OK- must be something local to you- I have all of the blurb to show that both America and the UK were in this together and it is a military operation, well DOD and DARPA against all of us.
OK- must be something local to you- I have all of the blurb to show that both America and the UK were in this together and it is a military operation, well DOD and DARPA against all of us.
Asking again. Show us evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been proven to exist. Military operation with a non-existent "virus"? Good one. Just like people who claim they saw a virus move by looking through an electron microscope. :-)
The military operation, and I would point to the extensive work by Katherine Watt regarding lots of evidence, is not about the virus existence or lab leak.
According to Watt it's about the weaponization of the jab, which she claims is not a therapeutic, is under military command from R&D to administration, and as such it doesn't require any of the pharma test regulations.
There is no pathogenic virus as described by those who claim otherwise.
What is problematic is that those who see only the economic reset (CAF) - motive - as all important, cannot allow for the biologic argument that no pathogenic virus has ever been proven to exist; and thus the pandemic is null and void.
Why can't CAF simply state, I've heard that there is a debate within science that the germ theory has never been proven, but I focus on the financial collapse that we're confronted with, and simply leave it at that.
None of the "no virus" people that I'm familiar with disputes the elite obsession with control of planet Earth.
The jab (all brands of it) is obviously not therapeutic, but it cannot be a bioweapon. That requires the use of a biological entity as the mode of transmission. Injection of something is no different than drinking poisonous water such as Flint, Michigan's tap water supply. It's a chemical weapon. Such things need to be made clear, not at all just semantics. Can't let Humpty Dumpty play with this term, no telling what mischief may ensure if he gets to do that.
I agree that all injections (medications in general) do not fall under "therapeutic", except that there have been certain manufacturing and testing protocols not followed by this particular one unlike the others. This injection was developed for speed and high volume quantity. (I do suspect that much of the testing (and this was a RFK, Jr. discovery) has been skipped for over 30 years.)
And I also agree that there is no "biology" used in the injections, but the injections effect (negatively) the biology of people. I would prefer to call them chemical weapons.
".. the injections effect (negatively) the biology of people."
Well, what weapon does NOT affect the biology of people in a negative way? Even bullets. spears, a punch in the nose,... would be described as bio-weapons if THAT was the definition. :-)
Perhaps we should stop putting quotes around the COVID shots (e.g., "vaccine"), since these are just variations on a common theme and don't work as advertised, and do much more harm than good.
Exactly. None have proven to work, and generally cause the body to overdrive on detox and frequently causing the very symptoms purported to mitigate.
I don't know what's really in these shots except given the positive correlation is significant as shown through some autopsies and blood tests and morbidity and death that follow injections, I think we have more than a sneaking suspicion.
In the beginning of all this warp speed following shock and awe operation in 2020, it seemed at least commonsensical that mass injections, even given the evidence we had of "normalized injections" since the 1950s (and before) would result in countless harm and death. These people were lined up in stadiums, parks, parking lots, outside markets, etc. with no questions asked (like medications, health history, etc.) and shot up.
I do think that however you define these as shots, injections, vaxxes, bio/chemical weapons, there has been a concerted planned effort to do major harm on as much of the population as would succumb. We know the mix of metals and chemicals used, alone would cause harm (no need for mRNA/spike protean). But warp speed alone is sufficient to create a cocktail of mass destruction used on millions of unhealthy bodies. Manufacturing malpractice alone would yield countless deaths.
War has the same effect. You may not know who, but you know that hundreds of thousands and frequently millions will die.
OK- must be something local to you- I have all of the blurb to show that both America and the UK were in this together and it is a military operation, well DOD and DARPA against all of us.
Asking again. Show us evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been proven to exist. Military operation with a non-existent "virus"? Good one. Just like people who claim they saw a virus move by looking through an electron microscope. :-)
The military operation, and I would point to the extensive work by Katherine Watt regarding lots of evidence, is not about the virus existence or lab leak.
According to Watt it's about the weaponization of the jab, which she claims is not a therapeutic, is under military command from R&D to administration, and as such it doesn't require any of the pharma test regulations.
There is no pathogenic virus as described by those who claim otherwise.
What is problematic is that those who see only the economic reset (CAF) - motive - as all important, cannot allow for the biologic argument that no pathogenic virus has ever been proven to exist; and thus the pandemic is null and void.
Why can't CAF simply state, I've heard that there is a debate within science that the germ theory has never been proven, but I focus on the financial collapse that we're confronted with, and simply leave it at that.
None of the "no virus" people that I'm familiar with disputes the elite obsession with control of planet Earth.
The jab (all brands of it) is obviously not therapeutic, but it cannot be a bioweapon. That requires the use of a biological entity as the mode of transmission. Injection of something is no different than drinking poisonous water such as Flint, Michigan's tap water supply. It's a chemical weapon. Such things need to be made clear, not at all just semantics. Can't let Humpty Dumpty play with this term, no telling what mischief may ensure if he gets to do that.
I agree that all injections (medications in general) do not fall under "therapeutic", except that there have been certain manufacturing and testing protocols not followed by this particular one unlike the others. This injection was developed for speed and high volume quantity. (I do suspect that much of the testing (and this was a RFK, Jr. discovery) has been skipped for over 30 years.)
And I also agree that there is no "biology" used in the injections, but the injections effect (negatively) the biology of people. I would prefer to call them chemical weapons.
".. the injections effect (negatively) the biology of people."
Well, what weapon does NOT affect the biology of people in a negative way? Even bullets. spears, a punch in the nose,... would be described as bio-weapons if THAT was the definition. :-)
And so it is.
All weapons are bio-weapons.
As are all parts of the human body, e.g. fingers, knuckles, .... Maybe not the ears. Thank you, Humpty! ЁЯШВ
Perhaps we should stop putting quotes around the COVID shots (e.g., "vaccine"), since these are just variations on a common theme and don't work as advertised, and do much more harm than good.
Have any shots worked as advertised? Polio?.....
generally I refer to them as "injections" or "shots"
Exactly. None have proven to work, and generally cause the body to overdrive on detox and frequently causing the very symptoms purported to mitigate.
I don't know what's really in these shots except given the positive correlation is significant as shown through some autopsies and blood tests and morbidity and death that follow injections, I think we have more than a sneaking suspicion.
In the beginning of all this warp speed following shock and awe operation in 2020, it seemed at least commonsensical that mass injections, even given the evidence we had of "normalized injections" since the 1950s (and before) would result in countless harm and death. These people were lined up in stadiums, parks, parking lots, outside markets, etc. with no questions asked (like medications, health history, etc.) and shot up.
I do think that however you define these as shots, injections, vaxxes, bio/chemical weapons, there has been a concerted planned effort to do major harm on as much of the population as would succumb. We know the mix of metals and chemicals used, alone would cause harm (no need for mRNA/spike protean). But warp speed alone is sufficient to create a cocktail of mass destruction used on millions of unhealthy bodies. Manufacturing malpractice alone would yield countless deaths.
War has the same effect. You may not know who, but you know that hundreds of thousands and frequently millions will die.