In this short presentation, psychologists speak out about the need for reconciliation through truth regarding the events of Sept. 11, 2001. These ideas are fully applicable to our current moment.
At Planet Waves, I am followed around by a copy team — two copy editors, an astrology fact checker, a copy chief to approve and coordinate edits, and a production assistant who also proofreads. We run that on a strict schedule. Producing a Planet Waves article is a time consuming and not inexpensive endeavor.
To get letter-perfect copy takes a group effort.
So as you can see, I care.
At Substack, I am on my own. The project has no budget and no set schedule; and therefore, no editing team awaiting my copy.
Usually Substack letters go out with several errors. Today, the red underlining was off for some reason, and I was bleary-eyed, so it was a mess. But the web edition gets the corrections, while people fixate on the email rather than clicking through.
I always fix them in the web edition, though it can take an hour or so.
Thank you for your offer. I will keep you in mind.
Personal request, would you please pay for your subscription?
I have absolutely unique content and a spiritual angle I just don’t see anywhere else. Despite my typos, I put a tremendous about of work into my articles there.
If you are already paying through Substack, thank you for your consideration — and for your polite letter.
"In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict. These advances will enable lasers with reasonable mass and cost to effect very many kills."
— from New World Vistas, by the US Air Force
"It's politically sensitive, but it's going to happen. Some people don't want to hear this, and it sure isn't in vogue, but -- absolutely -- we're going to fight in space. We're going to fight from space and we're going to fight into space. That's why the U.S. has development programs in directed energy and hit-to-kill mechanisms."
Unfortunately, the A&E Truth people, who I followed and believed this past 17 years, has a problem: Dr. Judy Wood. Her meticulous evidence, which took her something like seven years to document and analyze, refutes their evidence - strongly. And they don't want to acknowledge it, and have simply obfuscated and smeared her assertions. This is not how the real truth behaves. Wood does not claim anything regarding the Who, or the Why of 9/11 - only the What Happened. And A&E actively discourages people from looking at what she has uncovered. It was hard for me, but I have come to understand A&E as a dialectic: a lie with grains of truth, a prepared rabbit hole to catch those of us seeking truth, only to veer us off in a slightly-safer direction. If we truly desire the truth, we will be willing to look at all the evidence, and to consider it thoughtfully. Dr. Wood has no agenda other than empirical evidence and data collection. As in all crime scenes, first you have to establish What happened, before you can determine How, or Who.
My problem with the 9/11 false flag is that just about everyone who can think knows by now that it was a false flag. How much difference does "people being informed" make?
The resulting (un)Patriot(ic) Act, completely unsubstantiated, is still in effect...
For fun, look at the cartoon on top of this article:
I strongly suggest watching this. Judy Wood is a credible witness.
https://www.youtube.com/user/911EmpiricalEvidence
AND
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZJZRxBrS4I
Hi Martha
At Planet Waves, I am followed around by a copy team — two copy editors, an astrology fact checker, a copy chief to approve and coordinate edits, and a production assistant who also proofreads. We run that on a strict schedule. Producing a Planet Waves article is a time consuming and not inexpensive endeavor.
To get letter-perfect copy takes a group effort.
So as you can see, I care.
At Substack, I am on my own. The project has no budget and no set schedule; and therefore, no editing team awaiting my copy.
Usually Substack letters go out with several errors. Today, the red underlining was off for some reason, and I was bleary-eyed, so it was a mess. But the web edition gets the corrections, while people fixate on the email rather than clicking through.
I always fix them in the web edition, though it can take an hour or so.
Thank you for your offer. I will keep you in mind.
Personal request, would you please pay for your subscription?
I have absolutely unique content and a spiritual angle I just don’t see anywhere else. Despite my typos, I put a tremendous about of work into my articles there.
If you are already paying through Substack, thank you for your consideration — and for your polite letter.
efc
Both of these are from c. 1997
"In the next two decades, new technologies will allow the fielding of space-based weapons of devastating effectiveness to be used to deliver energy and mass as force projection in tactical and strategic conflict. These advances will enable lasers with reasonable mass and cost to effect very many kills."
— from New World Vistas, by the US Air Force
"It's politically sensitive, but it's going to happen. Some people don't want to hear this, and it sure isn't in vogue, but -- absolutely -- we're going to fight in space. We're going to fight from space and we're going to fight into space. That's why the U.S. has development programs in directed energy and hit-to-kill mechanisms."
— Gen Joseph Ashy, of the US Space Command
Unfortunately, the A&E Truth people, who I followed and believed this past 17 years, has a problem: Dr. Judy Wood. Her meticulous evidence, which took her something like seven years to document and analyze, refutes their evidence - strongly. And they don't want to acknowledge it, and have simply obfuscated and smeared her assertions. This is not how the real truth behaves. Wood does not claim anything regarding the Who, or the Why of 9/11 - only the What Happened. And A&E actively discourages people from looking at what she has uncovered. It was hard for me, but I have come to understand A&E as a dialectic: a lie with grains of truth, a prepared rabbit hole to catch those of us seeking truth, only to veer us off in a slightly-safer direction. If we truly desire the truth, we will be willing to look at all the evidence, and to consider it thoughtfully. Dr. Wood has no agenda other than empirical evidence and data collection. As in all crime scenes, first you have to establish What happened, before you can determine How, or Who.
https://www.youtube.com/user/911EmpiricalEvidence
https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/
https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
My problem with the 9/11 false flag is that just about everyone who can think knows by now that it was a false flag. How much difference does "people being informed" make?
The resulting (un)Patriot(ic) Act, completely unsubstantiated, is still in effect...
For fun, look at the cartoon on top of this article:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/teacher-who-is-causing-energy-shortages