I write books about what geoengineering is really up to for laymen. I've studied all the "great fires" that receive world media coverage (and lying), and this one strikes me as plasma. Is there some way I can attach a video to an email for you?
DEW is what some allege is the way the fires were started, The really crucial question is why the conditions which enabled the fires to happen existed in the first place. Those are 1. the unprecedented dryness of the terrain, with LA (meaning downtown) picking up .03 inches of rain this season, vs an average of 4.65 inches at this point in the season, in the context of two previous unusually wet years, which led to lots of unusual growth in vegetation in open spaces, plants which have dried up, serving as fuel. 2. The unusually late occurrence of severe Santa Ana winds. Such occurrences have been forecast to happen later and later in the season due to the rising average global temp, likewise unusually severe swings back and forth between heavy rainfall and drought,
It goes much further than dryness, but if you haven't been keeping up with what geoengineering really is and its several operations (including microwave / plasma fires), then you'll miss the 6" of compacted aluminum nanoparticles in the soil (heats up fast), the fact that the trees didn't burn (as was true on Maui and in northern CA) except for "arsonists" who added that confusing touch to this fire, and I suppose other anomalies I'll be studying over the next couple of weeks.
Hi Elana, I heard you speak at G Edward Griffin's Red Pill Expo I believe it was the South Dakota one. I've been to a few. Got in your long line afterwards, met you and bought that gigantic book of yours. Now that is quite a book of study! Great reference book. Look forward to seeing what you find out!
What created the record dryness, one year after one of the wettest seasons ever, creating lots of weeds which have become fuel, and the unusually late Santa Ana wind e event? Without that, no amount of human intervention would have caused such fires. Explain how "geoengineering" can change global circulation patterns. And please spare me Dane Wignington.
we don't really know what geoengineering includes. we do not understand the scope of the program or the true nature of the technology being used. 90% of what we do today would be incomprehensible to us even 25-30 years ago.
This is my view too. Though there is a lot more known now but I always feel that we aren't privy to much at all. Therefore how could we know all of it?
Something has to be technically feasible before one can even think about a working model. Climate science, i.e. thermodynamics and fluid mechanics/gas dynamics overall basic theory, has not changed at all over the last 25-30 years. The atmosphere has changed, but not the basic dynamics.
The amount of energy necessary to change the course of the jet streams is many, many times the total amount of the planet's generating capacity per year many times over. People just don't seem to understand this when they start chanting "geoengineering." Climate science is not virology. It features experiments which can be replicated and falsified, and feature independent variables. No technology has solved that. I have studied this stuff.
Starting fires is a different kettle of fish, though one wonders why expensive satellites would be used vs small teams of operatives with blowtorches.
Aluminum is the chaff the military industrial complex likes for keeping the atmosphere dry for wireless operations, and it has 4X the surface area of other heavy metals, and it's cheap. It keeps things nice and dry, which is why in the summer I hear people saying, "Boy, it's hot. I feel like I'm being microwaved."
Nor does any of that disprove the concept of geoengineering or DEWs. We need to know the WHOLE story. I think your persistent doubts are misplaced and do not reveal an open or receptive mind.
You are asking me to disprove an idea which has never been proven? Isn't that like disproving the existence of viruses? Why not? I maintain consistency. Anything asserted needs to be proven, not up to me or anyone else to disprove it. The concept itself requires amounts of energy beyond anything imaginable, so anyone asserting it has to prove how that's done.
Real Genius and Blow Out, both movies explore attacks from different angles. Imagine a guy or several guys with a bunch of molotov cocktails or 5 gallon gas cans on a day when the wind is howling through the canyons. My girlfriend just got a new wood stove with a fancy draft system, I'm amazed at how quickly the logs gets roaring with just 1 small piece of lit paper. Not sure I have a point. I amazed that my left leaning friends see the fires as proof of "climate change" and can't imagine institutions starting the fires intentionally.
If DEW was used, then they are employing the on-foot arsonists as their scapegoat. That's a possibility, but I haven't seen stunning DEW evidence quite yet.
I'm curious if we will learn more with the Sun-Mars opposition tomorrow. The LA "wildfire" attack was conveniently in sync with Mars retrograde's ingress into Cancer.
My sense after sitting with this for a week is that there may be an opportunity here to test out their equipment and methods, under the scrim and smog of war, so it's not so noticeable (and of course, unbelievable). And while I have set aside this issue on past cases, it started to make itself known in the Hawaii situation in 2023 and this whole scene reeks of planning and intent. So nothing is off the table.
That makes sense. They always seem to be testing their limits and what they can get away with. Enough time has elapsed with the Maui situation that it now seems obvious it was a land grab. In California's case, I imagine they'll be enthusiastic to build for the 2028 Olympics
There actually was a practical megawatt laser satellite developed during the Star Wars program. It was a DF chemical laser with a 3.4 micron wavelength. This wavelength can reach the ground from space in a diffraction-limited spot size of just a few meters. A 1 MW laser in space would absolutely be able to ignite wood. For anyone interested in learning more about this, please see my previous post:
A lot of information is coming in by email, from people who have reason to know what they are talking about it -- including someone who worked with this technology. It is low energy and I have no doubt that it's happening. Whether here, I don't know. But it's real.
Edison (Power Company) - says need to see if their electrical infrastructure caused the fire
"Typically, when there's a spark created by equipment, we will see the electrical anomaly -- we haven't seen that," Pizarro said of a possible incident involving Edison infrastructure and the Hurst Fire burning outside of San Fernando.
"That said, we have not been able to get close to the equipment," he continued. "As soon as we can get close to it, we'll inspect and be transparent with the public."
"We may find something different," Pizarro added.
LA fires live updates: Edison International can't rule out role of equipment
Hello. I am not in California but, I have 44 years of experience as a radio frequency engineer. I do not take credit for the following video clip and do not know who actually filmed it. I can say however, that this is the most damning evidence I have ever seen regarding the use of DEW. When I saw the clip I immediately knew what caused it. If anyone needs an explanation if the resulting reaction, I will be glad to help as this needs to be stopped.
Radio Frequency Engineer. That is neat. Please explain what we saw and why you are certain it is what you claim thanks a lot! Or what else you may think it may be too.
Very interesting. I hate to be that guy, but after I learned what you can do with After Effects, when I see videos I always ask first "could I do that on AE?" and if the answer is "probably yes", I think we need more. Maybe other videos of the same event, other angles etc. Just saying.
The drones have been spraying the mystery fog all around the world. It has been reported in 33 states in the US. I have been told by a couple of people that the fog was in LA two days before the fires began. Can anyone verify this?
Hello. I saw a couple of comments on how this looked like the cluster bombs used in wars. It looks to me to be exactly what I spent much of my career trying to prevent.
Keep in mind that all materials have a resonant frequency, the ideal frequency at which the molecular bond will begin to breakdown. It’s not that different from accidentally getting a piece of aluminum foil into your microwave. The more ferromagnetic a material is, the easier this reaction occurs for example.. if one applies a steady sine wave into the air @ a frequency of 450 kilohertz in the vicinity of mild steel, the molecules will vibrate so violently that the metal will heat up and at some point reach Curie, the amount of time mainly dependent on the power of the signal. At that point it will get white hot, and liquify. That process is referred to as induction. We performed some experiments where we superimposed two waves of different frequencies. Depending on the frequencies, some strange things would begin to occur such as objects levitating, flying across the room, or even turning to dust. (Ever wonder how the twin towers were reduced to dust?). Anyway, smoke contains many of such metallic and carbon-bound components. When exposed to such waveforms, the particles in the smoke react the same way. They heat up and quickly disintegrate. Keep in mind that any amount of humidity in the air will intensify and accelerate the process due to unfiltered water having electrical conductivity. (Electrolytes). Once the particles get sufficiently charged, the air between them will begin to break down into conductive plasma, which causes the explosions. It appears in the video that the wave is moving or passing, what would usually be referred to as a sweep if done intentionally. I imagine due to this reaction, they more than likely try to avoid the areas where smoke is already present. Although this would likely make your appliance permanently smell bad, a similar reaction could be created by setting fire to a piece of black rubber and heating it in the microwave.
Heads I win, tails you loose is a loss for everyone in my view.
On I different note, I knew that the suffragette bombings in England happened and didn’t question the ethics thereof! Hmm talk about a blind spot on my part. Again this is highly illuminating.
Let's not forget this
https://www.wattstrialfirm.com/powerful-results/historic-13-billion-pge-wildfire-settlemen/
I write books about what geoengineering is really up to for laymen. I've studied all the "great fires" that receive world media coverage (and lying), and this one strikes me as plasma. Is there some way I can attach a video to an email for you?
DEW is what some allege is the way the fires were started, The really crucial question is why the conditions which enabled the fires to happen existed in the first place. Those are 1. the unprecedented dryness of the terrain, with LA (meaning downtown) picking up .03 inches of rain this season, vs an average of 4.65 inches at this point in the season, in the context of two previous unusually wet years, which led to lots of unusual growth in vegetation in open spaces, plants which have dried up, serving as fuel. 2. The unusually late occurrence of severe Santa Ana winds. Such occurrences have been forecast to happen later and later in the season due to the rising average global temp, likewise unusually severe swings back and forth between heavy rainfall and drought,
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006GL025808
Climate change projected fire weather sensitivity: California Santa Ana wind occurrence. Norman L. Miller, Nicole J. Schlegel, 8/15/06
It goes much further than dryness, but if you haven't been keeping up with what geoengineering really is and its several operations (including microwave / plasma fires), then you'll miss the 6" of compacted aluminum nanoparticles in the soil (heats up fast), the fact that the trees didn't burn (as was true on Maui and in northern CA) except for "arsonists" who added that confusing touch to this fire, and I suppose other anomalies I'll be studying over the next couple of weeks.
yeah probably a crust of aluminum on everything. this is not natural...
Hi Elana, I heard you speak at G Edward Griffin's Red Pill Expo I believe it was the South Dakota one. I've been to a few. Got in your long line afterwards, met you and bought that gigantic book of yours. Now that is quite a book of study! Great reference book. Look forward to seeing what you find out!
What created the record dryness, one year after one of the wettest seasons ever, creating lots of weeds which have become fuel, and the unusually late Santa Ana wind e event? Without that, no amount of human intervention would have caused such fires. Explain how "geoengineering" can change global circulation patterns. And please spare me Dane Wignington.
we don't really know what geoengineering includes. we do not understand the scope of the program or the true nature of the technology being used. 90% of what we do today would be incomprehensible to us even 25-30 years ago.
Not true anymore. We know a lot. My 4th geoengineering book comes out from Inner Traditions on Feb. 4, 2025.
Elena
would you please ask your publisher to send me a press copy and are you interested in appearing on my program?
efc
I will buy your new book Elana.
This is my view too. Though there is a lot more known now but I always feel that we aren't privy to much at all. Therefore how could we know all of it?
Something has to be technically feasible before one can even think about a working model. Climate science, i.e. thermodynamics and fluid mechanics/gas dynamics overall basic theory, has not changed at all over the last 25-30 years. The atmosphere has changed, but not the basic dynamics.
The amount of energy necessary to change the course of the jet streams is many, many times the total amount of the planet's generating capacity per year many times over. People just don't seem to understand this when they start chanting "geoengineering." Climate science is not virology. It features experiments which can be replicated and falsified, and feature independent variables. No technology has solved that. I have studied this stuff.
Starting fires is a different kettle of fish, though one wonders why expensive satellites would be used vs small teams of operatives with blowtorches.
Believe me, you won't hear a word from me about Mr. Wigington. He constitutes a "limited hangout."
So let's hear your theory of how humans can consciously and predictably change the path of jet streams during a short segment of time.
Aluminum is the chaff the military industrial complex likes for keeping the atmosphere dry for wireless operations, and it has 4X the surface area of other heavy metals, and it's cheap. It keeps things nice and dry, which is why in the summer I hear people saying, "Boy, it's hot. I feel like I'm being microwaved."
and I imagine very flammable...
Does it account for record low rainfall? Or the whiplash vs last year? Or the unusually late intense Santa Ana event? NO!!
Nor does any of that disprove the concept of geoengineering or DEWs. We need to know the WHOLE story. I think your persistent doubts are misplaced and do not reveal an open or receptive mind.
You are asking me to disprove an idea which has never been proven? Isn't that like disproving the existence of viruses? Why not? I maintain consistency. Anything asserted needs to be proven, not up to me or anyone else to disprove it. The concept itself requires amounts of energy beyond anything imaginable, so anyone asserting it has to prove how that's done.
Real Genius and Blow Out, both movies explore attacks from different angles. Imagine a guy or several guys with a bunch of molotov cocktails or 5 gallon gas cans on a day when the wind is howling through the canyons. My girlfriend just got a new wood stove with a fancy draft system, I'm amazed at how quickly the logs gets roaring with just 1 small piece of lit paper. Not sure I have a point. I amazed that my left leaning friends see the fires as proof of "climate change" and can't imagine institutions starting the fires intentionally.
This is a big sales pitch for the "climate change" angle. All that aluminum sure goes up quick.
I am looking into the DEW theory, I've explored briefly on my Substack: https://tara4america.substack.com/p/dew-point-is-la-the-next-maui
If DEW was used, then they are employing the on-foot arsonists as their scapegoat. That's a possibility, but I haven't seen stunning DEW evidence quite yet.
I'm curious if we will learn more with the Sun-Mars opposition tomorrow. The LA "wildfire" attack was conveniently in sync with Mars retrograde's ingress into Cancer.
it's all over the chart...that Mercury Mars.
My sense after sitting with this for a week is that there may be an opportunity here to test out their equipment and methods, under the scrim and smog of war, so it's not so noticeable (and of course, unbelievable). And while I have set aside this issue on past cases, it started to make itself known in the Hawaii situation in 2023 and this whole scene reeks of planning and intent. So nothing is off the table.
That makes sense. They always seem to be testing their limits and what they can get away with. Enough time has elapsed with the Maui situation that it now seems obvious it was a land grab. In California's case, I imagine they'll be enthusiastic to build for the 2028 Olympics
Also check out independent scientist Clifford Carnicom at carnicominstitute.org.
forbidden_truth_ instagram has some stuff. Unburnt trees
Live, healthy trees mitigate fire.
There actually was a practical megawatt laser satellite developed during the Star Wars program. It was a DF chemical laser with a 3.4 micron wavelength. This wavelength can reach the ground from space in a diffraction-limited spot size of just a few meters. A 1 MW laser in space would absolutely be able to ignite wood. For anyone interested in learning more about this, please see my previous post:
https://entropywave.substack.com/p/how-to-do-the-dew-an-engineers-guide
A lot of information is coming in by email, from people who have reason to know what they are talking about it -- including someone who worked with this technology. It is low energy and I have no doubt that it's happening. Whether here, I don't know. But it's real.
Yes, there are a lot of possibilities. I’m glad you are aiming to take a comprehensive look at this topic.
from our UFO bureau chief...
Edison (Power Company) - says need to see if their electrical infrastructure caused the fire
"Typically, when there's a spark created by equipment, we will see the electrical anomaly -- we haven't seen that," Pizarro said of a possible incident involving Edison infrastructure and the Hurst Fire burning outside of San Fernando.
"That said, we have not been able to get close to the equipment," he continued. "As soon as we can get close to it, we'll inspect and be transparent with the public."
"We may find something different," Pizarro added.
LA fires live updates: Edison International can't rule out role of equipment
Shawn
Hello. I am not in California but, I have 44 years of experience as a radio frequency engineer. I do not take credit for the following video clip and do not know who actually filmed it. I can say however, that this is the most damning evidence I have ever seen regarding the use of DEW. When I saw the clip I immediately knew what caused it. If anyone needs an explanation if the resulting reaction, I will be glad to help as this needs to be stopped.
I may be reached at mooonmail@protonmail.com
https://substack.com/@looking4truth1/note/c-85480891
Yeah that is unordinary. Thanks for posting.
Radio Frequency Engineer. That is neat. Please explain what we saw and why you are certain it is what you claim thanks a lot! Or what else you may think it may be too.
Very interesting. I hate to be that guy, but after I learned what you can do with After Effects, when I see videos I always ask first "could I do that on AE?" and if the answer is "probably yes", I think we need more. Maybe other videos of the same event, other angles etc. Just saying.
The drones have been spraying the mystery fog all around the world. It has been reported in 33 states in the US. I have been told by a couple of people that the fog was in LA two days before the fires began. Can anyone verify this?
Hello. I saw a couple of comments on how this looked like the cluster bombs used in wars. It looks to me to be exactly what I spent much of my career trying to prevent.
Keep in mind that all materials have a resonant frequency, the ideal frequency at which the molecular bond will begin to breakdown. It’s not that different from accidentally getting a piece of aluminum foil into your microwave. The more ferromagnetic a material is, the easier this reaction occurs for example.. if one applies a steady sine wave into the air @ a frequency of 450 kilohertz in the vicinity of mild steel, the molecules will vibrate so violently that the metal will heat up and at some point reach Curie, the amount of time mainly dependent on the power of the signal. At that point it will get white hot, and liquify. That process is referred to as induction. We performed some experiments where we superimposed two waves of different frequencies. Depending on the frequencies, some strange things would begin to occur such as objects levitating, flying across the room, or even turning to dust. (Ever wonder how the twin towers were reduced to dust?). Anyway, smoke contains many of such metallic and carbon-bound components. When exposed to such waveforms, the particles in the smoke react the same way. They heat up and quickly disintegrate. Keep in mind that any amount of humidity in the air will intensify and accelerate the process due to unfiltered water having electrical conductivity. (Electrolytes). Once the particles get sufficiently charged, the air between them will begin to break down into conductive plasma, which causes the explosions. It appears in the video that the wave is moving or passing, what would usually be referred to as a sweep if done intentionally. I imagine due to this reaction, they more than likely try to avoid the areas where smoke is already present. Although this would likely make your appliance permanently smell bad, a similar reaction could be created by setting fire to a piece of black rubber and heating it in the microwave.
Smart meters are DEWs. This aspect needs investigation.
Heads I win, tails you loose is a loss for everyone in my view.
On I different note, I knew that the suffragette bombings in England happened and didn’t question the ethics thereof! Hmm talk about a blind spot on my part. Again this is highly illuminating.
My thought on the cars is that if they are electrics then maybe once the batteries ignite the rest of the car burns.
beendonebefor. paradiso. that was on x