Share this comment
Dr Fiala said it well: what was followed was not science, but a business plan.
The highlight for me started around 35:40, when he began discussing how the PCR does NOT look for a full genome (it cannot), but for a short segment of nucleic acids which is (ALLEGEDLY) part of that genome. He used the analogy of looking for a particular screw…
© 2025 Chiron Return, Inc.
Substack is the home for great culture
Dr Fiala said it well: what was followed was not science, but a business plan.
The highlight for me started around 35:40, when he began discussing how the PCR does NOT look for a full genome (it cannot), but for a short segment of nucleic acids which is (ALLEGEDLY) part of that genome. He used the analogy of looking for a particular screw from a particular vehicle make and using that to claim the presence of the car. And then Eric pointed out that in fact the segment came not from a known organism, but from an AI-created computer model alleged to be that organism, SARS-CoV-2.
Unfortunate that right after came a gaff, a claim by Dr Fiala that antibody tests ARE accurate, though not real proofs, as with the AIDS antibody tests not showing someone is ill, as supposedly antibodies protest the individual from infections. In fact, the antibody test is just as inaccurate under the circumstances, as the specific proteins known as antibodies have not been shown to be unique to specific viruses, and in the case of SARS-CoV-2 cannot be shown to be so, since there are no samples of actual SARS-CoV-2 with which to authenticate the antibody test. Indeed, there are no samples of ANY "coronavirus" with which to authenticate the antibody test, just as with the PCR test. The antibody test is in fact being massively used, as with home testing kits (often used in medical offices or border crossings or... because the test is rapd), and it is just as inaccurate as the PCR, if not worse.
But overall, a great interview. I do wish someone would inform Dr Fiala of this, as we seek to make everything "just exactly perfect." DAMN all these “health freedom” celebrities like RFK Jr, Del Bigtree, Doctors Nass, Kory, Malone, McCullough,… who continue to push the "Pandemic"/"COVID-19"/"SARS-Cov-2” disinformation fraud narrative, enabling future operations and the cover up of mega-fraud, tyranny and mass murder by medical authorities.
No. Instead, they got new "global health regulations approved." The Treaty was a ruse, while the more significant Regulations were changed. See James Roguski's Substack.
James Roguski reports that while WHO treaty negotiations are stalled, an agreement has been reached regarding the more important International Health Regulations. The change in regulations was indeed an end-run around the Treaty matter.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-amendments-to-the-ihr-have-been
The Amendments to the IHR have been adopted. The 77th World Health Assembly HAS adopted a substantial package of amendments to the International Health Regulations. We the People have suffered a stunning defeat. The battle continues. James Roguski, 6/1/24.