Also you are misunderstanding something about Christine's work. She is not trying to establish the existence of the virus. Follow me here, all caps: SHE IS WORKING TO ASCERTAIN THE BASIS BY WHICH PUBLIC HEALTH AUTHORITIES DECLARED THE EMERGENCY OF A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS. Period. Neither she nor I care if the virus exists as some kind of abst…
Also you are misunderstanding something about Christine's work. She is not trying to establish the existence of the virus. Follow me here, all caps: SHE IS WORKING TO ASCERTAIN THE BASIS BY WHICH PUBLIC HEALTH AUTHORITIES DECLARED THE EMERGENCY OF A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS. Period. Neither she nor I care if the virus exists as some kind of abstract entity. We care about the reason that the governments SHUT DOWN THE WORLD but cannot provide evidence supporting THE CLAIM THAT THEY MADE -- OF A VIRUS THAT INFECTS PEOPLE. AND IF THE VIRUS CANNOT BE FOUND INTACT IN A PERSON, AND IT CANNOT THEREFORE BE TESTED FOR, THEN WHY WERE 4.4 BILLION PEOPLE PUT UNDER MARTIAL LAW?
Also you are misunderstanding something about Christine's work. She is not trying to establish the existence of the virus. Follow me here, all caps: SHE IS WORKING TO ASCERTAIN THE BASIS BY WHICH PUBLIC HEALTH AUTHORITIES DECLARED THE EMERGENCY OF A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS. Period. Neither she nor I care if the virus exists as some kind of abstract entity. We care about the reason that the governments SHUT DOWN THE WORLD but cannot provide evidence supporting THE CLAIM THAT THEY MADE -- OF A VIRUS THAT INFECTS PEOPLE. AND IF THE VIRUS CANNOT BE FOUND INTACT IN A PERSON, AND IT CANNOT THEREFORE BE TESTED FOR, THEN WHY WERE 4.4 BILLION PEOPLE PUT UNDER MARTIAL LAW?
I am putting the onus on these institutions to prove their claims! They can't, and the virus is clearly made-up and imaginary :)