Country Squire magazine goes after "the usual suspects" — its list of alleged virus deniers. What's going on inside this controversy you may not have heard about? Planet Waves FM reports.
Loved reading this Eric, just brilliant. Thank you for your voice of clarity and for presenting this in the most engaging and amusing tone. Perfect images too! I wish we could say that one day we will laugh at this.
The technology involved is complex, but the principles are simple. So my intent is to keep rewriting this same story over and over until I get it right; till it's comprehensible and accessible.
We havent yet reached the state of the endless hounding of Dr Wilhelm Reich, the burning of all his research material (books), and his incarceration...It's scary to think that's where we are headed...
I'm less than halfway through James DeMeo's 'The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space (Correcting a Major Error of Modern Science)...The author does a good job of explaining Maxwell's experiments...Dr Reich's idea about Cosmic Superimposition is taken up in the second half of the book...No need for you to explain, though an intelligent critique will be considered...
Have you ever heard of Miles Mathis? He's internet-famous for claiming math & science is all wrong, just another govt psyop to fool the masses.
I'm in no place to weigh in on the debate-- theoritcal math/physics makes my head spin.
But you might find his articles interesting. Perhaps you might even agree with him.
Fair warning - MM has a dedicated fanbase & equally dedicated group of online critics. He has been accused of being a fake persona, or a group of govt agents, running a personal blog as controlled opposition. I have never heard of anyone meeting MM in real life, although he insists he is real & beholden to no one but himself.
Considering your fastidious journalistic standards, I recommend this book to you (“Dr. Mary’s Monkey” by Edward T. Haslam) - if you haven’t already read it. The researcher (Edward T. Haslam) links the “virus question” all the way up to the mob, Lee Harvey Oswald, university medical research, and the JFK White House. Haslam also has a few YouTube presentations if you’d rather watch.
Good for you, Diana! Back even the early sixties they were weaponizing viruses. And there are so many female heroes on the Right Side of that story that I think a case could be made that to deny virus's existence is misogynistic.
According to my online friend "SaintNick", virology is heavily funded and fraught with dual use research - ostensibly to cure cancer but in reality to give Russians crippling arthritis, to use a recent Ukrainian example. Even way back in 1964 Jacob Rubenstein died in prison after a one month battle with a rare cancer after shooting Lee Harvey Oswald on live TV. Maybe a coincidence?
As one who's been following the work of Stefan Lanka for 20 years, this small but growing 'awakening' to the con of virology is beautiful, and probably wouldn't be happening if not for the new covid tyranny.
And the fiery debate in the comments is just as interesting. I know of no other issue more relevant to the truth about virology than truth about the Holocaust. Both have a narrative that's at the pinnacle of sacred to the ruling class; a narrative that cannot be questioned, and even all inquiry is banned. Simply asking questions publicly gets one shunned globally, on either issue. I learned a long time ago that only big, destructive secrets generate that kind of forced silence.
It's amazing to see you 'seeing the light' on one of these issues, while at the same time shut down and aggressively defending the establishment narrative on the other.
Regarding 'viruses', people blindly invested in the establishment narrative have a favorite deceptive trick to dismiss someone questioning the science of virology. They say something like "He thinks nobody died, and we're all imagining lots of people were sick... He's a 'denier', and he's gonna get people killed..." When that deceptive dismissal was suddenly employed everywhere in 2020 to squash dissent about 'covid', led by the media, those of us who are truth-seekers instantly recognized it. It's the 'Holocaust' strategy. And it's a huge red flag revealing that the narrative being protected is a big lie.
Do you realize that you're employing that same deceptive trick against those questioning the Holocaust narrative in the same way we're questioning virology? If someone says they don't believe the establishment narrative about WWII, and what happened in WWII Germany is very different, how do you twist that to mean they're saying 'no Jews died' or they're 'denying the Holocaust'? Wouldn't it require a very long, involved, and open-minded debate to find out the details of the disagreement?
And if I was a Jew, and wanted people to really know what happened under Hitler's rule, why would I not be encouraging anyone and everyone to question and debate the history, and dig deep, knowing that the more that's done, the more people will find the truth?
But you're saying the opposite.
And I too have been banned and censored all over social media, not for questioning the Holocaust, but simply for pointing out this blatant, indefensible hypocrisy, and for trying to shed light on the virology con.
This is just a ridiculously excellent article. Thanks so much for your amazing work, Eric. I'd love to interview you for my podcast at some point ... https://www.bitchute.com/channel/0E4xE82ZTGHW/
One is free to make friends with flower faeries, to hang out with them, give them food, take hikes, channel their poems, sketch them and write books about them. But one is not free to shut down the whole world on any premise related to their experience.
and when I checked in with the forest faeries in April 2020, I was told without hesitation that there was no pandemic whatsoever. I asked twice; I was told no twice. Three times would have been to argue and consume my goodwill with these helpful entities.
This will be terse, and the last time I bother Eric.
So, what's really going on? Why all these controversies? And why can't we have the "good old days" controversies like a guy who discovered a self-propelling engine, or cars that run on water, or cold fusion? And what the heck is up with Flat Earth? Why is that such a thing?
I think two keys:
1) FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt, throw in paranoia and distrust of everybody)
2) War Pigs (weapons manufacturers, global dominators, empire builders)
Every time a glib philosophical speculator arises, another weapon system goes away. (Or, a segment of the population loses the intellectual capability of opposing that weapon system.)
1) Flat Earth is massively signal boosted since around 2015. I've never met one IRL, but a friend's daughter is in that cult, and I know it plagues fundamentalist Christians. If you believe in flat earth, we're in a semi-two dimensional reality, and there's no space. No space means no satellites. No satellites means no guided missile systems, no ICBMS. All those space photos are scams. GPS is a scam.
2) Viruses don't exist. The United States didn't really drop virus infected insects into North Korea and China, killing thousands. The United States wasn't really running 40 bioweapons labs in Ukraine, killing dozens of neighbors. Similar Kazakhistan. Similar Norton Downs. Similar Fort Dietrich. All a scam. Figment of your imagination. Because viruses aren't real.
3) Germs can't kill you. Those guys who sniffed anthrax dust after 911 - just figment of their imagination. It's all 5G and air pollution.
4) Moon landings were fake. Werner Von Braun wasn't a genius, and the "Right Stuff" boys were in reality incompetent and liars. (and thus space tech isn't real and the Russians really don't have a set of mach 5 missiles that can reach anywhere in Europe in minutes and the US in (I think) 30 minutes. Just an anime cartoon. Nothing to worry about. All CGI.
5) Nuclear weapons aren't real. The great powers just used dynamite and a lot of press manipulation. It's fake.
6) Math and physics are fake. Got this from one of your commenters. I'll look into that later, but I think it really goes with my points.
What are my points?
1) There are heavily funded entities highly invested in making you crazy and stupid (see Daniel Estulin)
2) The Bad Guys really, really don't want your input on their evil tools.
3) The Bad Guys love it when you engage in interminable bullshit arguments on arcane technical points.
Yeah the "flat earth" thing is perplexing -- especially as I spend many hours a day doing a kind of astronomy and I not only know but feel the mechanics of it all. This is a response to a recent query. I bury the lead: "flat earth" means UNGROUNDED and that is an effect of digital technology — which McLuhan in the early 1970s compared to LSD. It induces a fantasy world. It's all a head trip. And anyone who is on this track please believe me when I say that the Earth would not feel so stable to stand on and build on were it a "flat" object. It would be gyrating wildly and have the gravity of the Moon. You would not feel safe here, understanding that many do not for other reasons.
Here's my reply to the reader —
Dear ____________:
Thanks for your letter. I was hoping this would come up.
Well, speaking personally, I live on a globe among many globes in a solar system in a galaxy at the back edge of Laniakea (the galactic superstructure). It’s a long way to Perseus-Pisces!
I can feel all of that; I have seen it in visions; I can sense it almost as palpably as my local neighborhood. As an astrologer, I live and breathe the movements of the solar system and as Carole said, “I feel the Earth move under my feet.”
What I propose is that “flat earth” was one thing in 1400 and it’s quite another thing in 2022 when many many people have yachts and airplanes and navigation skills. You don’t need Queen Isabella to sponsor your trip. You can circumnavigate in a decent trimaran with good skills. However, this was going on 5,000 years ago.
You reference only part of Team No Virus. It includes many other people who are in daily contact, who are likely to stick to the data.
I am aware of the issue you describe. I don’t go there with them yet, though the other day, I had a great call with Capt. Zeck and I described the mechanics of Mars retrograde to him; no dispute.
I think “flat earth” is trendy for a few reasons, among them the false, but to some, refreshing notion that every iota of science is a scam. It has a rebel without a clue feeling to it, but these people do have a clue.
There is so much data demonstrating the existence Earth as a globe — time zones, seasons, precessional movement, retrograde planets, measurement of shadows at the same time at different latitudes, length of day at different latitudes, eclipses, nearly simultaneous moonset at sunrise around the time of the Full Moon, occultations, sidereal navigation, and on and on and on. Our whole planet behaves like a sphere.
When you sit on the shore of the Mediterranean and watch planets rise (right on schedule, even timed with the most rudimentary astrology software), you know what is happening. But you have to pay attention and observe and be with nature.
Jeez, if you meekly understand the ISS orbital schedule, you know what’s going on.
So to my ear, this discussion is a pastime, in the words of Dr. Eric Byrne. A pastime is when the participants talk about something but engage in no action concerning it.
And: flat earth is like coming out as gay to your mother. There! I said it! Aren’t you shocked? I bet you never knew!
Finally, my sense is that “flat earth" is a symptom above all else of the ungrounded digital age. They are in a sense pretending Gaia does not have (most of) her body. It’s like someone saying, “Hello, I am a pair of flip-flops."
They are saying per se that most of the ground, the terra firma, beneath them is gone.
The digital age is physically and intellectually groundless and this is why it feels good to them; why it comes as a relief.
On a calmer day, I will invite them onto my program to tell us about their incredible discovery, and we will all have a good laugh.
Eric, aside from Vero (monkey kidney) cells, epithelial cells have commonly been used to reproduce sars cov2 in the process of isolation. Unlike the scamsters you mentioned (Poornima Wagh being the latest manifestation, and thank you very much for dispensing with her), Yeadon is not a loon, and his crafted language can be read multiple ways. So let's search to see if there is some specificity among epithelial cells that he's referring to in your quotes of him:
There are boatloads of articles where they used those specific HNBE cells to culture the virus. And that was my very first search. So unless I'm totally in left field or grossly misunderstanding something, Yeadon committed a howler. So I suspect there's a misquote somewhere.
I highly recommended your article on Poornima Wagh to Dr Kevin McCairn. He has done the yeoman's work in dealing with the scamsters you mentioned and others you didn't mention. Why anyone would imagine there is a self replicating internet router made out of graphene oxide that starts up when you get a vax and then communicates over 5g is beyond me, but that is only one of the scamster "theories" out there.
I've spent 2-1/2 years proving journalistically that SARS-CoV-2 has never once been shown to exist, as have several of my colleagues. What's her name was threatening that good work.
As for graphene oxide, it seems to be in a lot of "Pharma" -- advertised on the box as being in some "masks," etc.
"I've proved over the past year" yada yada. I read all his published work covering about 6 months trying to find his ground zero for "viruses don't exist", and while he worked with actual PhD virologists, there was nary a peep out of him in the 6 month review I did, and I gave up as he's just a blow hard, and I think a sad-sack imitation of Yoichi Shimatsu, who's a much harder hitting journalist. The Kundalini Kid believes viruses don't exist, but that a spiritual snake lives at the base of your spine and can be released to product creativity.
Graphene Oxide is a well-known adjuvant (probably safer than aluminum), but to miss the point that the loons say it turns into a nano-bot is utterly disingenuous.
Who are you going to believe, Dear Reader? "viruses don't exist" Coppolino, or your lying eyes that can see a scanning electron microscopy picture of sars cov2?
Please, please Dear Reader - filter out everybody who is connected to Alex Jones and Stew Peters. Or Sun Myung Moon. Or the Falun Gong (CIA).
If you go to your HR department and apply for a vaccine exemption on the grounds that viruses don't exist, per Stefan Lanka, what is going to happen to you? What will happen to your kids?
Filter out glib bullshitters who talk all "sciencey" but are in reality nothing but Guido on the boardwalk, playing the old shell game on you.
The words I say and write are preserved. So go ahead and find me saying "viruses don't exist." And as for your electron micrograph photos, there is no way to show that they are the thing they say they are — the specific thing. Also, while you're busy trolling my Substack, have you ever actually written an article about any of this? Something with a byline, even so little as a blog post? Not playing off of or reacting to someone else, but an original thought from your original mind. If so, I would like to see it.
Thanks Todd. While these are not reasoned out with a full story arc, attribution and a multiple-sides-to-the-story approach, I believe that you are dedicated to the issue.
I will ask you the same question I ask the top experts when I can — would you please comment on why they must be gene-aligned using metagenomic transcription, and why there are only in silico sequences? If they are finding "real virus" using in silico primers, why don't they take the "real virus" they find and use that for the primers, and then find more real virus?
If they have 6.4 million+ claimed to be dead from SARS-CoV-2, why do all 208 governments and institutions surveyed say they have no sample from a living host, and why is there no certified reference material (CRM) available for this claimed pathogen?
Quick scan verdict, even with my adversarial attitude: there's a helluva lot of good stuff in there; thanks for the response. For example, nobody knows that stuff about the Spanish Flu. I'll have to take some time on it. Looks to be a small book. If one read all the links, maybe a World Book Encyclopedia.
It's 185 pages and it only goes through end 2020. We have built out most of 2021 though it requires a total rewrite; living through 2020 a dozen times was quite enough. what I have there is definitely the outline of a book, or the reference material; here is how it looks when set to narrative.
This is very good. Of course there should be experiments to determine what is true.
There is one aspect of the covid virus existence controversy that I haven’t seen discussed, and that is the spike protein that supposedly makes the virus more dangerous. Is its existence being disputed? What about the mRNA vaccines turning the human body into a “spike protein factory”?
Sorry if this is a stupid question—I’m not a scientist.
I hope you realize that my original comment was on the article itself, not on the lengthy discussion that precedes its placement. Much of what you say makes no sense to me, and I’m not interested anyway.
I have a spent a lifetime studying the Holocaust, and visiting the ruins at multiple locations. So I have personal reportage. I am not basing my theory on what I read in a book.
Michael, please write a book and send me a copy. Don't try to prove or even assert your theory in a comment to a blog about the current Holocaust.
Because just like the majority of people today say it's not happening, the majority in the 1930s and the 1940s believed it was not happening, and were in all kinds of denial. That is the parallel.
To your question, I have seen the crematoria, the massive ash pits, the execution firing ranges, the strangling cellar, the allied footage, the smashed synagogue in Erfurt, the prison and torture yard in Ilvers Gehoffen, the capital court inside the Citadel in Erfurt, the mug shots, and much other physical evidence; along with hearing the testimony of survivors and their children. We will leave it there.
I will repeat, however, that I have zero tolerance for assertions that something did not happen in that era, and any generalized or categorical statements about Jewish people.
To all reading, I suggest you check out the documentary Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.
If you keep getting banned, maybe you need to become more conversant. I am an editor, not an anarchist. But I am genuinely open minded, though I do not play fast and loose with the truth or anything except maybe my guitar; where I could be a little faster and a little looser.
While I am open to discussion of the Holocaust and WWII history, everyone must be advised that I will ban people who state that the Holocaust did not happen, or who even come near anti-Semitism.
Not the same thing, kid. When you say the Holocaust did not happen, you are coming from an aggressive agenda that is demonstrably incorrect. I am of the "it's not about 12 million people, it's about one person" school of thought.
You are free to make factual assertions. You are free to ask questions. I have plenty. But on that topic, I am not accepting categorical statements. And I am not making any such statements where virology or viruses are concerned. If you see one, let's talk about it.
Here is my editorial policy. We all abide by it when I am at the helm. Being called a bullshit peddler means you are accusing me of professional malpractice. If you want to be in the conversation, then do not.
Loved reading this Eric, just brilliant. Thank you for your voice of clarity and for presenting this in the most engaging and amusing tone. Perfect images too! I wish we could say that one day we will laugh at this.
The technology involved is complex, but the principles are simple. So my intent is to keep rewriting this same story over and over until I get it right; till it's comprehensible and accessible.
We havent yet reached the state of the endless hounding of Dr Wilhelm Reich, the burning of all his research material (books), and his incarceration...It's scary to think that's where we are headed...
I'm less than halfway through James DeMeo's 'The Dynamic Ether of Cosmic Space (Correcting a Major Error of Modern Science)...The author does a good job of explaining Maxwell's experiments...Dr Reich's idea about Cosmic Superimposition is taken up in the second half of the book...No need for you to explain, though an intelligent critique will be considered...
Have you ever heard of Miles Mathis? He's internet-famous for claiming math & science is all wrong, just another govt psyop to fool the masses.
I'm in no place to weigh in on the debate-- theoritcal math/physics makes my head spin.
But you might find his articles interesting. Perhaps you might even agree with him.
Fair warning - MM has a dedicated fanbase & equally dedicated group of online critics. He has been accused of being a fake persona, or a group of govt agents, running a personal blog as controlled opposition. I have never heard of anyone meeting MM in real life, although he insists he is real & beholden to no one but himself.
Eric,
Considering your fastidious journalistic standards, I recommend this book to you (“Dr. Mary’s Monkey” by Edward T. Haslam) - if you haven’t already read it. The researcher (Edward T. Haslam) links the “virus question” all the way up to the mob, Lee Harvey Oswald, university medical research, and the JFK White House. Haslam also has a few YouTube presentations if you’d rather watch.
https://www.amazon.com/Dr-Marys-Monkey-Cancer-Causing-Assassination-ebook/dp/B00LZ5OTQ0/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=F7WAL0LF5V3C&keywords=dr+mary%27s+monkey&qid=1660695131&sprefix=dr+mary%2Caps%2C163&sr=8-1
Love your writing! Thank you for supporting the Drs Bailey.
Diana
Talk about "coincidence." I just came upon a reference to that book yesterday, in a book on the JFK assassination.
Good for you, Diana! Back even the early sixties they were weaponizing viruses. And there are so many female heroes on the Right Side of that story that I think a case could be made that to deny virus's existence is misogynistic.
According to my online friend "SaintNick", virology is heavily funded and fraught with dual use research - ostensibly to cure cancer but in reality to give Russians crippling arthritis, to use a recent Ukrainian example. Even way back in 1964 Jacob Rubenstein died in prison after a one month battle with a rare cancer after shooting Lee Harvey Oswald on live TV. Maybe a coincidence?
Wonderfully written, Eric. Thanks for the insight.
Love the article, Eric.
As one who's been following the work of Stefan Lanka for 20 years, this small but growing 'awakening' to the con of virology is beautiful, and probably wouldn't be happening if not for the new covid tyranny.
And the fiery debate in the comments is just as interesting. I know of no other issue more relevant to the truth about virology than truth about the Holocaust. Both have a narrative that's at the pinnacle of sacred to the ruling class; a narrative that cannot be questioned, and even all inquiry is banned. Simply asking questions publicly gets one shunned globally, on either issue. I learned a long time ago that only big, destructive secrets generate that kind of forced silence.
It's amazing to see you 'seeing the light' on one of these issues, while at the same time shut down and aggressively defending the establishment narrative on the other.
Regarding 'viruses', people blindly invested in the establishment narrative have a favorite deceptive trick to dismiss someone questioning the science of virology. They say something like "He thinks nobody died, and we're all imagining lots of people were sick... He's a 'denier', and he's gonna get people killed..." When that deceptive dismissal was suddenly employed everywhere in 2020 to squash dissent about 'covid', led by the media, those of us who are truth-seekers instantly recognized it. It's the 'Holocaust' strategy. And it's a huge red flag revealing that the narrative being protected is a big lie.
Do you realize that you're employing that same deceptive trick against those questioning the Holocaust narrative in the same way we're questioning virology? If someone says they don't believe the establishment narrative about WWII, and what happened in WWII Germany is very different, how do you twist that to mean they're saying 'no Jews died' or they're 'denying the Holocaust'? Wouldn't it require a very long, involved, and open-minded debate to find out the details of the disagreement?
And if I was a Jew, and wanted people to really know what happened under Hitler's rule, why would I not be encouraging anyone and everyone to question and debate the history, and dig deep, knowing that the more that's done, the more people will find the truth?
But you're saying the opposite.
And I too have been banned and censored all over social media, not for questioning the Holocaust, but simply for pointing out this blatant, indefensible hypocrisy, and for trying to shed light on the virology con.
Terrific, Eric. Thank you.
This is just a ridiculously excellent article. Thanks so much for your amazing work, Eric. I'd love to interview you for my podcast at some point ... https://www.bitchute.com/channel/0E4xE82ZTGHW/
Hey hello Sol -- efc@chironreturn.org and copy efc@planetwaves.net please
Will do.
Talking of begonias, here is the evidence for the flower fairies https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/we-cant-find-them-therefore-they
Jo
One is free to make friends with flower faeries, to hang out with them, give them food, take hikes, channel their poems, sketch them and write books about them. But one is not free to shut down the whole world on any premise related to their experience.
Indeed 🌸
and when I checked in with the forest faeries in April 2020, I was told without hesitation that there was no pandemic whatsoever. I asked twice; I was told no twice. Three times would have been to argue and consume my goodwill with these helpful entities.
Yes, it would have seemed rude, like you didn't believe what they said. I'm glad you talk to them.
They are far more wise than most of us and keep well out of the way of the rather dimwitted people who claim to be investigating the science.
We have an old bread knife in the kitchen called Country Squire. It may be older than me. I always have to re-read...
This will be terse, and the last time I bother Eric.
So, what's really going on? Why all these controversies? And why can't we have the "good old days" controversies like a guy who discovered a self-propelling engine, or cars that run on water, or cold fusion? And what the heck is up with Flat Earth? Why is that such a thing?
I think two keys:
1) FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt, throw in paranoia and distrust of everybody)
2) War Pigs (weapons manufacturers, global dominators, empire builders)
Every time a glib philosophical speculator arises, another weapon system goes away. (Or, a segment of the population loses the intellectual capability of opposing that weapon system.)
1) Flat Earth is massively signal boosted since around 2015. I've never met one IRL, but a friend's daughter is in that cult, and I know it plagues fundamentalist Christians. If you believe in flat earth, we're in a semi-two dimensional reality, and there's no space. No space means no satellites. No satellites means no guided missile systems, no ICBMS. All those space photos are scams. GPS is a scam.
2) Viruses don't exist. The United States didn't really drop virus infected insects into North Korea and China, killing thousands. The United States wasn't really running 40 bioweapons labs in Ukraine, killing dozens of neighbors. Similar Kazakhistan. Similar Norton Downs. Similar Fort Dietrich. All a scam. Figment of your imagination. Because viruses aren't real.
3) Germs can't kill you. Those guys who sniffed anthrax dust after 911 - just figment of their imagination. It's all 5G and air pollution.
4) Moon landings were fake. Werner Von Braun wasn't a genius, and the "Right Stuff" boys were in reality incompetent and liars. (and thus space tech isn't real and the Russians really don't have a set of mach 5 missiles that can reach anywhere in Europe in minutes and the US in (I think) 30 minutes. Just an anime cartoon. Nothing to worry about. All CGI.
5) Nuclear weapons aren't real. The great powers just used dynamite and a lot of press manipulation. It's fake.
6) Math and physics are fake. Got this from one of your commenters. I'll look into that later, but I think it really goes with my points.
What are my points?
1) There are heavily funded entities highly invested in making you crazy and stupid (see Daniel Estulin)
2) The Bad Guys really, really don't want your input on their evil tools.
3) The Bad Guys love it when you engage in interminable bullshit arguments on arcane technical points.
Here is my opus on the Moon landing —
https://planetwaves.net/astrologynews/what-if-the-moon-landing-happened.html
Yeah the "flat earth" thing is perplexing -- especially as I spend many hours a day doing a kind of astronomy and I not only know but feel the mechanics of it all. This is a response to a recent query. I bury the lead: "flat earth" means UNGROUNDED and that is an effect of digital technology — which McLuhan in the early 1970s compared to LSD. It induces a fantasy world. It's all a head trip. And anyone who is on this track please believe me when I say that the Earth would not feel so stable to stand on and build on were it a "flat" object. It would be gyrating wildly and have the gravity of the Moon. You would not feel safe here, understanding that many do not for other reasons.
Here's my reply to the reader —
Dear ____________:
Thanks for your letter. I was hoping this would come up.
Well, speaking personally, I live on a globe among many globes in a solar system in a galaxy at the back edge of Laniakea (the galactic superstructure). It’s a long way to Perseus-Pisces!
I can feel all of that; I have seen it in visions; I can sense it almost as palpably as my local neighborhood. As an astrologer, I live and breathe the movements of the solar system and as Carole said, “I feel the Earth move under my feet.”
What I propose is that “flat earth” was one thing in 1400 and it’s quite another thing in 2022 when many many people have yachts and airplanes and navigation skills. You don’t need Queen Isabella to sponsor your trip. You can circumnavigate in a decent trimaran with good skills. However, this was going on 5,000 years ago.
You reference only part of Team No Virus. It includes many other people who are in daily contact, who are likely to stick to the data.
I am aware of the issue you describe. I don’t go there with them yet, though the other day, I had a great call with Capt. Zeck and I described the mechanics of Mars retrograde to him; no dispute.
I think “flat earth” is trendy for a few reasons, among them the false, but to some, refreshing notion that every iota of science is a scam. It has a rebel without a clue feeling to it, but these people do have a clue.
There is so much data demonstrating the existence Earth as a globe — time zones, seasons, precessional movement, retrograde planets, measurement of shadows at the same time at different latitudes, length of day at different latitudes, eclipses, nearly simultaneous moonset at sunrise around the time of the Full Moon, occultations, sidereal navigation, and on and on and on. Our whole planet behaves like a sphere.
When you sit on the shore of the Mediterranean and watch planets rise (right on schedule, even timed with the most rudimentary astrology software), you know what is happening. But you have to pay attention and observe and be with nature.
Jeez, if you meekly understand the ISS orbital schedule, you know what’s going on.
So to my ear, this discussion is a pastime, in the words of Dr. Eric Byrne. A pastime is when the participants talk about something but engage in no action concerning it.
And: flat earth is like coming out as gay to your mother. There! I said it! Aren’t you shocked? I bet you never knew!
Finally, my sense is that “flat earth" is a symptom above all else of the ungrounded digital age. They are in a sense pretending Gaia does not have (most of) her body. It’s like someone saying, “Hello, I am a pair of flip-flops."
They are saying per se that most of the ground, the terra firma, beneath them is gone.
The digital age is physically and intellectually groundless and this is why it feels good to them; why it comes as a relief.
On a calmer day, I will invite them onto my program to tell us about their incredible discovery, and we will all have a good laugh.
— efc
Eric, aside from Vero (monkey kidney) cells, epithelial cells have commonly been used to reproduce sars cov2 in the process of isolation. Unlike the scamsters you mentioned (Poornima Wagh being the latest manifestation, and thank you very much for dispensing with her), Yeadon is not a loon, and his crafted language can be read multiple ways. So let's search to see if there is some specificity among epithelial cells that he's referring to in your quotes of him:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C43&q=human+normal+bronchial+epithelial+cells+sars+cov2&btnG=
Nope.
There are boatloads of articles where they used those specific HNBE cells to culture the virus. And that was my very first search. So unless I'm totally in left field or grossly misunderstanding something, Yeadon committed a howler. So I suspect there's a misquote somewhere.
I think viruses are isolated in high schools around the world: https://sophiasnippets.wordpress.com/2021/08/28/how-to-isolate-viruses/
This is not rocket science.
I highly recommended your article on Poornima Wagh to Dr Kevin McCairn. He has done the yeoman's work in dealing with the scamsters you mentioned and others you didn't mention. Why anyone would imagine there is a self replicating internet router made out of graphene oxide that starts up when you get a vax and then communicates over 5g is beyond me, but that is only one of the scamster "theories" out there.
I am sure Kevin would love to talk to you.
I've spent 2-1/2 years proving journalistically that SARS-CoV-2 has never once been shown to exist, as have several of my colleagues. What's her name was threatening that good work.
As for graphene oxide, it seems to be in a lot of "Pharma" -- advertised on the box as being in some "masks," etc.
That's some Rappaport-level dismissiveness.
"I've proved over the past year" yada yada. I read all his published work covering about 6 months trying to find his ground zero for "viruses don't exist", and while he worked with actual PhD virologists, there was nary a peep out of him in the 6 month review I did, and I gave up as he's just a blow hard, and I think a sad-sack imitation of Yoichi Shimatsu, who's a much harder hitting journalist. The Kundalini Kid believes viruses don't exist, but that a spiritual snake lives at the base of your spine and can be released to product creativity.
Graphene Oxide is a well-known adjuvant (probably safer than aluminum), but to miss the point that the loons say it turns into a nano-bot is utterly disingenuous.
Who are you going to believe, Dear Reader? "viruses don't exist" Coppolino, or your lying eyes that can see a scanning electron microscopy picture of sars cov2?
Please, please Dear Reader - filter out everybody who is connected to Alex Jones and Stew Peters. Or Sun Myung Moon. Or the Falun Gong (CIA).
If you go to your HR department and apply for a vaccine exemption on the grounds that viruses don't exist, per Stefan Lanka, what is going to happen to you? What will happen to your kids?
Filter out glib bullshitters who talk all "sciencey" but are in reality nothing but Guido on the boardwalk, playing the old shell game on you.
The words I say and write are preserved. So go ahead and find me saying "viruses don't exist." And as for your electron micrograph photos, there is no way to show that they are the thing they say they are — the specific thing. Also, while you're busy trolling my Substack, have you ever actually written an article about any of this? Something with a byline, even so little as a blog post? Not playing off of or reacting to someone else, but an original thought from your original mind. If so, I would like to see it.
For subject matter: https://sophiasnippets.wordpress.com/in-memorial-they-bled-out-their-vaginas-and-they-died/
This is somewhat original, but in retrospect it may be that "standard of proof" may more accurately be said to be contextual than subjective: https://sophiasnippets.wordpress.com/2022/01/29/if-proofs-are-subjective-do-viruses-exist/
Thanks Todd. While these are not reasoned out with a full story arc, attribution and a multiple-sides-to-the-story approach, I believe that you are dedicated to the issue.
I will ask you the same question I ask the top experts when I can — would you please comment on why they must be gene-aligned using metagenomic transcription, and why there are only in silico sequences? If they are finding "real virus" using in silico primers, why don't they take the "real virus" they find and use that for the primers, and then find more real virus?
If they have 6.4 million+ claimed to be dead from SARS-CoV-2, why do all 208 governments and institutions surveyed say they have no sample from a living host, and why is there no certified reference material (CRM) available for this claimed pathogen?
So you're glibly dismissing my statement as glib dismissiveness?
Here, have this, Black Knight — I know it's just a flesh wound
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/covid-chronology-5.1.3.pdf
Quick scan verdict, even with my adversarial attitude: there's a helluva lot of good stuff in there; thanks for the response. For example, nobody knows that stuff about the Spanish Flu. I'll have to take some time on it. Looks to be a small book. If one read all the links, maybe a World Book Encyclopedia.
It's 185 pages and it only goes through end 2020. We have built out most of 2021 though it requires a total rewrite; living through 2020 a dozen times was quite enough. what I have there is definitely the outline of a book, or the reference material; here is how it looks when set to narrative.
https://audio.pwfm.tech/dlb11.4.pdf
This is very good. Of course there should be experiments to determine what is true.
There is one aspect of the covid virus existence controversy that I haven’t seen discussed, and that is the spike protein that supposedly makes the virus more dangerous. Is its existence being disputed? What about the mRNA vaccines turning the human body into a “spike protein factory”?
Sorry if this is a stupid question—I’m not a scientist.
You can know that experimentation is the essence of the scientific method without being a scientist.
I hope you realize that my original comment was on the article itself, not on the lengthy discussion that precedes its placement. Much of what you say makes no sense to me, and I’m not interested anyway.
What a load of utter bollocks.
Do tell.
I have a spent a lifetime studying the Holocaust, and visiting the ruins at multiple locations. So I have personal reportage. I am not basing my theory on what I read in a book.
Michael, please write a book and send me a copy. Don't try to prove or even assert your theory in a comment to a blog about the current Holocaust.
Because just like the majority of people today say it's not happening, the majority in the 1930s and the 1940s believed it was not happening, and were in all kinds of denial. That is the parallel.
To your question, I have seen the crematoria, the massive ash pits, the execution firing ranges, the strangling cellar, the allied footage, the smashed synagogue in Erfurt, the prison and torture yard in Ilvers Gehoffen, the capital court inside the Citadel in Erfurt, the mug shots, and much other physical evidence; along with hearing the testimony of survivors and their children. We will leave it there.
I will repeat, however, that I have zero tolerance for assertions that something did not happen in that era, and any generalized or categorical statements about Jewish people.
To all reading, I suggest you check out the documentary Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.
https://www.planetwaves.net/contents/auschwitz_photo_series.html
If you keep getting banned, maybe you need to become more conversant. I am an editor, not an anarchist. But I am genuinely open minded, though I do not play fast and loose with the truth or anything except maybe my guitar; where I could be a little faster and a little looser.
While I am open to discussion of the Holocaust and WWII history, everyone must be advised that I will ban people who state that the Holocaust did not happen, or who even come near anti-Semitism.
Not the same thing, kid. When you say the Holocaust did not happen, you are coming from an aggressive agenda that is demonstrably incorrect. I am of the "it's not about 12 million people, it's about one person" school of thought.
You are free to make factual assertions. You are free to ask questions. I have plenty. But on that topic, I am not accepting categorical statements. And I am not making any such statements where virology or viruses are concerned. If you see one, let's talk about it.
Here is my editorial policy. We all abide by it when I am at the helm. Being called a bullshit peddler means you are accusing me of professional malpractice. If you want to be in the conversation, then do not.
https://planetwaves.net/terms-of-service-and-editorial-policy/