To8Perhaps if I'd referred to your commentaries as ironic, it wouldn't have been .seen as insulting. It was not meant to insult or to suggest you were doing such.
Today you were in great form . I hope you have a lovely day.
I'm hard-pressed to discern any sarcasm here. I'd say rather that EFC is not mincing words, that the writing is clear and concise and not taking the currently-in-fashion fawning, subservient tone with respect to any so-called "authorities" and their unsubstantiated theories which have been put forward as "fact". The unelected, bureaucratic "authority" figures who have played fast and loose with the scientific method over many years now deserve nothing more - nor less - from such clear-thinking critics.
Spot on, mate. 🎯
You're a tad sarcastic (at times) but most interesting. Thanks for your efforts. Sorry not to be able to contribute in support.
With best wishes from dasmo (12/10/34)
Doris, where is the sarcasm? I am not here to insult anyone.
To8Perhaps if I'd referred to your commentaries as ironic, it wouldn't have been .seen as insulting. It was not meant to insult or to suggest you were doing such.
Today you were in great form . I hope you have a lovely day.
I'm hard-pressed to discern any sarcasm here. I'd say rather that EFC is not mincing words, that the writing is clear and concise and not taking the currently-in-fashion fawning, subservient tone with respect to any so-called "authorities" and their unsubstantiated theories which have been put forward as "fact". The unelected, bureaucratic "authority" figures who have played fast and loose with the scientific method over many years now deserve nothing more - nor less - from such clear-thinking critics.