DEW is what some allege is the way the fires were started, The really crucial question is why the conditions which enabled the fires to happen existed in the first place. Those are 1. the unprecedented dryness of the terrain, with LA (meaning downtown) picking up .03 inches of rain this season, vs an average of 4.65 inches at this point in the season, in the context of two previous unusually wet years, which led to lots of unusual growth in vegetation in open spaces, plants which have dried up, serving as fuel. 2. The unusually late occurrence of severe Santa Ana winds. Such occurrences have been forecast to happen later and later in the season due to the rising average global temp, likewise unusually severe swings back and forth between heavy rainfall and drought,
It goes much further than dryness, but if you haven't been keeping up with what geoengineering really is and its several operations (including microwave / plasma fires), then you'll miss the 6" of compacted aluminum nanoparticles in the soil (heats up fast), the fact that the trees didn't burn (as was true on Maui and in northern CA) except for "arsonists" who added that confusing touch to this fire, and I suppose other anomalies I'll be studying over the next couple of weeks.
What created the record dryness, one year after one of the wettest seasons ever, creating lots of weeds which have become fuel, and the unusually late Santa Ana wind e event? Without that, no amount of human intervention would have caused such fires. Explain how "geoengineering" can change global circulation patterns. And please spare me Dane Wignington.
we don't really know what geoengineering includes. we do not understand the scope of the program or the true nature of the technology being used. 90% of what we do today would be incomprehensible to us even 25-30 years ago.
Something has to be technically feasible before one can even think about a working model. Climate science, i.e. thermodynamics and fluid mechanics/gas dynamics overall basic theory, has not changed at all over the last 25-30 years. The atmosphere has changed, but not the basic dynamics.
The amount of energy necessary to change the course of the jet streams is many, many times the total amount of the planet's generating capacity per year many times over. People just don't seem to understand this when they start chanting "geoengineering." Climate science is not virology. It features experiments which can be replicated and falsified, and feature independent variables. No technology has solved that. I have studied this stuff.
Starting fires is a different kettle of fish, though one wonders why expensive satellites would be used vs small teams of operatives with blowtorches.
Aluminum is the chaff the military industrial complex likes for keeping the atmosphere dry for wireless operations, and it has 4X the surface area of other heavy metals, and it's cheap. It keeps things nice and dry, which is why in the summer I hear people saying, "Boy, it's hot. I feel like I'm being microwaved."
Nor does any of that disprove the concept of geoengineering or DEWs. We need to know the WHOLE story. I think your persistent doubts are misplaced and do not reveal an open or receptive mind.
You are asking me to disprove an idea which has never been proven? Isn't that like disproving the existence of viruses? Why not? I maintain consistency. Anything asserted needs to be proven, not up to me or anyone else to disprove it. The concept itself requires amounts of energy beyond anything imaginable, so anyone asserting it has to prove how that's done.
If DEW was used, then they are employing the on-foot arsonists as their scapegoat. That's a possibility, but I haven't seen stunning DEW evidence quite yet.
I'm curious if we will learn more with the Sun-Mars opposition tomorrow. The LA "wildfire" attack was conveniently in sync with Mars retrograde's ingress into Cancer.
My sense after sitting with this for a week is that there may be an opportunity here to test out their equipment and methods, under the scrim and smog of war, so it's not so noticeable (and of course, unbelievable). And while I have set aside this issue on past cases, it started to make itself known in the Hawaii situation in 2023 and this whole scene reeks of planning and intent. So nothing is off the table.
That makes sense. They always seem to be testing their limits and what they can get away with. Enough time has elapsed with the Maui situation that it now seems obvious it was a land grab. In California's case, I imagine they'll be enthusiastic to build for the 2028 Olympics
Heads I win, tails you loose is a loss for everyone in my view.
On I different note, I knew that the suffragette bombings in England happened and didn’t question the ethics thereof! Hmm talk about a blind spot on my part. Again this is highly illuminating.
I write books about what geoengineering is really up to for laymen. I've studied all the "great fires" that receive world media coverage (and lying), and this one strikes me as plasma. Is there some way I can attach a video to an email for you?
There actually was a practical megawatt laser satellite developed during the Star Wars program. It was a DF chemical laser with a 3.4 micron wavelength. This wavelength can reach the ground from space in a diffraction-limited spot size of just a few meters. A 1 MW laser in space would absolutely be able to ignite wood. For anyone interested in learning more about this, please see my previous post:
A lot of information is coming in by email, from people who have reason to know what they are talking about it -- including someone who worked with this technology. It is low energy and I have no doubt that it's happening. Whether here, I don't know. But it's real.
Edison (Power Company) - says need to see if their electrical infrastructure caused the fire
"Typically, when there's a spark created by equipment, we will see the electrical anomaly -- we haven't seen that," Pizarro said of a possible incident involving Edison infrastructure and the Hurst Fire burning outside of San Fernando.
"That said, we have not been able to get close to the equipment," he continued. "As soon as we can get close to it, we'll inspect and be transparent with the public."
"We may find something different," Pizarro added.
LA fires live updates: Edison International can't rule out role of equipment
Hello. I am not in California but, I have 44 years of experience as a radio frequency engineer. I do not take credit for the following video clip and do not know who actually filmed it. I can say however, that this is the most damning evidence I have ever seen regarding the use of DEW. When I saw the clip I immediately knew what caused it. If anyone needs an explanation if the resulting reaction, I will be glad to help as this needs to be stopped.
This article (source data somewhat less that pristine, e.g. tiktok) shows a video that claims a lot of these fires were all set at the same exact time, so the satellite data sources (if not already scrubbed) could potentially confirm that in an unbiased manner...
No idea of the exact time, but I'll see if I can find it on lunch break. Who knows as to the 2nd question. Maybe too many other paying users of the satellite data to scrub it all....
Let's not forget this
https://www.wattstrialfirm.com/powerful-results/historic-13-billion-pge-wildfire-settlemen/
DEW is what some allege is the way the fires were started, The really crucial question is why the conditions which enabled the fires to happen existed in the first place. Those are 1. the unprecedented dryness of the terrain, with LA (meaning downtown) picking up .03 inches of rain this season, vs an average of 4.65 inches at this point in the season, in the context of two previous unusually wet years, which led to lots of unusual growth in vegetation in open spaces, plants which have dried up, serving as fuel. 2. The unusually late occurrence of severe Santa Ana winds. Such occurrences have been forecast to happen later and later in the season due to the rising average global temp, likewise unusually severe swings back and forth between heavy rainfall and drought,
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006GL025808
Climate change projected fire weather sensitivity: California Santa Ana wind occurrence. Norman L. Miller, Nicole J. Schlegel, 8/15/06
It goes much further than dryness, but if you haven't been keeping up with what geoengineering really is and its several operations (including microwave / plasma fires), then you'll miss the 6" of compacted aluminum nanoparticles in the soil (heats up fast), the fact that the trees didn't burn (as was true on Maui and in northern CA) except for "arsonists" who added that confusing touch to this fire, and I suppose other anomalies I'll be studying over the next couple of weeks.
yeah probably a crust of aluminum on everything. this is not natural...
What created the record dryness, one year after one of the wettest seasons ever, creating lots of weeds which have become fuel, and the unusually late Santa Ana wind e event? Without that, no amount of human intervention would have caused such fires. Explain how "geoengineering" can change global circulation patterns. And please spare me Dane Wignington.
we don't really know what geoengineering includes. we do not understand the scope of the program or the true nature of the technology being used. 90% of what we do today would be incomprehensible to us even 25-30 years ago.
Not true anymore. We know a lot. My 4th geoengineering book comes out from Inner Traditions on Feb. 4, 2025.
Elena
would you please ask your publisher to send me a press copy and are you interested in appearing on my program?
efc
Something has to be technically feasible before one can even think about a working model. Climate science, i.e. thermodynamics and fluid mechanics/gas dynamics overall basic theory, has not changed at all over the last 25-30 years. The atmosphere has changed, but not the basic dynamics.
The amount of energy necessary to change the course of the jet streams is many, many times the total amount of the planet's generating capacity per year many times over. People just don't seem to understand this when they start chanting "geoengineering." Climate science is not virology. It features experiments which can be replicated and falsified, and feature independent variables. No technology has solved that. I have studied this stuff.
Starting fires is a different kettle of fish, though one wonders why expensive satellites would be used vs small teams of operatives with blowtorches.
Believe me, you won't hear a word from me about Mr. Wigington. He constitutes a "limited hangout."
So let's hear your theory of how humans can consciously and predictably change the path of jet streams during a short segment of time.
Aluminum is the chaff the military industrial complex likes for keeping the atmosphere dry for wireless operations, and it has 4X the surface area of other heavy metals, and it's cheap. It keeps things nice and dry, which is why in the summer I hear people saying, "Boy, it's hot. I feel like I'm being microwaved."
and I imagine very flammable...
Does it account for record low rainfall? Or the whiplash vs last year? Or the unusually late intense Santa Ana event? NO!!
Nor does any of that disprove the concept of geoengineering or DEWs. We need to know the WHOLE story. I think your persistent doubts are misplaced and do not reveal an open or receptive mind.
You are asking me to disprove an idea which has never been proven? Isn't that like disproving the existence of viruses? Why not? I maintain consistency. Anything asserted needs to be proven, not up to me or anyone else to disprove it. The concept itself requires amounts of energy beyond anything imaginable, so anyone asserting it has to prove how that's done.
I am looking into the DEW theory, I've explored briefly on my Substack: https://tara4america.substack.com/p/dew-point-is-la-the-next-maui
If DEW was used, then they are employing the on-foot arsonists as their scapegoat. That's a possibility, but I haven't seen stunning DEW evidence quite yet.
I'm curious if we will learn more with the Sun-Mars opposition tomorrow. The LA "wildfire" attack was conveniently in sync with Mars retrograde's ingress into Cancer.
it's all over the chart...that Mercury Mars.
My sense after sitting with this for a week is that there may be an opportunity here to test out their equipment and methods, under the scrim and smog of war, so it's not so noticeable (and of course, unbelievable). And while I have set aside this issue on past cases, it started to make itself known in the Hawaii situation in 2023 and this whole scene reeks of planning and intent. So nothing is off the table.
That makes sense. They always seem to be testing their limits and what they can get away with. Enough time has elapsed with the Maui situation that it now seems obvious it was a land grab. In California's case, I imagine they'll be enthusiastic to build for the 2028 Olympics
Heads I win, tails you loose is a loss for everyone in my view.
On I different note, I knew that the suffragette bombings in England happened and didn’t question the ethics thereof! Hmm talk about a blind spot on my part. Again this is highly illuminating.
Also check out independent scientist Clifford Carnicom at carnicominstitute.org.
I write books about what geoengineering is really up to for laymen. I've studied all the "great fires" that receive world media coverage (and lying), and this one strikes me as plasma. Is there some way I can attach a video to an email for you?
My thought on the cars is that if they are electrics then maybe once the batteries ignite the rest of the car burns.
forbidden_truth_ instagram has some stuff. Unburnt trees
Live, healthy trees mitigate fire.
There actually was a practical megawatt laser satellite developed during the Star Wars program. It was a DF chemical laser with a 3.4 micron wavelength. This wavelength can reach the ground from space in a diffraction-limited spot size of just a few meters. A 1 MW laser in space would absolutely be able to ignite wood. For anyone interested in learning more about this, please see my previous post:
https://entropywave.substack.com/p/how-to-do-the-dew-an-engineers-guide
A lot of information is coming in by email, from people who have reason to know what they are talking about it -- including someone who worked with this technology. It is low energy and I have no doubt that it's happening. Whether here, I don't know. But it's real.
Yes, there are a lot of possibilities. I’m glad you are aiming to take a comprehensive look at this topic.
from our UFO bureau chief...
Edison (Power Company) - says need to see if their electrical infrastructure caused the fire
"Typically, when there's a spark created by equipment, we will see the electrical anomaly -- we haven't seen that," Pizarro said of a possible incident involving Edison infrastructure and the Hurst Fire burning outside of San Fernando.
"That said, we have not been able to get close to the equipment," he continued. "As soon as we can get close to it, we'll inspect and be transparent with the public."
"We may find something different," Pizarro added.
LA fires live updates: Edison International can't rule out role of equipment
Shawn
Hello. I am not in California but, I have 44 years of experience as a radio frequency engineer. I do not take credit for the following video clip and do not know who actually filmed it. I can say however, that this is the most damning evidence I have ever seen regarding the use of DEW. When I saw the clip I immediately knew what caused it. If anyone needs an explanation if the resulting reaction, I will be glad to help as this needs to be stopped.
I may be reached at mooonmail@protonmail.com
https://substack.com/@looking4truth1/note/c-85480891
beendonebefor. paradiso. that was on x
This article (source data somewhat less that pristine, e.g. tiktok) shows a video that claims a lot of these fires were all set at the same exact time, so the satellite data sources (if not already scrubbed) could potentially confirm that in an unbiased manner...
https://forbiddennews.substack.com/p/satellite-view-of-la-fires-shows
ok if at the same time, what time? And why leave an obvious clue like that?
No idea of the exact time, but I'll see if I can find it on lunch break. Who knows as to the 2nd question. Maybe too many other paying users of the satellite data to scrub it all....
ok thank you. these stories are cracked by very basic documented facts. it's easy to get lost in the sauce.