On the eve of the Jupiter-Uranus conjunction — the astrology, plus I respond to Charles Eisenstein and Robert F. Kennedy, plus Donald Trump trial astrology, and the mystery of missing sex in marriage.
Pausing after Lifeboy. Wow, you totally took apart Eisenstein and the man he was standing in for, Bobby Junior. Good going, constantly reminding the audience that the WHO draws its power from the virus claim. Thus, this claim is not some mundane debating point and meaningless detail which so many "freedom" people would have us believe. It is the core of the 4IR operation to impose total control upon the world's population.
Charles Eisenstein (CE) segment 1. "Lets hold hands and unite." As if Reps and Demos are two opposing sides, rather than 2 faces of the same corporate party. Meanwhile Junior is basically, with his book and his speeches, pushing the same thing Fauci was 4 years ago, except with a conspiracy angle. That's *their* unity.
CE segment 2. "Things are out of control, as if some force outside us is in control." Yep, the force which locked down 4.4 billion people. Not a word from CE about the pain this caused. Not out of control at all, but a force carefully sculpted into shape, and we were drawn into it. This is happning now, with Avian Flu scares and millions of animals slaughtered, hype about transmission to humans, all done via PCR testing. Nothing about the resistance back in 2019 to the repeal of religious exemption. Junior is NOT an anti-waccer, no mention of total moratorium on ALL shots. Repeated refusal to grapple with the serious issues.
CE segment 3. He waxes on about what nice guys these people, the president of a jabs manufacture, the CEO of an oil company, a hedge fund manager, are, so reasonable, so charming. AS if they are not paid to act that part! "The Banality of Evil" (Hannah Arendt) They do what they do, get things done, by being charming. And CE reduces it to a matter of mRNA shots bad, "live virus" good. Live what?
This force which CE cannot name has names, such as DIGITAL, Web3.0, 4IR.. "COVID" is entirely a product of AI. And who does Junior select for a running mate? Nicole Shanahan, wealthy via close association with Google co-founder Sergey Brin, developer of the robot spying par excellence, She's practically the Queen of 4IR. Connections to the Stanford Computational Policy lab, 4IR and social impact investing central. Her own Bia-Echo foundation funded by Google.
And then, Eric with CE directly.
Eisenstein
00:56 to 1:33 :"lab leak is not a conspiracy theory, i tend to believe that theory” [So this makes it not a conspiracy theory?]
Eric then bringsup AI generation of MN908947
Him, 1:57. "That conspiracy would have to be so wide, there are a lot of dissident scientists who oppose parts of the official narrative yet accept the reality of a virus, who discuss the genome and the parts of it which have been modified" [How do they know THAT is the genome? They were TOLD it is]
At 2:50, Eric brings up Christine and her collection of responses to FOIA requests. He brings up Jessica Rose as an expert 3:18, How is her name relevant to the Massey point? He’s DODGING the matter.
Eric asks if it isn’t amazing that no government entity can provide a paper proving the existence of the virus [via physical isolation and purification] He responds (3:43) “I do not have the knowledge to produce such a paper.” As if Eric asked him to produce such a paper, rather than comment on the responses Christine has amassed. DODGY.
And again, the claim that there are viruses among us is precisely what gives the WHO its power. Those like Meryl Nass who fire numerous emails about opposing the WHO while continuing to uphold the virus narrative are utterly deceptive, they are doing the key work for the WHO and the other manifestations of the operation to impose Digital/4IR on humanity.
UTTERLY SUPERB WORK, Eric!!!
Musical note. Hard to not notice the similarity between Lifeboy and New Potato Caboose on Anthem of the Sun. I liked If I Could more than the "kids dancing on my lawn."
Finished. Regarding the third segment: Waiting for the Juno shoe to drop.
The last segment was fascinating. The sexless committed monogamous marriage is such a perfect example of digital disembodiment. You indeed mentioned that as a key explanatory factor. You also brought up the pervasive use pf antidepressants, and the ubiquitous presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Absolutely! And, the utterly deranged nature of many present day narratives which have totally taken over what used to be a very valid feminist movement, when its aim was to remove unequal treatment from social practices.
But you surprisingly left out a big one, which you have discussed many times. There is a current 30 years low in sexuality? What happened some 30 years ago? Remember the continued aftereffects of AIDS, primarily caused by reports of numerous people determined to have AIDS on the basis of.....testing? The big chill which this brought to general sexual practice never really went away. It has only been compounded by new health concerns being raised over the years, culminating with the "Pandemic," causing Will and Rose to avoid sex for over a year. The doors of perception have been replaced by walls of belief, whose refrain is...."Don't touch me."
Throw in a general sense of social fragmentation, with everything being broken due to the rapid wearing of the social glue. It's everyone against everyone else. How can this in any way encourage any desire to have intimacy with anyone new, even the hot sushi server? (Maybe i should frequent sushi bars. :-) ) Many adults say they've had no sex for a year? Try it for 30 years and tell me how it feels. This is six parts (at least) monster which is going a long way toward undermining what is left of our humanity.
I liked the suggestions you offered couples who wish to re-ignite intimacy. And, excellent advice, stay human in the face of digital encroachment by bringing love and other emotions into all our interactions.
Pausing after Lifeboy. Wow, you totally took apart Eisenstein and the man he was standing in for, Bobby Junior. Good going, constantly reminding the audience that the WHO draws its power from the virus claim. Thus, this claim is not some mundane debating point and meaningless detail which so many "freedom" people would have us believe. It is the core of the 4IR operation to impose total control upon the world's population.
Charles Eisenstein (CE) segment 1. "Lets hold hands and unite." As if Reps and Demos are two opposing sides, rather than 2 faces of the same corporate party. Meanwhile Junior is basically, with his book and his speeches, pushing the same thing Fauci was 4 years ago, except with a conspiracy angle. That's *their* unity.
CE segment 2. "Things are out of control, as if some force outside us is in control." Yep, the force which locked down 4.4 billion people. Not a word from CE about the pain this caused. Not out of control at all, but a force carefully sculpted into shape, and we were drawn into it. This is happning now, with Avian Flu scares and millions of animals slaughtered, hype about transmission to humans, all done via PCR testing. Nothing about the resistance back in 2019 to the repeal of religious exemption. Junior is NOT an anti-waccer, no mention of total moratorium on ALL shots. Repeated refusal to grapple with the serious issues.
CE segment 3. He waxes on about what nice guys these people, the president of a jabs manufacture, the CEO of an oil company, a hedge fund manager, are, so reasonable, so charming. AS if they are not paid to act that part! "The Banality of Evil" (Hannah Arendt) They do what they do, get things done, by being charming. And CE reduces it to a matter of mRNA shots bad, "live virus" good. Live what?
This force which CE cannot name has names, such as DIGITAL, Web3.0, 4IR.. "COVID" is entirely a product of AI. And who does Junior select for a running mate? Nicole Shanahan, wealthy via close association with Google co-founder Sergey Brin, developer of the robot spying par excellence, She's practically the Queen of 4IR. Connections to the Stanford Computational Policy lab, 4IR and social impact investing central. Her own Bia-Echo foundation funded by Google.
And then, Eric with CE directly.
Eisenstein
00:56 to 1:33 :"lab leak is not a conspiracy theory, i tend to believe that theory” [So this makes it not a conspiracy theory?]
Eric then bringsup AI generation of MN908947
Him, 1:57. "That conspiracy would have to be so wide, there are a lot of dissident scientists who oppose parts of the official narrative yet accept the reality of a virus, who discuss the genome and the parts of it which have been modified" [How do they know THAT is the genome? They were TOLD it is]
At 2:50, Eric brings up Christine and her collection of responses to FOIA requests. He brings up Jessica Rose as an expert 3:18, How is her name relevant to the Massey point? He’s DODGING the matter.
Eric asks if it isn’t amazing that no government entity can provide a paper proving the existence of the virus [via physical isolation and purification] He responds (3:43) “I do not have the knowledge to produce such a paper.” As if Eric asked him to produce such a paper, rather than comment on the responses Christine has amassed. DODGY.
And again, the claim that there are viruses among us is precisely what gives the WHO its power. Those like Meryl Nass who fire numerous emails about opposing the WHO while continuing to uphold the virus narrative are utterly deceptive, they are doing the key work for the WHO and the other manifestations of the operation to impose Digital/4IR on humanity.
UTTERLY SUPERB WORK, Eric!!!
Musical note. Hard to not notice the similarity between Lifeboy and New Potato Caboose on Anthem of the Sun. I liked If I Could more than the "kids dancing on my lawn."
You brought back the old music!! I was really missing it!
Finished. Regarding the third segment: Waiting for the Juno shoe to drop.
The last segment was fascinating. The sexless committed monogamous marriage is such a perfect example of digital disembodiment. You indeed mentioned that as a key explanatory factor. You also brought up the pervasive use pf antidepressants, and the ubiquitous presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Absolutely! And, the utterly deranged nature of many present day narratives which have totally taken over what used to be a very valid feminist movement, when its aim was to remove unequal treatment from social practices.
But you surprisingly left out a big one, which you have discussed many times. There is a current 30 years low in sexuality? What happened some 30 years ago? Remember the continued aftereffects of AIDS, primarily caused by reports of numerous people determined to have AIDS on the basis of.....testing? The big chill which this brought to general sexual practice never really went away. It has only been compounded by new health concerns being raised over the years, culminating with the "Pandemic," causing Will and Rose to avoid sex for over a year. The doors of perception have been replaced by walls of belief, whose refrain is...."Don't touch me."
Throw in a general sense of social fragmentation, with everything being broken due to the rapid wearing of the social glue. It's everyone against everyone else. How can this in any way encourage any desire to have intimacy with anyone new, even the hot sushi server? (Maybe i should frequent sushi bars. :-) ) Many adults say they've had no sex for a year? Try it for 30 years and tell me how it feels. This is six parts (at least) monster which is going a long way toward undermining what is left of our humanity.
I liked the suggestions you offered couples who wish to re-ignite intimacy. And, excellent advice, stay human in the face of digital encroachment by bringing love and other emotions into all our interactions.