Team Bailey has produced a new book, called The Final Pandemic. It's an easy-to-follow exploration of the sham of virology and the theory of contagion.
My comments. PHENOMENAL interview. Some key points were covered. The alleged virus genome is an “in silico” entity. It is nothing but a computer file filled with code, assembled out of short strands of code corresponding to short strands of nucleic acid found in a cell culture experiment. The strands are the results of mixing extracts from humans with tissue, most commonly green monkey kidney cells. antibiotics (poisonous to kidney cells), and nutrients. This stew is allowed to brew, and is then mixed, including the cutting up of all nucleic acid segments into ones shorter than around 5-600 base pairs, translating into code, and loading into a computer program or two or more, and using software to do the assembly.
There is a deliberate attempt to call this “sequencing,” making it seem just like taking DNA from known organisms and breaking it down into ordered chains of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine (A, C, G, T), the four basic genetic nucleic acids (RNA has uracil instead of thymine, and any which is in the mix is changed via an additive into thymine). Something made via assembling pieces whose origin is never established (unknown provenance), an entity which exists only in a computer and has never been shown to actually exist in nature, let alone shown to be pathogenic, is being presented as a real existing physical organism.
In fact, this computer-only entity is used as the basis for designing tests like the PCR which then are said to determine whether someone has ‘COVID” (or indeed anything else). This is done by providing the test with short segments of code which are alleged to come from this compute-only alleged entity. This has been a testing pandemic. And there is a history of creating stories about viruses and alleging that they account for sicknesses which are actually the result of toxic chemicals degrading our environment.
And people go along out of fear. And/or because they are invested in the idea that “i got sick with “COVID,” family members got it, friends got it….,” or because that’s what a celebrity they trust in says is true, or because they don’t trust their own understanding of physical reality at all (especially in regarding to health) and believe “experts,”…. For example, I had the experience of a decades-long friend attack me for being out of touch with modern science and not understanding that “experts” don’t need to do physical explorations, they can just use computers, and that all my friends who say otherwise (including the ones with solid science credentials) know nothing (he himself has never finished community college!). He is in charge of five (!) Facebook groups.
I sure hope that this video and the book which Doctors Mark and Sam Bailey have released can help widen true understanding and push back the night of know nothingness. Cockroaches scurry off once the lights are turned on.
Nice interview. Yes, while the latin terms, "in vivo" (in a living organism,) and "in vitro" (basically, in a glass test tube, outside of a living organism) are traditional biological laboratory terms, "in silico" is a non-biological term arising from the concept of "on a computer chip" (made from silicon) coined to sound similar to the existing familiar biological terms, but which is defined as "in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation" (Merriam-Webster.)
I am grateful for the contributions you both are making and have been making to navigating the confusion and corruption of these times. You have both given me so much through pursuing mental clarity, with an openhearted steadiness and determination. All of what Eric says here at the start of the interview in appreciation for Mark, I could also extend to him as appreciations for the way he has contributed over the past few years.
Many people like me are with you both. I hope our support through giving you our attention, financial support and love are fuel for your work. Thank You
Gu in short, is the ancient Chinese symbol for extreme pathological yin. It represents darkness, poison, betrayal, black magic, backstabbing murder and in medical terms, progressive organ decay accompanied by tortuous pain and insanity. Since the beginning of Chinese writing 3,500 years ago, the Chinese pictogram portrayed three worms squirming in a vessel. The symbol represents the widespread ancient practice of "black alchemy." Many traditional medical texts define Gu as the verminous manifestation of evil and disease that appears when a wide variety of toxic worms or substances are locked into a vessel, where they naturally become each others prey. After a period of several months, only one worm/ snake remains, which is said to contain the vicious and toxic potential of all the others and used to poison the population in order to take control of their personal property. Therefore, according to Classical Chinese Medicine, a Gu syndrome can be classified as an early example of biological warfare.
Thanks, Eric and Mark. I need to look into the history of germ theory. In the meantime, are there any microorganisms that have been proven to cause disease? For example, those found in areas with poor sanitation? If not, what is the purpose of the immune system? Thanks!
I'm currently living in Mexico since 2021. I practiced Classical Chinese Medicine and acupuncture in the Hudson Valley for over 20 years. I might also add that I did not close my practice at anytime in 2020 and effectively treated patients within the paradigm of Classical Chinese medicine. I'm still heartbroken that my colleagues abandoned their patients and medicine so easily and and fell lockstep with the "official reality." They ignored and discarded 3,000 years of wisdom and data points that clearly indicated otherwise.
Eric, I've been a big fan since you began at The Chronogram and follow PWFM shows regularly. I deeply appreciate your work.
I think ancient wisdom is relevant to modern disease and the strange times we are living in. I think your listeners might benefit from hearing my perspective as we collectively question and wrestle with the dominant medical paradigm and their applied philosophies.
ALL medicine is applied philosophy. What we are experiencing now is the breakdown of the story we call, biomedicine. We desperately need authentic paradigms to describe the very REAL physical, emotional, and spiritual suffering of our times. Eric's discussion with Dr. Baily scratches the surface of the fraudulent philosophy and dominant paradigm of western medicine, but it fails to acknowledge the genuine suffering and true origins of suffering for what the story makers have branded, and marketed to us as covid and the covid injections. Perhaps it will take a medical anthropologist to accurately report the whole story in a way that makes sense to people's very real suffering.
Thanks for being curious. The sinology does not specify.
Classical Chinese Medicine is its own complete system of medicine. It is not allopathic medicine as you stated. It has its own worldview, art of diagnosis and treatment methods.
Great interview, thank you Eric. Yes, I recall Drosten (in his paper) stated this "new" disease resembled SARS based on social media posts. And this is why they constructed the primers (based on SARS) without having isolated the virus. lol
Great interview...what about that PREP drug...where people are told to take this drug BEFORE they hook up with a sexual partner so they don't get AIDs. Think about all the harm that's being done with these new drugs. I understand that AZT's toxicity has been decreased so that people can live longer taking the drug, thinking they need to take it all their lives to keep the virus from becoming full blown AIDS, but they are still told that AIDS will eventually kill them and eventually the AZT cocktail will do just that and the death will be blamed on AIDs. Looking forward to your 40th anniversary AIDs program, Eric.
My comments. PHENOMENAL interview. Some key points were covered. The alleged virus genome is an “in silico” entity. It is nothing but a computer file filled with code, assembled out of short strands of code corresponding to short strands of nucleic acid found in a cell culture experiment. The strands are the results of mixing extracts from humans with tissue, most commonly green monkey kidney cells. antibiotics (poisonous to kidney cells), and nutrients. This stew is allowed to brew, and is then mixed, including the cutting up of all nucleic acid segments into ones shorter than around 5-600 base pairs, translating into code, and loading into a computer program or two or more, and using software to do the assembly.
There is a deliberate attempt to call this “sequencing,” making it seem just like taking DNA from known organisms and breaking it down into ordered chains of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine (A, C, G, T), the four basic genetic nucleic acids (RNA has uracil instead of thymine, and any which is in the mix is changed via an additive into thymine). Something made via assembling pieces whose origin is never established (unknown provenance), an entity which exists only in a computer and has never been shown to actually exist in nature, let alone shown to be pathogenic, is being presented as a real existing physical organism.
In fact, this computer-only entity is used as the basis for designing tests like the PCR which then are said to determine whether someone has ‘COVID” (or indeed anything else). This is done by providing the test with short segments of code which are alleged to come from this compute-only alleged entity. This has been a testing pandemic. And there is a history of creating stories about viruses and alleging that they account for sicknesses which are actually the result of toxic chemicals degrading our environment.
And people go along out of fear. And/or because they are invested in the idea that “i got sick with “COVID,” family members got it, friends got it….,” or because that’s what a celebrity they trust in says is true, or because they don’t trust their own understanding of physical reality at all (especially in regarding to health) and believe “experts,”…. For example, I had the experience of a decades-long friend attack me for being out of touch with modern science and not understanding that “experts” don’t need to do physical explorations, they can just use computers, and that all my friends who say otherwise (including the ones with solid science credentials) know nothing (he himself has never finished community college!). He is in charge of five (!) Facebook groups.
I sure hope that this video and the book which Doctors Mark and Sam Bailey have released can help widen true understanding and push back the night of know nothingness. Cockroaches scurry off once the lights are turned on.
Certainly can't be expecting virologists to admit any of this.
It'd be like the Pope saying that there's no God.
Nice interview. Yes, while the latin terms, "in vivo" (in a living organism,) and "in vitro" (basically, in a glass test tube, outside of a living organism) are traditional biological laboratory terms, "in silico" is a non-biological term arising from the concept of "on a computer chip" (made from silicon) coined to sound similar to the existing familiar biological terms, but which is defined as "in or on a computer : done or produced by using computer software or simulation" (Merriam-Webster.)
I am grateful for the contributions you both are making and have been making to navigating the confusion and corruption of these times. You have both given me so much through pursuing mental clarity, with an openhearted steadiness and determination. All of what Eric says here at the start of the interview in appreciation for Mark, I could also extend to him as appreciations for the way he has contributed over the past few years.
Many people like me are with you both. I hope our support through giving you our attention, financial support and love are fuel for your work. Thank You
You guys are a blessing. Thanks again to the pair of you.
Your interviewing style, Eric, is as good as enjoying a steamy cup of organic hot chocolate.
Great explanation of in silico modeling and sequencing.
Gu in short, is the ancient Chinese symbol for extreme pathological yin. It represents darkness, poison, betrayal, black magic, backstabbing murder and in medical terms, progressive organ decay accompanied by tortuous pain and insanity. Since the beginning of Chinese writing 3,500 years ago, the Chinese pictogram portrayed three worms squirming in a vessel. The symbol represents the widespread ancient practice of "black alchemy." Many traditional medical texts define Gu as the verminous manifestation of evil and disease that appears when a wide variety of toxic worms or substances are locked into a vessel, where they naturally become each others prey. After a period of several months, only one worm/ snake remains, which is said to contain the vicious and toxic potential of all the others and used to poison the population in order to take control of their personal property. Therefore, according to Classical Chinese Medicine, a Gu syndrome can be classified as an early example of biological warfare.
Thanks, Eric and Mark. I need to look into the history of germ theory. In the meantime, are there any microorganisms that have been proven to cause disease? For example, those found in areas with poor sanitation? If not, what is the purpose of the immune system? Thanks!
If you are interested in learning more about me:
www.middleworldalliance.org
www.shamanicsoulhealing.com
I'm currently living in Mexico since 2021. I practiced Classical Chinese Medicine and acupuncture in the Hudson Valley for over 20 years. I might also add that I did not close my practice at anytime in 2020 and effectively treated patients within the paradigm of Classical Chinese medicine. I'm still heartbroken that my colleagues abandoned their patients and medicine so easily and and fell lockstep with the "official reality." They ignored and discarded 3,000 years of wisdom and data points that clearly indicated otherwise.
Eric, I've been a big fan since you began at The Chronogram and follow PWFM shows regularly. I deeply appreciate your work.
I think ancient wisdom is relevant to modern disease and the strange times we are living in. I think your listeners might benefit from hearing my perspective as we collectively question and wrestle with the dominant medical paradigm and their applied philosophies.
If you'd like, we can have a phone conversation.
Heidi Pilar Harding, M.S., L.Ac.
ALL medicine is applied philosophy. What we are experiencing now is the breakdown of the story we call, biomedicine. We desperately need authentic paradigms to describe the very REAL physical, emotional, and spiritual suffering of our times. Eric's discussion with Dr. Baily scratches the surface of the fraudulent philosophy and dominant paradigm of western medicine, but it fails to acknowledge the genuine suffering and true origins of suffering for what the story makers have branded, and marketed to us as covid and the covid injections. Perhaps it will take a medical anthropologist to accurately report the whole story in a way that makes sense to people's very real suffering.
Good Stuff!
And you, Eric, already do understand why there is the need to see a virus.
https://open.substack.com/pub/rogiervanvlissingen/p/normalizing-normal?r=8tut8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Thanks for being curious. The sinology does not specify.
Classical Chinese Medicine is its own complete system of medicine. It is not allopathic medicine as you stated. It has its own worldview, art of diagnosis and treatment methods.
Great interview, thank you Eric. Yes, I recall Drosten (in his paper) stated this "new" disease resembled SARS based on social media posts. And this is why they constructed the primers (based on SARS) without having isolated the virus. lol
Great interview...what about that PREP drug...where people are told to take this drug BEFORE they hook up with a sexual partner so they don't get AIDs. Think about all the harm that's being done with these new drugs. I understand that AZT's toxicity has been decreased so that people can live longer taking the drug, thinking they need to take it all their lives to keep the virus from becoming full blown AIDS, but they are still told that AIDS will eventually kill them and eventually the AZT cocktail will do just that and the death will be blamed on AIDs. Looking forward to your 40th anniversary AIDs program, Eric.