonely physicians/scientists like me.
I think it’s because of the logical questions that would follow, leading to the legitimacy of the childhood schedule. It’s a horrible dream to wake up from.
It's BECAUSE of that damn "childhood schedule" that anyone with one iota of human decency is or SHOULD be screaming this from the highest mountain top!
People who're even slightly suspect about virology who don't...
I don't know how the USA could ever have gotten where it has with all the vial vials injected into adults let alone children. I wrote some different words for the Lizzie Borden axe murders.
https://planetwaves.net/terms-of-service-and-editorial-policy/
This is from the Planet Waves FM and Planet Waves editorial policy. Every publication needs a set of guiding principles it holds itself to, and that the public can hold itself to:
Science and Science Coverage
Planet Waves is part of the investigative tradition of reporting on scientific fraud. Our writers and advisors have covered topics including dioxin, polychlorinated biphenyls, Agent Orange and its use in the United States and Vietnam, Industrial Biotest Laboratories, AIDS, genetically modified organisms, glyphosate, nuclear power and the development of the atomic bomb. You will encounter those topics from time to time on our pages.
We draw the distinction between science and political science: between honest, data-driven inquiry, and corporate- and government-sponsored use of laboratories (whether government- or privately owned) that justify mass poisoning and actions that endanger life on planet Earth.
When it comes to the coverage of science in any form, our credo can be stated in four words: “Where is your data?”
In other words, our role as journalists is to hold science to the standards of science. The source of funding of any study is a valid and necessary consideration in the evaluation of the research.
Those claiming before the public to have the backing of science must do more than state an opinion or speculate. All assertions claiming to be based on science must be backed by data, methodology and repeated experiments, per the scientific method. Until that data is produced and verified, it is construed to be nonexistent.
The opinion of a scientist is not a scientific finding. Therefore, the opinions of scientists shall be clearly identified as such and distinguished from data-based scientific findings.
Chemicals, drugs, vaccines and new technology are not innocent until proven guilty; it is up to the manufacturer or purveyor of any chemical, technology or device to prove that their product is safe. The human race and its environment are not a test laboratory, and the planet and the human body are not toxic waste dumps.
Our editorial policy is to honor the precautionary principle: in the face of the unknown, the only sane course of action is to proceed with caution and to consider the potential worst case scenario. Then, see what the data says.
Are you saying that doing "good work" entitles someone to deceive the public, and then claim the public is not ready for the truth? Or that telling the truth has "opportunity costs"?
I hold myself and my readers to a higher standard. And I think they agree.
I don’t think anyone is ready to admit overpopulation and pollution control methods yet. But they are working on it by promoting every sexuality except straight and removing anything sexual from our viewing ( no more sex and violence just violence and gore [ see any horror film remake]).
Eric-your ability to Research, organize, study the issues until you understand and can articulate them. You verify everything, Turn over every stone, double and triple check every point, listen to all contradictory evidence. Wanting only the TRUTH that you must be able to understand or grasp however long It takes. Then and only then you write.
Thank you!
Your Brilliant.
Good evening!
Readers -- I used to write a lot about Mike Fink. I mean it just went on and on, good thing he likes me. His case gets a file drawer in my office, and a map of his property hung on my kitchen wall while I worked on this story for FIVE YEARS.
https://planetwaves.net/moving-mountains/
*Five years just for part two, 2007-2013 geez 10 years ago. part one was written in 1997 and I tracked the issue between then and 2007 while I lived in Europe.
Also while I don't play chess, Mike does. And he taught me how to think like a chess player, five moves ahead, studying every last thing about your opponent.
Good work
Another great article, thank you Eric!
Here is Mary's "excellent" email, page 4:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/RFK-Jr-Holland-Dec-2022-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Christine, this is your story — I just know how to tell it. As I said on my program last week, there is always a "covid truther" somewhere having a panic attack about you.
You are doing a splendid job, and I'm happy to leave it to the pro :)
Yes, I hope they live in fear, never knowing know when I'll strike. Just kidding, lol.
Well not really. Speaking of, no response yet from Del:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Del-query-redacted.pdf
what can you say to a runaway train?
Robert F. Kennedy more or less has said why. He's a litigator and basically as he sees it, a political pragmatist who thinks the "no virus" gets in the way of his goals.
I don't think he started this way, because he was never in his history of litigating against injections confronted by the notion that germ theory and viruses are baseless, and the poison concoctions nothing but fraudulent money makers which can never be safe or effective.
I do think he's backed himself into this so as not to be smeared as an "anti-vaxxer" and taken the pragmatic road as have his paid for crew. That's his answer, and he's shown some shrewdness in fundraising and recruitment.
What Kennedy doesn't realize is the ultimate downside to his pragmatism - which could be a real killer.
Art, As a litigator he failed miserably in the State of NY when the vote to end the religious exemption for schools ended in a tie and the bill should have died on the floor. Of course, RFK Jr. and his sidekick Del Bigtree showed up at the capitol to grandstand with all of the anti-vaxxer parents who held these grifters in high esteem. RFK Jr. stated he would sue the state. Well guess what? He never did and gave some lame excuse.. Seriously is he a legit litigator?? These two are the worst of the worst of controlled operatives who basically single handedly ruined the organic Autism Awareness movements as well. They are nothing more than actors on the world stage if ya ask me. I loathe both of them. What could be more important than exposing the fact that ZERO viruses have ever been properly isolated and categorized to prove they not only cause disease, but are also contagious. I'm so sick of all of this BS.
The same happened with AIDS when Peter Duesberg was claimed a hero in denying HIV caused AIDS, but then chose to reinforce the existence of HIV and pathogenic viruses, stalling as Cowan and Lanka state the movement to put the entire virus myth to bed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tW9encIUer5W/
So, I definitely see your layered point. I was simply stating this "movement" has been hijacked, once again. What we need to understand while they use a pee shooter of court cases that get us no where they consume all sorts of resources and anxious audiences. Is that their intent? Or are they finding it quite lucrative to pursue this by a thousand court cases? Or is their audience the political class and not the people at large?
What I think is also worth mentioning is the notion that RFK, Jr. can not sell the idea to his followers. I find that incredulous. It could be his big funders may not go for the fact that there is no proof of a pathogenic virus, ever. (This virus belief system is a curious phenomenon. I think it's more of an authoritarian system. Why else are the so many who have never bout the story of "pathogenic viruses"? Because it's always sounded like a fairy tale.)
Hey Art, no I understand you get who these people really are. If you are not friends with Greg Wyatt on FB, he has a lot of dirt on Bigtree in particular because Greg was apart of the Vaxxed Movie production. both of his children are vaccine injured. It is exactly that ... multi-layered and involves lots of donor money. The whole idea that there are saviors out there like RFK Jr. and Bigtree in peoples corners is quite appealing to them because they don't have to do anything except show up in protest. And we know how protesting against government works... It does a big fat nothing. NO GOVERNMENT owns our bodily rights even if we should decide to send our children to their indoctrination centers. That is another thing most people do not care to challenge. Even if they don't believe that viruses are a hoax. The entire anti-vaxx Autism Awareness movement has been hijacked by these grifters who will slander anyone who challenges the official narrative, all the while acting like they really care about the injuries and deaths of children. I'm so sick of these people. I believe that RFK Jr. and Bigtree are also making money somehow from the pharmaceutical industry. I believe Greg has a lot of dirt on the two of them... at the very least, the layers of connections they have with very unsavory organizations all tied to pharma.
April I remember you from FB. I limit FB given its surveillance.
I think we use to have some great exchanges.
Yes Art I remember you too! If we were friends it is quite possible that FB removed you from my list. Since Im banned so often, they often take the opportunity to remove a bunch of friends. Isnt that nice? 🤬🤬🤬
April, when you have the evidence to prove RFKJr and Bigtree are “making money somehow from the Pharmaceutical industry”, please be sure to provide.
He won a litigation against Monsanto and thats where i first heard his activity
Never heard of that case. I cover Monsanto. He may have been "of counsel" like he is in the Gardasil MDL.
Ive come to understand theres tens of thousands of unsettled cases? You cover all of them? Especially in the gardasil umbrella is that sound close?
sorry can't see what you're responding to here -- too many comments -- the Gardasil MDL has about 50 cases that have made it through the Vaccine Injury Program and out the other side unsettled; there are thousands more, and the MDL will set the precedent for how to settl them.
Just to clarify my last sentence. Having just watched Dr. Cowan's webinar and find his statement very compelling: People who continue to raise horrific stories (as do the Defenders and so-called "Freedom" movement) about the injections with no real scientific confirmation, are (and I paraphrase here) instilling a fear that puts the vulnerable who made a bad decision (for whatever reason) lives in jeopardy.
And isn't weaponized fear been the driver of this enter operation?
I had a "vaccine truther" who was referred to me for an interview pretty much hang up on me when I started asking specific questions like source of the samples. This was an MD/PhD who claimed to be part of this and that and the other team and there are nanoparticles and little things grow when you incubate them and all that. So I started asking a question or two and she was suddenly very busy and rushed off the phone. For the reasons you state, I am not doing this issue right now. Get me something solid, on paper, send me actual slides I can put under my own microscope...and maybe I'll do it.
Peter McCullough, et al are prime examples of what I think Cowan is pointing to. These are the "experts" who describe what they have no means of knowing to a public who are expected to know nothing and will listen to the expert "jargon" as gospel.
Francis Boyle has become the primary messenger of a lab leak that Kennedy has taken up, layering speculation upon speculation as if it makes it "truth". All of this follows the MO of the psy-op "anthrax attack" to push the Patriot Act. Boyle has a hammer and it's all nails.
Eric, as you know mind control works in pecular ways. I was wondering if you had discussed the so-called anti-imperial Left who could not see through this charade. Hedges has written about the decline of empire for much of his career and he did'nt really go into this scamdemic very deeply. I mean these guys attack corporate capitalism and militarism but they barely surface the pharmaceutical industry. It is quite remarkable.
The controlled opposition meme going on right now wants people to ignore fundamental issues, the ones you have highlighted in your post, surrounding their own epistemology. That is, their too afraid to question what they know is actually true and to ask critically very important questions.
If you watch the interview with Tim Truth and Dan Wilson on the injections, it will tell you how deep the indoctrination is, and it is quite concerning.
Yes and "controlled opposition" is def a meme at the moment. But the scale of this is just so enormous. But it's not unprecedented. If you can stand a little astrology, I encourage everyone to be familiar with this disaster, which emerged in the late 1970s and dragged on a while, and which is relevant today because it involves Roundup and all legacy pesticides, and the whole regulatory process:
https://planetwaves.net/astrologynews/1969406404.html
OMG.
The charts gave me chills.
The astrology is what brought me here! I'll be having my own Chiron Return coming up someday soon. Sometimes the search bar does work!
I stayed for the absolutely brilliant bullshit detection.
I believe a new approach is needed.....I believe we need to attack that fact that EVERYTHING about virology is theoretical.....maybe ask ol' Kennedy to explain how contagion works and when it's ever been shown to occur in real life.....
Indeed so. Current virology theory fundamentally flawed. No virus, man or beast is contagious.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
Interestingly, he just interviewed Denis Rancourt, whose work implies the same, because the statistical evidence relates more closely to the level of poverty on the one hand and the nature of countermeasures on the other, but not at all to what you would see if there was any normal spread of a respiratory virus.
The poor but not prisoners and the homeless; and not in India or Africa. This is worse than HIV ending at the edge of a zip code in San Francisco.
Hilarious, but the upshot is, the germ theory paradigm is teetering, and all of virology is in a drafty position.
Their asses are in the wind!
Yes, it is getting more absurd by the minute. I laugh at every new variant. I keep thinking the existence of the virus SARS CoV-2 is just the booby prize. So what if it exists, if it is not the cause, or merely a contributing factor, or a symptom... There was another similar study to Denis Rancourt sombody did for Lombardy with similar result - the distribution of the virus obeying stop signs and political boundaries, When are they going to get it they are looking at it the wrong way?
Absurd as you say. I did my own ridicule of the nonsense.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/12/02/various-variants-covid-19/
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/05/11/100-up-and-stupid-20-variants/
Current virology theory is fundamentally flawed as the issue is toxic poisoning.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
My impression is that truly popular sites cannot be truly honest, but the honest ones out of them give up some of the truth-telling for being able to say more than nothing. It is their readers' fault that they swallow the lies as well, hook, line, and sinker.
I've written about the phenomenon before, and it only resulted in losing a few ardent believers in their "saviors" (although RFK is not going to be there to protect them, when the time comes):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-contradicts-himself
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/examples-of-disinfo-made-me-lose
On the other hand, it looks like the truth is only acknowledged after people know it and they are expected to believe the rest of the lies (one of my best articles):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-do-lies-become-the-truth
Hey there Ray, long time! Thank you for your comment. What if there is something else going on here? We now know some things about Twitter that would have been called freaky in 2021...we know there was direct supervision and molding of the narrative by a certain agency. We know that Facebook and others were essentially reporting to CDC.
At least as early as 2007, when Skype started recording ALL calls, the live collection of information has been around. Twitter and Fakebook are good for spreading "fake news," which can be used against the data collectors either by false info (bad idea) or by overwhelming info that contains several contradictions (that comes from human nature and computers cannot make sense of it).
Other than that, I don't give a flying whatever to who is reporting to whom. :)
Now, Ray, you haven't seen the documents yet.
Such as?
Such as the Twitter files. Are you familiar with the Ramparts exposé on the CIA's taking over the National Student Association in the 1960s — a program which extended to women's lib, the Dalai Lama, and elsewhere? Many of our most venerated institutions have been funded through a network of shell nonprofits. Now we know that the FBI was running Twitter's editorial policy; we know that CDC was running Facebook's.
Here is the original article from Ramparts about the National Student Association. This was part of a much larger program.
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/nsa-cia.pdf
Wanted to make sure everyone has seen this long, excellent article with a few salient quotes:
"Virology as Ideology. A Critique of Ruling Class Pseudoscience – Part 1: Science and Class Society"
https://magma-magazin.su/2023/01/t-mohr/virology-as-ideology-a-critique-of-ruling-class-pseudoscience-part-1-science-and-class-society/
Virology as Ideology
"On profound philosophical levels, virology is consonant with and arises out of the fundamental impulses of bourgeois ideology. It furthers the atomistic view which seeks for singular mechanistic causes, and elides the importance of environmental or synergistic processes. It maintains the fixation on genetic material as a core agent, and is in some sense, an extreme reification of the bourgeoisie’s conception of DNA (or, derivatively, RNA) as, in Dawkins’ words, driving us as if we were »gigantic lumbering robots« manipulated »by remote control."
"Virology is in some sense an even more fanatical permutation of this ideological predisposition, the elevation of genes to pure agents."
"Most significantly in our current moment, Virology has been one of the most powerful means of exculpating the ruling class from the wretchedness of the circumstances which they impose on the mass of the population. The true causes of the vast majority of supposedly viral illness– and this is implicitly recognized even by many mainstream virologists, who believe such conditions generate vulnerability to infection – are the simple, artificial consequences of class society, from malnutrition to poisoning.
The latter is perhaps the least well understood. Virology has worked as a general means for shifting the blame for illness from those who overwork, poison, and starve us onto a (prior to this year, generally understood as) uncontrollable force of nature. But it has also almost certainly been used in a much more targeted and conscious fashion."
"Yet the immediate and vulgar class interests of many on the organized left are an insufficient explanation here; across the demographics which dominate the leadership of the major left wing organizations in the West – above all clerks and knowledge workers of various sorts– there is a much deeper and more profound material and psychic investment in elite academic institutions and the ruling class ’science‹ they produce. It is central to the self-conception of this class that knowledge-production – even though funded by and produced on the terms of the ruling class – is somehow relatively autonomous and even self-actualizing. In particular, they are deeply invested in a certain conception of science, which sees itself as driven entirely or at least primarily by its own internal dynamics.
This class will admit that under certain circumstances science may be better or worse funded; important avenues of research may be ignored because they are not profitable; certain regimes (mostly sinister non-western boogeymen) may suppress certain elements of science. This may slow the progress of science, but science nonetheless progresses, more or less linearly, over time. Subscription to this article of faith allows them to perfunctorily reject the parallels noted above, between now well-recognized pseudosciences of the past and modern virology."
Allen - You are like a window to the sunshine. As a Marxist of 50 years, I have been jaw-dropped and dumb-struck, in face of the abject, what shall we say, capitulation, face down, of the Marxist "left" - in regards to this latest ruling class initiative. And INITIATIVE it is indeed, the words ambitious and audacious, simply can't describe - but, my concern is for the ostensible, er, "left" - ????
A very important Substack which I have shared with my subscribers.
My understanding of the fraud is that it's twofold. First there is the misuse of non-isolated samples placed in contaminated tissue cultures without controls. The second is the use of computer simulations which are used as "proof" that a novel virus has been found.
It seems the virologists don't even feel a need to conduct any real-world tests anymore and immediately declare victory by utilizing their "In silico" calculations.
Listen to THE DISH., a song about the fraud of Virology. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-dish
The anthem of the medical freedom movement. Watch the hit music video FOREVER FREEDOM BRIGADE. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/forever-freedom-brigade
BONUS: Free Download. THE ALTERNATIVE COVID-19 NARRATIVE HANDBOOK. A Collection of useful links. Get it here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-alternative-covid-narrative-handbook
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
Love "The Dish" in particular
Thanks much. I've come to the conclusion that attempting to dissuade those who recognize the mRNA vaccines are extremely dangerous but still believe in the basic tenets of virology (germ theory, contagion, etc.) is a dead end. They are wedded to the idea of deadly pathogens floating around and will vilify all those who demand some proof of their theories. In other words you don't question the core beliefs as it would destroy their entire belief system.
I'm just guessing here, but, if your current work is dependent on raising money to keep it going, and the money currently is rolling in sufficient amounts to keep you going, and, at this point, adopting what is (in "their" world) a controversial position related to your work and that fund raising might be in jeopardy if your steer a different tack from the one you have been steering so far, well, perhaps it'g best to steer your current course. It's all about the money; it's always all about the money.
they went from 3m to 7m to 16m in three years. If you doubled my budget twice, I would barely know what to do with the money. especially on that scale.
Your articles have amounted to one WOW after another, i'll just have to invent a new superlative for this one: WOW ZOW!! Sharing widely. Unfortunately, lots of people i know need to read this. Fortunately, it is here for them to read!! Thank you!!
Most of us hold opinions privately before we share them publically. Taking a public stand on something so paradigm shifting as "viruses don't exist" takes time. When you head an organization that has worked long and hard to defend the public from the poor actions of corporations and governments, there is a responsibility to take care with what you do and what you claim. CHD is a legal defense group, not a scientific one. And there are so many issues to be sorted through. Let's credit CHD for the work they are doing, encourage them to consider outlier views, and have patience that they are considering the issue but need time to respond. Your points and the work of others on "no virus" are well taken but it is a huge puzzle with many pieces that need explaining - what did actually happen? And it also takes time for outlier views to be proven. I give Mr. Kennedy much credit for interviewing Dane Wigington on geoengineering. Perhaps with time he and CHD will take a position on the "no virus" question. When/if they do, their opinion will likely be well considered and credible.
PS Do we not all need to remember that truth is subject to change? As is science.
I understand and agree with much of what you say. But I would add that truth does not need either of us to believe it, it either is or it is not.
Science is or should be a constant questioning, a debate, followed by the work to support it or to come up with new questions and try again.
We are at that point with this debate of the question of contagion. But the answer will topple many entrenched systems and most are very adhered to what they believe is true.
If Kennedy is honorable (and I am not saying he is or is not) I would wonder that he is not taking this question of virus or no virus on, is because the masses are not yet ready for this question. Even though the 'vaccine' industry rests on the idea of contagion and we will forever be pushed down this road we are presently on. (not me personally, I don't do pharma and I am outside the system itself)
It is an extremely important question, the question of contagion, with plenty of work done to support it. There is a beautiful simplicity of sense to it.
That no evidence of the existence a particle with the attributes and abilities assigned to a virus has ever been presented is not a huge puzzle,it is a simple matter.
Eric,
I am a physician and researcher and serve on my hospital's Infection Prevention Committee. I openly challenged all 17 members of the committee to a debate on RTPCR, Asymptomatic Spread, Vaccine Effectiveness and the VAERS data and did not receive one taker. In California, I can loose my medical license by questioning the Covid narrative.
It it one thing to recognize that all power is relative, it is just as important to realize that this same power can be final and fatal.
The public has been brainwashed over generations into not questioning authority. People are enslaved in our debt-based economy.
When doctors are too afraid to question the "No Virus" concept, how easy would it be to have the public dismiss us as well.
My optimism for complete transparency is low; even though I live my life that way, the public is far too ignorant and polarized to accept these truths.
I read Virus Mania and Dissolving Delusions and agree that vaccines are a massive fraud.
To quote Alan Dulles on whether the public would believe the Warren Commission Report, he said, "It doesn't matter, Americans don't read!"
He was right.
Maybe it must start with guaranteeing bodily autonomy and the right to refuse vaccines.
Your work is a beacon for lonely physicians/scientists like me.
I think it’s because of the logical questions that would follow, leading to the legitimacy of the childhood schedule. It’s a horrible dream to wake up from.
It's BECAUSE of that damn "childhood schedule" that anyone with one iota of human decency is or SHOULD be screaming this from the highest mountain top!
People who're even slightly suspect about virology who don't...
Are Evil in my book.
I don't know how the USA could ever have gotten where it has with all the vial vials injected into adults let alone children. I wrote some different words for the Lizzie Borden axe murders.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2023/01/24/joseph-biden-took-an-axe/
lol!
I think there are now 72 "required" vaccines for the children...pre-Convid.
Thank God I knew better than to inject my baby with that garbage!
I would be interested to understand the breakdown to arrive at 72, but I got 36 as minimum from the links. But even one is one too many.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html
Add them up!
Ah...some aren't required. Just recommended.
Some people are stuck on a loop, like in the series Westworld. They say, “That doesn’t look like anything to me.”