I spoke with Mike Adams of Brighteon News a couple of weeks ago. Here is the recording — we got into some interesting territory, from the California fires to the digital issue to the meaning of life.
THE VIRUS IS MY GOD. The “virus” is claimed to have invaded a town in the old west and soon worshiped as a new idol among the populace: Watch the music video here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-virus-is-my-god.
GREAT interview. Excellent job on your part, Eric, leading Mike through the world of dioxin. And then, particularly superb job educating him about RFK Jr (who has now been approved by the Senate, after throwing his supposed principles under the bus) and the fact that"viruses," both the SARS-CoV-2 as well as others, have never been physically demonstrated to exist, while remaining totally respectful of his perspectives.
The one missed opportunity was his assertion that bacteria, protozoa, fungi.... have been proven to exist, which is true, but does not prove that any of them are pathogens. None of them have been proven to be so in ways which satisfy Koch's and Rivers' Postulates. But hey, no need to be greedy. :-)
I think we need more discussion about bacteria. Some of them produce deadly toxins. Nobody would voluntarily eat shit or rotten food. It's important to clean out injuries and to sterilize surgical instruments before using them.
This is a different issue from contagion.
To make any honest assertion about bacteria — which are known to exist — we need to go through each of them one by one and consider its properties including acute toxicity. There is a reason that rotten food stinks and there is a reason that it makes most people sick.
True, i was strictly talking about contagion. I believe that's what the term "pathogen" is about. Many substances which are excellent nutrients can turn into toxins under certain circumstances, such as excessive levels or deterioration due to age, e.g. rotten food. I did not remotely intend to say that bacteria,etc are ALWAYS harmless and benign.
<< A pathogen is a microorganism or organism that can cause disease in a host. Pathogens can be viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites, worms, or prions. >>
"Pathogen" at its linguistic root is what causes pain, usually held to be a contagion. However, it can also be parasitic or opportunistic (such as related to an untended injury).
Whether and how one of these things is toxic needs to be studied, and I do not dismiss the chemicals secreted by a bacteria as "not being about the bacteria" which itself may not be toxic. However, all of this is consistent with terrain theory. To break the skin or poison the tissue or blood is a terrain issue.
Again, my point was that Mike said (or implied?) that bacteria had been shown to be responsible for contagion, the transmission of disease, and there is zero proof for that. That's all.
Mike Adams cannot be right that there were 80 mph winds in LA. More like 25 mph. Hurricane force winds from the desert? Really? This is ridiculous. We lived in CA for 23 years. I've never heard of Santa Ana winds in winter, never heard of wild fires in winter and never heard of hurricane force Santa Ana winds. Just doesn't happen. So much about those fires stinks to high heaven.
The winds were easily gusting to 80. I was getting real time reports from area residents on a West Coast (primarily California) weather blog. I live in the Bay Area. Yeah, wild fires in January, because SoCal had picked up practically ZERO rain by mid January, vs rains starting in November. Just like predicted due to rising global average temps. NorCal has been getting wild fires later and later in the year too. https://weatherwest.com/
I must respectfully disagree. Global ave temps are not rising. There were no hurricane force winds. The weather websites were saying 25 mph at the time, changed it later. Do know these CA residents, can you vouch for their reliability, do they even know what it's like to be in 80 mph winds? Were roofs blowing off?
Btw, are you aware multiple arsonists were caught in the act? These were not natural fires.
Yes i can vouch for their reliability as to what they were experiencing. Here was the Weather West blog entry at the time of the fire, the comments section (huge) has personal accounts bu people i've been communicating with for over 10 years. The worst winds were in the wild high country, not too many roofs around, but they were plenty bad even at lower levels, way more than 25. The blog's author by the way lived in LA for quite a few years, was a post doc at UCLA. (climate science).
Every single climate scientist is suspect? So in other words, no climate scientist should be trusted. Should any scientist? In any field? Should we believe in flat earth?
In general, science has been corrupted by govt money since ww2. There has always been a struggle between the "Old Guard" and the "Upstarts" which is not all bad. However, once govt money became dominant, the politics became fierce, and genuine inquiry took a back seat to the detriment innovation. Certain disciplines are worse than others. Climate "science" has been thoroughly politicized. Most of the climate "scientists" have been bought off to boost the ridiculous global warming nonsense. Are you aware of the Climate-gate Scandal?
There are reasons for the lack of important discoveries over the last decades. Scratch the surface of the dogmas of just about any area of science and you will find error upon error piled up, and paid off "scientists" jealously protecting their jobs through politics and deceit. I'm not the only one who has noticed this. Maybe you should look into this corruption yourself.
The short answer is" "Yes, every 'climate scientist' is suspect." Ya know, they used to be called physicists.
I take exception to your flat earth insult. For the record, I think flat earth is an op to make those who question modern dogma look kooky.
THE VIRUS IS MY GOD. The “virus” is claimed to have invaded a town in the old west and soon worshiped as a new idol among the populace: Watch the music video here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-virus-is-my-god.
GREAT interview. Excellent job on your part, Eric, leading Mike through the world of dioxin. And then, particularly superb job educating him about RFK Jr (who has now been approved by the Senate, after throwing his supposed principles under the bus) and the fact that"viruses," both the SARS-CoV-2 as well as others, have never been physically demonstrated to exist, while remaining totally respectful of his perspectives.
The one missed opportunity was his assertion that bacteria, protozoa, fungi.... have been proven to exist, which is true, but does not prove that any of them are pathogens. None of them have been proven to be so in ways which satisfy Koch's and Rivers' Postulates. But hey, no need to be greedy. :-)
I think we need more discussion about bacteria. Some of them produce deadly toxins. Nobody would voluntarily eat shit or rotten food. It's important to clean out injuries and to sterilize surgical instruments before using them.
This is a different issue from contagion.
To make any honest assertion about bacteria — which are known to exist — we need to go through each of them one by one and consider its properties including acute toxicity. There is a reason that rotten food stinks and there is a reason that it makes most people sick.
True, i was strictly talking about contagion. I believe that's what the term "pathogen" is about. Many substances which are excellent nutrients can turn into toxins under certain circumstances, such as excessive levels or deterioration due to age, e.g. rotten food. I did not remotely intend to say that bacteria,etc are ALWAYS harmless and benign.
<< A pathogen is a microorganism or organism that can cause disease in a host. Pathogens can be viruses, bacteria, fungi, parasites, worms, or prions. >>
"Pathogen" at its linguistic root is what causes pain, usually held to be a contagion. However, it can also be parasitic or opportunistic (such as related to an untended injury).
Whether and how one of these things is toxic needs to be studied, and I do not dismiss the chemicals secreted by a bacteria as "not being about the bacteria" which itself may not be toxic. However, all of this is consistent with terrain theory. To break the skin or poison the tissue or blood is a terrain issue.
Yep.
Again, my point was that Mike said (or implied?) that bacteria had been shown to be responsible for contagion, the transmission of disease, and there is zero proof for that. That's all.
Mike Adams cannot be right that there were 80 mph winds in LA. More like 25 mph. Hurricane force winds from the desert? Really? This is ridiculous. We lived in CA for 23 years. I've never heard of Santa Ana winds in winter, never heard of wild fires in winter and never heard of hurricane force Santa Ana winds. Just doesn't happen. So much about those fires stinks to high heaven.
that's a lot of wind. i guess it seems faster than it really is, or a gross exaggeration based on a lack of data.
The winds were easily gusting to 80. I was getting real time reports from area residents on a West Coast (primarily California) weather blog. I live in the Bay Area. Yeah, wild fires in January, because SoCal had picked up practically ZERO rain by mid January, vs rains starting in November. Just like predicted due to rising global average temps. NorCal has been getting wild fires later and later in the year too. https://weatherwest.com/
I must respectfully disagree. Global ave temps are not rising. There were no hurricane force winds. The weather websites were saying 25 mph at the time, changed it later. Do know these CA residents, can you vouch for their reliability, do they even know what it's like to be in 80 mph winds? Were roofs blowing off?
Btw, are you aware multiple arsonists were caught in the act? These were not natural fires.
Yes i can vouch for their reliability as to what they were experiencing. Here was the Weather West blog entry at the time of the fire, the comments section (huge) has personal accounts bu people i've been communicating with for over 10 years. The worst winds were in the wild high country, not too many roofs around, but they were plenty bad even at lower levels, way more than 25. The blog's author by the way lived in LA for quite a few years, was a post doc at UCLA. (climate science).
https://weatherwest.com/archives/43171
This article quotes the blogger Daniel Swain.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/explosive-palisades-fire-fueled-by-santa-ana-winds/
"...was a post doc at UCLA. (climate science)." You just blew any credibility.
Every single climate scientist is suspect? So in other words, no climate scientist should be trusted. Should any scientist? In any field? Should we believe in flat earth?
In general, science has been corrupted by govt money since ww2. There has always been a struggle between the "Old Guard" and the "Upstarts" which is not all bad. However, once govt money became dominant, the politics became fierce, and genuine inquiry took a back seat to the detriment innovation. Certain disciplines are worse than others. Climate "science" has been thoroughly politicized. Most of the climate "scientists" have been bought off to boost the ridiculous global warming nonsense. Are you aware of the Climate-gate Scandal?
There are reasons for the lack of important discoveries over the last decades. Scratch the surface of the dogmas of just about any area of science and you will find error upon error piled up, and paid off "scientists" jealously protecting their jobs through politics and deceit. I'm not the only one who has noticed this. Maybe you should look into this corruption yourself.
The short answer is" "Yes, every 'climate scientist' is suspect." Ya know, they used to be called physicists.
I take exception to your flat earth insult. For the record, I think flat earth is an op to make those who question modern dogma look kooky.
what a treat to hear my favorite smart guys who know real shit.
like I said to the EPA, send the ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS to help. We have no plumbers and builders that have the knowledge. It's scary.