Today I have the second amazing installment of virus huggers making their case, from Joe Mercola to Catherine Austin Fitts; Del Bigtree to Sasha Latypova. It's a star-studded night!
Hey all, thank you for another round of fantastic virus hugger audio! Please keep a lookout, and style points the funnier they are. This is applying actual journalistic pressure; the "gotcha" of it all is how they all pretty much admit they understand the issue but are avoiding it for business or political purposes. That is not a good look. Let's shine some of that Equinox Sun on them -- it's the best disinfectant.
for a hilarious demolition of the "Free Market" start at about 19 minutes...I am so grateful to have worked with The Yes Men in the era of this film, participating in one prank (The New York Post) and doing the Q&A after the film for its run at Time&Space in Hudson. At 19 mins you meet Gilda the Golden Skeleton in the Closet...which flows into Milton Friedman and his followers...these guys emboldened me...Igor, Jacques -- je t'adore.
Your connection of SSRI use to sexual repression and as a result the “gender dysphoria” epidemic answered questions I’ve been wrestling with for years.
As you may know, I’ve been active in various poly, tantra, swing and other scenes as a presenter since the 1990s, and the result of all of this has been impossible to parse out until now.
Previously I explained it with digital consciousness (which is about amputation, and the conversion of sex into the digital environment) and overload of gender chemicals (“forever chemicals”) but your idea goes right to the core of the emotional chaos involved. Certainly digital exposure and xenoestrogenic chemicals are not helping matters.
Also, I am an adept at expanding your theories, and my connection of this to the sense of panic around ordinary heterosexual attraction completes the idea — and explains why people who are wholesome, respectful and open/conversant can be considered predators.
Those “woke” zombies must be pretty angry under all that altered chemistry, delusion and suppressed feeling. I believe that SSRIs do nearly permanent damage, so if 20% are using today, cycle that same percentage through all the past users.
I wonder how many haven’t experienced a good orgasm or bowel movement in 10 years…
Because I have experienced it myself numerous times, I can tell you Dr. Mercola is talking about censorship. In recent years, on those occasions when Dr, Mercola talked about viruses, I've offered a counter discussion. I'm always civil and I never resort to ad hominem attacks, nor do I use foul language. I'm censored merely for presenting evidence about the unresolved virus issue. The last time was just over a week ago when I had several comments taken down.
This is rich coming from a man who has spent a lot of word capitol on his site whining about being censored by The Center for Countering Digital Hate for being part of the Misinformation Dozen.
I'll be posting tomorrow about my experience with CHD on this topic.
Half way through, managed to get around temporary problems with the recording around the first music break. No surprise, SUPERB!
Something struck me about a common point shared by all four of the presenter teams, in spite of certain apparent differences. Mercola and Humphries were down on the idea of "virus denial" ostensibly because viruses are real. He didn't say the question is unimportant.
Del Bigtree was down on that idea because it threatens to get in the way of his allegedly imminent success regarding the bringing Fauci and the other culpable people to justice. He deemed the question a barrier to this.
Latypova/Ruby, and Fitts/Broze both focused on how the virus question was unimportant and a total diversion from the real work, fighting repressive measures.
What all four teams are actually doing is brand protection, and doing so in different ways because they have different brands. Mercola is heavily invested in "alternative treatments." What's the point of "treatments" if the viruses which require them can't be shown to exist? Not good for sales.
Bigtree's big thing is ICAN, which pursues legal measures and remedies. His focus is on legal actions against and punishment of the perpetrators. And don't you dare ruin his case.
And Laypova/Ruby and Fitts/Broze are about "exposing and fighting fraud." It doesn't really matter to them what the causes of the events are, they just wanna win points for uncovering "wrong-doing." Astounding how they can deem the matter of whether the entity whose alleged existence and pathogenic nature were used to shut down the world actually even exists to be unimportant.
I still wonder why some of us were skeptical to one degree or another from the beginning of 2020 and to this day many others believe the narrative lock stock and barrel. I began questioning HIV/AIDS 20 years ago when I stumbled into the work of the Perth Group and when I saw Fauci popping up like a bobble head in 2020 I sensed that something wasn't right. The lockdowns and other extreme measures seemed so off to me. I remember driving buy a Trader Joe's grocery store and people were lined up around the corner in masks, standing feet apart from one another as if it was just the normal thing to do. Then the guy who went biking past me all by himself along a sidewalk without anyone else, WEARING A MASK, that I new group insanity was truly upon us. When I mentioned that on Facebook, I was stunned when a couple people defended the masked-biker dude, saying he was just preventing virus from spreading in the air. Then my brother asked me where all the ventilators were going to come from when people were dying in the streets (which never happened). Several friends and family members pushed me to get the vax (which I never did), and one of them who advertised on FB each booster he got, ended up in the hospital for a week with 'covid'. I'm the dude who masked the least amount possible, was in coffee shops, going to the gym, didn't get vaxxed, and being in public when possible, and never had 'covid' to this day.
I heard an exchange between Catherine Austin Fitts and Tom Cowan from earlier than a year ago, I believe, but I don't know exactly when. It was linked on her Solari Report website. And in that clip she admitted to Tom that she knew viruses did not exist, but she wouldn't say it because, she claimed, she couldn't explain the science of it to her Tennessee neighbors. That was when I decided to stop subscribing to her website. It was so clearly a bald-faced lie--she is brilliant, there's no way she couldn't find ways to explain it to anyone. And it was a rather condescending insult to Tennesseans! Does she really think that little of her neighbors' ability to think and understand? I wonder if this is the interview she mentions in the clip with Derrick Broze.
The Mercola-Humphries discussion is a real piece of work. I discuss it in my latest Substack post, Newsletter, 3/1/24. Outright pushing censorship of people like us while speaking of several alleged viruses as if they are undeniable facts, entities proven to exist via the scientific method rather than computer files.
It would be good journalistic practice to ask whether renowned low carb high fat 'nutritionist' Tim Noakes (who wrote the preface) or the Baileys receive any funding from Tom Cowan's Weston A. Price Foundation or other such animal ag industry funded front groups. The Bailey's video on bugs that I was initially blocked from was heavily biased in its favour. I know that Joe Rogan is funded by the meat industry and is also very skewed.
I think that the opposite of the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect ('you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story (you know about), and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate') is happening. We read what we agree with, maybe it crystallises what we subconsciously suspected, about 'viruses' and health for example, we research ourselves and everything checks out. We feel part of a wider group. We then turn the page and because we now like, trust and feel allied with the authors we don't do the same critical analysis. Or maybe we do know better but keep quiet, like Dawn Lester and David Parker so as not to be dumped out of the group and lose our followers.
Here's the Ruby/Latypova interview, Eric. Having listened to the whole thing, I think it's fair enough to say that Ruby is equivacatory -- "I'd prefer to keep an open mind," she says at one point. But Latypova's position is so diametrically opposite to the words you put into her mouth that I think you have an ethical responsibility to issue a retraction/correction. Hell, she even says that she loves the work of Cowan/Kaufman/Baileys, and that it has informed her own thinking.
And I hope that you will interview her. I'd of course heard her name before, but didn't know anything about her. Judging by this conversation, she's definitely got it going on both intellectually and morally.
To my ears, you completely misunderstood the Ruby/Latypova exchange, Eric. Ruby said that there SHOULD be scientific debate. Latypova agreed, then allowed that it would have been reasonable to take some countermeasures, whatever the cause of a large health event were, IF it had been shewn "WITHOUT FAKING IT, AND WITHOUT MURDERING PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL" that such an event were actually taking place.
And with Austin-Fitts, it sounded to me like she was saying that to HER it didn't matter what the pretext was for the launching of full-on 1984, because the point is that they were DOING it. And, by implication, if/when the pretext is acknowledged to be bogus, they'll simply memory-hole that pretext, push out a different one, and continue to implement the "New Normal". But she didn't say (at least not in the clip you played) that OTHER people shouldn't be making a stink about the no-virus issue; just that for her it wasn't a priority.
Maybe I'm nuts -- but that's what I heard in those two clips. I personally think they're both valid points. (Obviously, Mercola and Humphries are insane.)
Listened to the second half. Actually, i already heard Eric with Dr Mark Bailey a couple of days ago and commented on that on that segment's own page, posted a couple of days ago. SOLID GOLD. And really good segment about Prozac and gender dysphoria. Reminds me of numerous animals which underwent sex changes due to environmental pollution, particularly water-borne life. GRRR!
Here is my comment about the Mark Bailey interview segment.
Jeffrey Strahl
Lockdown Times
Feb 28
·edited Feb 28
My comments. PHENOMENAL interview. Some key points were covered. The alleged virus genome is an “in silico” entity. It is nothing but a computer file filled with code, assembled out of short strands of code corresponding to short strands of nucleic acid found in a cell culture experiment. The strands are the results of mixing extracts from humans with tissue, most commonly green monkey kidney cells. antibiotics (poisonous to kidney cells), and nutrients. This stew is allowed to brew, and is then mixed, including the cutting up of all nucleic acid segments into ones shorter than around 5-600 base pairs, translating into code, and loading into a computer program or two or more, and using software to do the assembly.
There is a deliberate attempt to call this “sequencing,” making it seem just like taking DNA from known organisms and breaking it down into ordered chains of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine (A, C, G, T), the four basic genetic nucleic acids (RNA has uracil instead of thymine, and any which is in the mix is changed via an additive into thymine). Something made via assembling pieces whose origin is never established (unknown provenance), an entity which exists only in a computer and has never been shown to actually exist in nature, let alone shown to be pathogenic, is being presented as a real existing physical organism.
In fact, this computer-only entity is used as the basis for designing tests like the PCR which then are said to determine whether someone has ‘COVID” (or indeed anything else). This is done by providing the test with short segments of code which are alleged to come from this compute-only alleged entity. This has been a testing pandemic. And there is a history of creating stories about viruses and alleging that they account for sicknesses which are actually the result of toxic chemicals degrading our environment.
Regarding Betty Dotson and cannabis lowering sexual inhibitions. First time i ever got high on cannabis was also my first time experiencing free love (with the woman who turned me on). I had experienced commercial sex before, but this was of course very different. Coincidentally, the first woman i had intercourse with under commercial circumstances, in fact my first three times, offered me some cannabis our second time, i wasn't ready.
And people go along out of fear. And/or because they are invested in the idea that “i got sick with “COVID,” family members got it, friends got it….,” or because that’s what a celebrity they trust in says is true, or because they don’t trust their own understanding of physical reality at all (especially in regarding to health) and believe “experts,”…. For example, I had the experience of a decades-long friend attack me for being out of touch with modern science and not understanding that “experts” don’t need to do physical explorations, they can just use computers, and that all my friends who say otherwise (including the ones with solid science credentials) know nothing (he himself has never finished community college!). He is in charge of five (!) Facebook groups.
I sure hope that this video and the book which Doctors Mark and Sam Bailey have released can help widen true understanding and push back the night of know nothingness. Cockroaches scurry off once the lights are turned on.
Harking back to 2020 and the first few days of lock-down I could not help but wonder then how the virus spread so quickly from Wuhan to Las Vegas. Was someone from Vegas in Wuhan and at that market? I had been using the I Ching for over fifty years for guidance in my passage. And I used it as a tool to make ideal passage through my life and as an instrument to determine right action. It had never let me down provided I followed its counsel. So three days into the lock-down I asked the I Ching this question: Given this pandemic what ought I to be doing about it? I knew if I followed its counsel rather than CNN’s counsel I would be right with what is going on. I received in reply Hexagram 35, Progress, the third line moving. Hexagram 35 is one of the most favorable in the book and pictures the sun rising rapidly over the earth. A bright image. The moving line, likewise one of the most favorable in the book, reads “All are in accord. Remorse disappears.” Hmmmm. Such a glowing oracle for supposedly a dismal situation in the external world. Why hadn't I received something like hexagram 29, Danger? Or hex. 47, Exhaustion? Or hex. 39, Obstruction? Or this line from hexagram 63: "The finest clothes turn to rags. Be careful all day long" Or any of the many other hexagrams and lines which would warn of dire circumstances or counsel one to caution? I quit listening to CNN or any other mainstream media broadcasts and started listening to myself and looking at actual conditions in my neighborhood and environs. Nothing had changed much, but for the fact that there were masks abounding and public places were closing, but I didn’t see lines of emergency vehicles nor hearses. I am retired so I did not lose a full-time job or anything like that. So I lived joyfully day to day as though nothing dangerous were going on. My partner and I went on one of the loveliest vacations that summer. We went to Mesa Verde National park, home of the cliff dwellings. If restaurants required masks we donned them, ate, and then took them off. We did not wipe down the hotel rooms we stayed in those four days. Because people were afraid to travel there were very, very few tourists in the Park which enhanced our enjoyment of it and enabled us to get cut-rate lodgings inside the park. Thank you lock-down! I had been following Eric’s astrological talks on YouTube for several years. Now I listened intently as he exposed the faux-demic and increased my confidence in my original doubts. I never got the vaccine nor have I ever received a flu shot. Last time I had the flu was 1987. I try to live healthfully, take my supplements and exercise. Btw I had been hospitalized twice in 2020 for non-respiratory related reasons and never saw piles of bodies in the corridors nor hearses lined up at the hospital. I tested negative both times for covid. But then I knew I would!
Hi Eric, I would have more respect for Mark Bailey and what he has to say, read his book and listen to this interview if you would ask him to unblock me and we could discuss the nonsense he believes that those who control the energy and food supply; ie the industry elites of fossil fuel and animal ag (by far the biggest user of big pharmaceuticals) are actually trying to prevent us access to their products, to take away 'our' chickens and to make us eat ze bugs.
Hey all, thank you for another round of fantastic virus hugger audio! Please keep a lookout, and style points the funnier they are. This is applying actual journalistic pressure; the "gotcha" of it all is how they all pretty much admit they understand the issue but are avoiding it for business or political purposes. That is not a good look. Let's shine some of that Equinox Sun on them -- it's the best disinfectant.
for a hilarious demolition of the "Free Market" start at about 19 minutes...I am so grateful to have worked with The Yes Men in the era of this film, participating in one prank (The New York Post) and doing the Q&A after the film for its run at Time&Space in Hudson. At 19 mins you meet Gilda the Golden Skeleton in the Closet...which flows into Milton Friedman and his followers...these guys emboldened me...Igor, Jacques -- je t'adore.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GG1XeixJqcI
Note to Jon Rappoport
Jon
Your connection of SSRI use to sexual repression and as a result the “gender dysphoria” epidemic answered questions I’ve been wrestling with for years.
As you may know, I’ve been active in various poly, tantra, swing and other scenes as a presenter since the 1990s, and the result of all of this has been impossible to parse out until now.
Previously I explained it with digital consciousness (which is about amputation, and the conversion of sex into the digital environment) and overload of gender chemicals (“forever chemicals”) but your idea goes right to the core of the emotional chaos involved. Certainly digital exposure and xenoestrogenic chemicals are not helping matters.
Also, I am an adept at expanding your theories, and my connection of this to the sense of panic around ordinary heterosexual attraction completes the idea — and explains why people who are wholesome, respectful and open/conversant can be considered predators.
Those “woke” zombies must be pretty angry under all that altered chemistry, delusion and suppressed feeling. I believe that SSRIs do nearly permanent damage, so if 20% are using today, cycle that same percentage through all the past users.
I wonder how many haven’t experienced a good orgasm or bowel movement in 10 years…
efc
Because I have experienced it myself numerous times, I can tell you Dr. Mercola is talking about censorship. In recent years, on those occasions when Dr, Mercola talked about viruses, I've offered a counter discussion. I'm always civil and I never resort to ad hominem attacks, nor do I use foul language. I'm censored merely for presenting evidence about the unresolved virus issue. The last time was just over a week ago when I had several comments taken down.
This is rich coming from a man who has spent a lot of word capitol on his site whining about being censored by The Center for Countering Digital Hate for being part of the Misinformation Dozen.
I'll be posting tomorrow about my experience with CHD on this topic.
Great work Eric.
Half way through, managed to get around temporary problems with the recording around the first music break. No surprise, SUPERB!
Something struck me about a common point shared by all four of the presenter teams, in spite of certain apparent differences. Mercola and Humphries were down on the idea of "virus denial" ostensibly because viruses are real. He didn't say the question is unimportant.
Del Bigtree was down on that idea because it threatens to get in the way of his allegedly imminent success regarding the bringing Fauci and the other culpable people to justice. He deemed the question a barrier to this.
Latypova/Ruby, and Fitts/Broze both focused on how the virus question was unimportant and a total diversion from the real work, fighting repressive measures.
What all four teams are actually doing is brand protection, and doing so in different ways because they have different brands. Mercola is heavily invested in "alternative treatments." What's the point of "treatments" if the viruses which require them can't be shown to exist? Not good for sales.
Bigtree's big thing is ICAN, which pursues legal measures and remedies. His focus is on legal actions against and punishment of the perpetrators. And don't you dare ruin his case.
And Laypova/Ruby and Fitts/Broze are about "exposing and fighting fraud." It doesn't really matter to them what the causes of the events are, they just wanna win points for uncovering "wrong-doing." Astounding how they can deem the matter of whether the entity whose alleged existence and pathogenic nature were used to shut down the world actually even exists to be unimportant.
I still wonder why some of us were skeptical to one degree or another from the beginning of 2020 and to this day many others believe the narrative lock stock and barrel. I began questioning HIV/AIDS 20 years ago when I stumbled into the work of the Perth Group and when I saw Fauci popping up like a bobble head in 2020 I sensed that something wasn't right. The lockdowns and other extreme measures seemed so off to me. I remember driving buy a Trader Joe's grocery store and people were lined up around the corner in masks, standing feet apart from one another as if it was just the normal thing to do. Then the guy who went biking past me all by himself along a sidewalk without anyone else, WEARING A MASK, that I new group insanity was truly upon us. When I mentioned that on Facebook, I was stunned when a couple people defended the masked-biker dude, saying he was just preventing virus from spreading in the air. Then my brother asked me where all the ventilators were going to come from when people were dying in the streets (which never happened). Several friends and family members pushed me to get the vax (which I never did), and one of them who advertised on FB each booster he got, ended up in the hospital for a week with 'covid'. I'm the dude who masked the least amount possible, was in coffee shops, going to the gym, didn't get vaxxed, and being in public when possible, and never had 'covid' to this day.
I heard an exchange between Catherine Austin Fitts and Tom Cowan from earlier than a year ago, I believe, but I don't know exactly when. It was linked on her Solari Report website. And in that clip she admitted to Tom that she knew viruses did not exist, but she wouldn't say it because, she claimed, she couldn't explain the science of it to her Tennessee neighbors. That was when I decided to stop subscribing to her website. It was so clearly a bald-faced lie--she is brilliant, there's no way she couldn't find ways to explain it to anyone. And it was a rather condescending insult to Tennesseans! Does she really think that little of her neighbors' ability to think and understand? I wonder if this is the interview she mentions in the clip with Derrick Broze.
The Mercola-Humphries discussion is a real piece of work. I discuss it in my latest Substack post, Newsletter, 3/1/24. Outright pushing censorship of people like us while speaking of several alleged viruses as if they are undeniable facts, entities proven to exist via the scientific method rather than computer files.
Hiya
It would be good journalistic practice to ask whether renowned low carb high fat 'nutritionist' Tim Noakes (who wrote the preface) or the Baileys receive any funding from Tom Cowan's Weston A. Price Foundation or other such animal ag industry funded front groups. The Bailey's video on bugs that I was initially blocked from was heavily biased in its favour. I know that Joe Rogan is funded by the meat industry and is also very skewed.
I think that the opposite of the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect ('you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story (you know about), and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate') is happening. We read what we agree with, maybe it crystallises what we subconsciously suspected, about 'viruses' and health for example, we research ourselves and everything checks out. We feel part of a wider group. We then turn the page and because we now like, trust and feel allied with the authors we don't do the same critical analysis. Or maybe we do know better but keep quiet, like Dawn Lester and David Parker so as not to be dumped out of the group and lose our followers.
I wish the psychopathic eugenicists would 'sleep with the fishes'....
Here's the Ruby/Latypova interview, Eric. Having listened to the whole thing, I think it's fair enough to say that Ruby is equivacatory -- "I'd prefer to keep an open mind," she says at one point. But Latypova's position is so diametrically opposite to the words you put into her mouth that I think you have an ethical responsibility to issue a retraction/correction. Hell, she even says that she loves the work of Cowan/Kaufman/Baileys, and that it has informed her own thinking.
And I hope that you will interview her. I'd of course heard her name before, but didn't know anything about her. Judging by this conversation, she's definitely got it going on both intellectually and morally.
https://drjaneruby.podbean.com/e/after-talk-with-sasha-latypova-identifying-controlled-opposition/
To my ears, you completely misunderstood the Ruby/Latypova exchange, Eric. Ruby said that there SHOULD be scientific debate. Latypova agreed, then allowed that it would have been reasonable to take some countermeasures, whatever the cause of a large health event were, IF it had been shewn "WITHOUT FAKING IT, AND WITHOUT MURDERING PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL" that such an event were actually taking place.
And with Austin-Fitts, it sounded to me like she was saying that to HER it didn't matter what the pretext was for the launching of full-on 1984, because the point is that they were DOING it. And, by implication, if/when the pretext is acknowledged to be bogus, they'll simply memory-hole that pretext, push out a different one, and continue to implement the "New Normal". But she didn't say (at least not in the clip you played) that OTHER people shouldn't be making a stink about the no-virus issue; just that for her it wasn't a priority.
Maybe I'm nuts -- but that's what I heard in those two clips. I personally think they're both valid points. (Obviously, Mercola and Humphries are insane.)
Listened to the second half. Actually, i already heard Eric with Dr Mark Bailey a couple of days ago and commented on that on that segment's own page, posted a couple of days ago. SOLID GOLD. And really good segment about Prozac and gender dysphoria. Reminds me of numerous animals which underwent sex changes due to environmental pollution, particularly water-borne life. GRRR!
Here is my comment about the Mark Bailey interview segment.
Jeffrey Strahl
Lockdown Times
Feb 28
·edited Feb 28
My comments. PHENOMENAL interview. Some key points were covered. The alleged virus genome is an “in silico” entity. It is nothing but a computer file filled with code, assembled out of short strands of code corresponding to short strands of nucleic acid found in a cell culture experiment. The strands are the results of mixing extracts from humans with tissue, most commonly green monkey kidney cells. antibiotics (poisonous to kidney cells), and nutrients. This stew is allowed to brew, and is then mixed, including the cutting up of all nucleic acid segments into ones shorter than around 5-600 base pairs, translating into code, and loading into a computer program or two or more, and using software to do the assembly.
There is a deliberate attempt to call this “sequencing,” making it seem just like taking DNA from known organisms and breaking it down into ordered chains of adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine (A, C, G, T), the four basic genetic nucleic acids (RNA has uracil instead of thymine, and any which is in the mix is changed via an additive into thymine). Something made via assembling pieces whose origin is never established (unknown provenance), an entity which exists only in a computer and has never been shown to actually exist in nature, let alone shown to be pathogenic, is being presented as a real existing physical organism.
In fact, this computer-only entity is used as the basis for designing tests like the PCR which then are said to determine whether someone has ‘COVID” (or indeed anything else). This is done by providing the test with short segments of code which are alleged to come from this compute-only alleged entity. This has been a testing pandemic. And there is a history of creating stories about viruses and alleging that they account for sicknesses which are actually the result of toxic chemicals degrading our environment.
Regarding Betty Dotson and cannabis lowering sexual inhibitions. First time i ever got high on cannabis was also my first time experiencing free love (with the woman who turned me on). I had experienced commercial sex before, but this was of course very different. Coincidentally, the first woman i had intercourse with under commercial circumstances, in fact my first three times, offered me some cannabis our second time, i wasn't ready.
And people go along out of fear. And/or because they are invested in the idea that “i got sick with “COVID,” family members got it, friends got it….,” or because that’s what a celebrity they trust in says is true, or because they don’t trust their own understanding of physical reality at all (especially in regarding to health) and believe “experts,”…. For example, I had the experience of a decades-long friend attack me for being out of touch with modern science and not understanding that “experts” don’t need to do physical explorations, they can just use computers, and that all my friends who say otherwise (including the ones with solid science credentials) know nothing (he himself has never finished community college!). He is in charge of five (!) Facebook groups.
I sure hope that this video and the book which Doctors Mark and Sam Bailey have released can help widen true understanding and push back the night of know nothingness. Cockroaches scurry off once the lights are turned on.
Harking back to 2020 and the first few days of lock-down I could not help but wonder then how the virus spread so quickly from Wuhan to Las Vegas. Was someone from Vegas in Wuhan and at that market? I had been using the I Ching for over fifty years for guidance in my passage. And I used it as a tool to make ideal passage through my life and as an instrument to determine right action. It had never let me down provided I followed its counsel. So three days into the lock-down I asked the I Ching this question: Given this pandemic what ought I to be doing about it? I knew if I followed its counsel rather than CNN’s counsel I would be right with what is going on. I received in reply Hexagram 35, Progress, the third line moving. Hexagram 35 is one of the most favorable in the book and pictures the sun rising rapidly over the earth. A bright image. The moving line, likewise one of the most favorable in the book, reads “All are in accord. Remorse disappears.” Hmmmm. Such a glowing oracle for supposedly a dismal situation in the external world. Why hadn't I received something like hexagram 29, Danger? Or hex. 47, Exhaustion? Or hex. 39, Obstruction? Or this line from hexagram 63: "The finest clothes turn to rags. Be careful all day long" Or any of the many other hexagrams and lines which would warn of dire circumstances or counsel one to caution? I quit listening to CNN or any other mainstream media broadcasts and started listening to myself and looking at actual conditions in my neighborhood and environs. Nothing had changed much, but for the fact that there were masks abounding and public places were closing, but I didn’t see lines of emergency vehicles nor hearses. I am retired so I did not lose a full-time job or anything like that. So I lived joyfully day to day as though nothing dangerous were going on. My partner and I went on one of the loveliest vacations that summer. We went to Mesa Verde National park, home of the cliff dwellings. If restaurants required masks we donned them, ate, and then took them off. We did not wipe down the hotel rooms we stayed in those four days. Because people were afraid to travel there were very, very few tourists in the Park which enhanced our enjoyment of it and enabled us to get cut-rate lodgings inside the park. Thank you lock-down! I had been following Eric’s astrological talks on YouTube for several years. Now I listened intently as he exposed the faux-demic and increased my confidence in my original doubts. I never got the vaccine nor have I ever received a flu shot. Last time I had the flu was 1987. I try to live healthfully, take my supplements and exercise. Btw I had been hospitalized twice in 2020 for non-respiratory related reasons and never saw piles of bodies in the corridors nor hearses lined up at the hospital. I tested negative both times for covid. But then I knew I would!
Ken
Hi Eric, I would have more respect for Mark Bailey and what he has to say, read his book and listen to this interview if you would ask him to unblock me and we could discuss the nonsense he believes that those who control the energy and food supply; ie the industry elites of fossil fuel and animal ag (by far the biggest user of big pharmaceuticals) are actually trying to prevent us access to their products, to take away 'our' chickens and to make us eat ze bugs.
Eric. James Lindsey or Lindsay. Who is he?