Maybe they just landed outside of the giant crater we live on….of the same planet we call “moon” but ain't no moon. Maybe Nibiru is us.
There is no moon folks!! What you see up there is the reflection of your own planet and you are on it.
That would explain how anal they are about Antartica, and “Space" because these two off limits areas seem to bring all the 195 nations together.
And is it Space or "outer space”…literally out of your own space.
Too many inconsistency in the moon landing. If it happened then it was down here not up there cuz…..up there is HERE.
Other curious factor is how the moon surface has been mapped in details, down to name of mountains. And why do we keep seen only one side? Oh yes do not explain it to me. It is because it is a reflection…..of your own planet.
The asteroid belt issues would be how the camera film made it through it out and back. Unless it was locked in the very heavy lead covered bag. Do you recall how you had to remove film out of an old camera when you went thru airport security xray? Now we are talking 1965-1970 technology here. Not to mention the CRISPINESS of the moon photos including the lighting. Studio quality.
The audio phone calls are the most telling in my opinion. Lets figure this out…..it is 2024 and wireless broadcasting even using satellites is still bad. Delays, lagging on sound (did I say it is 2024?) and with the 5G (another lie) we still have dead spots inside home!!!!!! But yet in 1969 we get that ready sound feed from the moon to earth?
Well, the astronaut explaining that "unfortunately we lost the technology" was one. Or the other twit explaining how "first we have to figure out how to cross the Van Allen belts", without even blinking. Then NASA "erased the tapes", which is just Bozzo stuff. When you put everything together, plus one's modern intuition, it becomes apparent that they probably never went. And hey, if making movies already makes people believe everything, why even bother? (Did I understood the phrase "points of contact" wrong and you meant something else? - English not my native language).
Mm hmm. The photos are a big problem — ordinary Hasselblads and ordinary film, which would come unraveled in a vacuum. You need atmospheric pressure for the layers of emulsion to stay together and the cameras we not pressurized nor were they in pressure vessels...
Absolutely. Well, of course it's a gigantic topic, but those were the final nails for me. The photos could be argued, no? I've messed with photography a lot back in 1756 (been around many pro photographers) and I've seen unconvincing arguments with the photos. Lack of depth of field and such, but things like what you mentioned, yes, they are a big problem. The Hasselblad guy also can't explain the hot spot in one of them, etc.
There's an interview with a photographer - I can't remember or find it now - where the guy shows the pics to a number of photographers and all say it's studio, but there's so much stuff on this, including the weird "Dark Moon" mockumentary which makes the Russian doll look like Steve Kirsch. It's all so weird.
So get this. My close friend's oldest son was on the household staff of Evelyn de Rothschild, who died in 2022. I cannot tell you his role; he was a ranking member of the staff, and had direct access to the Monsieur. One night Evelyn was wearing a NASA baseball cap, and the person asked him how he felt about NASA. Evelyn was old -- he was 91, nothing or lose or gain. He said, "You know, we never went to the Moon."
Shit, sir, that's quite a bomb. Where did Evelyn live? Impersonating a New Yorker, I'd say hey, if Evelyn said it, you can take it to the bank! (Well, maybe a 1957 New Yorker). Did you ever do a program on the subject?
LOL, is it just me or does this feel like groundhog day got hit with a timeline jolt and skipped back to 4/1. No matter - it's funny as hell & I experienced an involuntary instance of 'suddenly audible hilarity' at the Kirsch jab
The idea that people have not been to the moon is obviously ridiculous, given that in the 1950's mainstream newspapers carried articles matter-of-factly stating that the age of jet/ rockets was near an end and that anti-grav technology was just around the corner. All the major aerospace corporations were openly pursuing anti-grav technology at the time and the general feeling was that they had essentially nailed it.
Then at the start of the 60's the entire subject fell off the radar never to be spoken of again. Then - almost as if to satisfy an expectant public, salivating at the prospect of a Jetsons world - we were given the amazing Apollo program which was super duper 1940's rocket technology ........ and anybody who said otherwise was burnt to a crisp during a routine test, run over by a train at a level crossing, or flattened by a falling grand piano.
After Apollo we got the Shuttle (worse than Saturn V) and then Elon's rockets which are basically 1940's rockets with integral coffee cup holders, power steering and wifi.
Meanwhile all over the world people started seeing silent black triangles and other silent craft hovering improbably or accelerating at 'impossible' speeds. The Belgian military even chased one of them in the 1990's with F16's and they were clocked on radar pulling 30G 'right angle' turns which obviously no ordinary craft can do.
The idea that space flight (ie propulsion/ energy tech) is a complete shambles is presented to us as a conspiracy theory... but it is in fact more likely to be a cover up of the REAL space program which is in the hands of the big aerospace corporations (MIC) and is basically creating a 'breakaway civilisation' who have detached themselves from the artificial scarcity paradigms of oil and conventional engines/ rockets.
If there is a 'breakaway civilisation' we might expect them to suddenly lose interest in the technological progress of the masses, because they no longer need the general population to serve as the engine of progress and production. If this were the case they might try to fob us off with windmills (abandoned 200 years ago), electric cars (abandoned 100 years ago) and other nonsense, to send us back to a new age of feudalism, while they fuck off on jaunts around the solar system (and beyond?). They might also trick us into injecting poison for the purposes of depopulation, seeing as how we are no longer necessary or useful - except perhaps as transhumanist lab rats.
Anyone who says 'We haven't been to the moon" is therefore falling for the counter narrative. The truth is we (they) are probably on the moon right now - and they didn't get there in 1940's rocket technology, that's for sure.
It's all about looking at the wider context (as you yourself have mentioned in your podcasts).
What's the first thing that would happen if anti grav/ free energy technology was developed? This would be the worst possible news because it would end the scarcity paradigm and liberate 7 billion people from dependency on oil and (effectively) paying utility bills. Can't have that! It would create a Jetsons' world (as everyone was reasonably expecting to happen) .... but that is the worst possible outcome if you are part of the technocratic (parasitic) class. It had to be stopped. Instead we got 'climate change' and 'viruses'.
Anyway, on the subject of context, you might enjoy this 'big picture' take on 'covid' and the cult of digital........
Check the Steve Kirsch v Andy Kaufman video on Rumble or somewhere. Maybe another reader will post the link. But you should have a few glasses of wine before you watch. Also I am not a doctor but I think Kirsch needs to smoke some of those moonrocks.
For fuck's sake, I watched it last night and kept walking around like my mom used to do when watching horror movies. "Sit down!" - I used to say, and she replied, "Me pone muy nerviosa!"
Wow! No kidding, I follow Andy closely so either I missed this one OR it traumatized me and I've blocked it out of my brain 😂 ill check it out. Thanks!
Kirsch has zero intellectual integrity and is emotionally all over the place. Andy, experienced as a psychiatrist in the prison system, holds a calm, steady place of basic reality. I'm not sure I could watch the whole thing; I have not. At least Andy is a friendly soul and nice to look at. Kirsch is neither.
VSRF Live #131: The Great Virus Debate! An Interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D., Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, 6/13/24. an hour an 52 minutes.
Was this recent? Is that the date it happened 6/13/24? If so, idk how I missed it. I hope this doesn't piss me off like some of the others Andy has done with virus-pushers, like Judy Mikovitz and Reimer Feullmich. Both those interviews were so difficult to get through lol
Andy perfectly maintains his composure, while Kirsch totally loses his, spouts utter nonsense, melts down.
The interview together with Judy in Feb '21 wasn't good. They were to meet again, that time he maintained well while Mikovits melted down. And Do you mean the Corona Investigative Committee re Fuellmich? (Fuel Me? Fool Me?) That was a disgrace om the part of Fuellmich and Wodarg the attack dog. Andy kept his compusure. Fuellmich admitted this late last year.
Maybe they just launched a shoe up there to make the footprint. There goes your independent variable. 🥹
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1178954846448855
oh man...this is excellent...thank you
https://www.facebook.com/reel/985849256230902
Brilliant!
Maybe they just landed outside of the giant crater we live on….of the same planet we call “moon” but ain't no moon. Maybe Nibiru is us.
There is no moon folks!! What you see up there is the reflection of your own planet and you are on it.
That would explain how anal they are about Antartica, and “Space" because these two off limits areas seem to bring all the 195 nations together.
And is it Space or "outer space”…literally out of your own space.
Too many inconsistency in the moon landing. If it happened then it was down here not up there cuz…..up there is HERE.
Other curious factor is how the moon surface has been mapped in details, down to name of mountains. And why do we keep seen only one side? Oh yes do not explain it to me. It is because it is a reflection…..of your own planet.
The asteroid belt issues would be how the camera film made it through it out and back. Unless it was locked in the very heavy lead covered bag. Do you recall how you had to remove film out of an old camera when you went thru airport security xray? Now we are talking 1965-1970 technology here. Not to mention the CRISPINESS of the moon photos including the lighting. Studio quality.
The audio phone calls are the most telling in my opinion. Lets figure this out…..it is 2024 and wireless broadcasting even using satellites is still bad. Delays, lagging on sound (did I say it is 2024?) and with the 5G (another lie) we still have dead spots inside home!!!!!! But yet in 1969 we get that ready sound feed from the moon to earth?
……nahhhh….
Do you know who finally convinced me moon landings are impossible? Fucking NASA.
Do tell. I have my points of contact as well...what was yours?
Well, the astronaut explaining that "unfortunately we lost the technology" was one. Or the other twit explaining how "first we have to figure out how to cross the Van Allen belts", without even blinking. Then NASA "erased the tapes", which is just Bozzo stuff. When you put everything together, plus one's modern intuition, it becomes apparent that they probably never went. And hey, if making movies already makes people believe everything, why even bother? (Did I understood the phrase "points of contact" wrong and you meant something else? - English not my native language).
Mm hmm. The photos are a big problem — ordinary Hasselblads and ordinary film, which would come unraveled in a vacuum. You need atmospheric pressure for the layers of emulsion to stay together and the cameras we not pressurized nor were they in pressure vessels...
Absolutely. Well, of course it's a gigantic topic, but those were the final nails for me. The photos could be argued, no? I've messed with photography a lot back in 1756 (been around many pro photographers) and I've seen unconvincing arguments with the photos. Lack of depth of field and such, but things like what you mentioned, yes, they are a big problem. The Hasselblad guy also can't explain the hot spot in one of them, etc.
There's an interview with a photographer - I can't remember or find it now - where the guy shows the pics to a number of photographers and all say it's studio, but there's so much stuff on this, including the weird "Dark Moon" mockumentary which makes the Russian doll look like Steve Kirsch. It's all so weird.
Do you have any pictures of Ben Franklin?
So get this. My close friend's oldest son was on the household staff of Evelyn de Rothschild, who died in 2022. I cannot tell you his role; he was a ranking member of the staff, and had direct access to the Monsieur. One night Evelyn was wearing a NASA baseball cap, and the person asked him how he felt about NASA. Evelyn was old -- he was 91, nothing or lose or gain. He said, "You know, we never went to the Moon."
Shit, sir, that's quite a bomb. Where did Evelyn live? Impersonating a New Yorker, I'd say hey, if Evelyn said it, you can take it to the bank! (Well, maybe a 1957 New Yorker). Did you ever do a program on the subject?
I’ll risk going through the Van Halen belt anytime as long as it’s blasting “Dance the Night Away”.
LOL, is it just me or does this feel like groundhog day got hit with a timeline jolt and skipped back to 4/1. No matter - it's funny as hell & I experienced an involuntary instance of 'suddenly audible hilarity' at the Kirsch jab
Van Halen belt!!!!😁😆🤣😂 I lost it on that one! You’ve outdone even yourself with this satire, Eric. Good one! 👍
The idea that people have not been to the moon is obviously ridiculous, given that in the 1950's mainstream newspapers carried articles matter-of-factly stating that the age of jet/ rockets was near an end and that anti-grav technology was just around the corner. All the major aerospace corporations were openly pursuing anti-grav technology at the time and the general feeling was that they had essentially nailed it.
Then at the start of the 60's the entire subject fell off the radar never to be spoken of again. Then - almost as if to satisfy an expectant public, salivating at the prospect of a Jetsons world - we were given the amazing Apollo program which was super duper 1940's rocket technology ........ and anybody who said otherwise was burnt to a crisp during a routine test, run over by a train at a level crossing, or flattened by a falling grand piano.
After Apollo we got the Shuttle (worse than Saturn V) and then Elon's rockets which are basically 1940's rockets with integral coffee cup holders, power steering and wifi.
Meanwhile all over the world people started seeing silent black triangles and other silent craft hovering improbably or accelerating at 'impossible' speeds. The Belgian military even chased one of them in the 1990's with F16's and they were clocked on radar pulling 30G 'right angle' turns which obviously no ordinary craft can do.
The idea that space flight (ie propulsion/ energy tech) is a complete shambles is presented to us as a conspiracy theory... but it is in fact more likely to be a cover up of the REAL space program which is in the hands of the big aerospace corporations (MIC) and is basically creating a 'breakaway civilisation' who have detached themselves from the artificial scarcity paradigms of oil and conventional engines/ rockets.
If there is a 'breakaway civilisation' we might expect them to suddenly lose interest in the technological progress of the masses, because they no longer need the general population to serve as the engine of progress and production. If this were the case they might try to fob us off with windmills (abandoned 200 years ago), electric cars (abandoned 100 years ago) and other nonsense, to send us back to a new age of feudalism, while they fuck off on jaunts around the solar system (and beyond?). They might also trick us into injecting poison for the purposes of depopulation, seeing as how we are no longer necessary or useful - except perhaps as transhumanist lab rats.
Anyone who says 'We haven't been to the moon" is therefore falling for the counter narrative. The truth is we (they) are probably on the moon right now - and they didn't get there in 1940's rocket technology, that's for sure.
Now this is an interesting twist or two.
It's all about looking at the wider context (as you yourself have mentioned in your podcasts).
What's the first thing that would happen if anti grav/ free energy technology was developed? This would be the worst possible news because it would end the scarcity paradigm and liberate 7 billion people from dependency on oil and (effectively) paying utility bills. Can't have that! It would create a Jetsons' world (as everyone was reasonably expecting to happen) .... but that is the worst possible outcome if you are part of the technocratic (parasitic) class. It had to be stopped. Instead we got 'climate change' and 'viruses'.
Anyway, on the subject of context, you might enjoy this 'big picture' take on 'covid' and the cult of digital........
Escape From The Planet of the Apps.
https://odysee.com/@CoronaStudies:3/CS-EFPOTA:9
https://i.postimg.cc/0yyZ1KP7/image.jpg
Lol!
It’s obvious the entire moon landing was a psyop by General Foods to sell more Tang.
Lol ! Don't forget the Space Food Sticks !
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/space-food-sticks--15129348718098678/
but now that I think of it, maybe they were only after the "Moon-Tang"
;)
the whole thing was a photo shoot for MTV -- they got their Moon Tang!
Gotta make sure the shoe print matches shoes used in the US military in 1969. 🤣
Good one, Eric!!
"Why is it that Steve Kirsch required psychiatric intervention?" <---- Wait, did this really happen? 😂
This entire article is a fucking Rollercoaster. What is happening!?!? 😂😂
Check the Steve Kirsch v Andy Kaufman video on Rumble or somewhere. Maybe another reader will post the link. But you should have a few glasses of wine before you watch. Also I am not a doctor but I think Kirsch needs to smoke some of those moonrocks.
I did listen to it and had my therapist on speed dial just in case.
For fuck's sake, I watched it last night and kept walking around like my mom used to do when watching horror movies. "Sit down!" - I used to say, and she replied, "Me pone muy nerviosa!"
Wow! No kidding, I follow Andy closely so either I missed this one OR it traumatized me and I've blocked it out of my brain 😂 ill check it out. Thanks!
Kirsch has zero intellectual integrity and is emotionally all over the place. Andy, experienced as a psychiatrist in the prison system, holds a calm, steady place of basic reality. I'm not sure I could watch the whole thing; I have not. At least Andy is a friendly soul and nice to look at. Kirsch is neither.
Oh too funny and too true. That ‘conversation’ was a doozy.
Here's the link Eric mentions below.
https://rumble.com/v516uno-vsrf-live-131-the-great-virus-debate-an-interview-with-dr.-andrew-kaufman-m.html
VSRF Live #131: The Great Virus Debate! An Interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D., Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, 6/13/24. an hour an 52 minutes.
Wow you guys are fast! Thanks so much.
Was this recent? Is that the date it happened 6/13/24? If so, idk how I missed it. I hope this doesn't piss me off like some of the others Andy has done with virus-pushers, like Judy Mikovitz and Reimer Feullmich. Both those interviews were so difficult to get through lol
Andy perfectly maintains his composure, while Kirsch totally loses his, spouts utter nonsense, melts down.
The interview together with Judy in Feb '21 wasn't good. They were to meet again, that time he maintained well while Mikovits melted down. And Do you mean the Corona Investigative Committee re Fuellmich? (Fuel Me? Fool Me?) That was a disgrace om the part of Fuellmich and Wodarg the attack dog. Andy kept his compusure. Fuellmich admitted this late last year.
Tang you very much. Period.