An in silico database search cannot provide scientific evidence of a virus, lol. Read the Methods in a "virus sequencing" paper. Virologists don't apply scientific method and they don't sequence viruses. They make wild ridiculous assumptions, declare they have a "virus", and assemble genetic fragments of unknown provenance into a long…
An in silico database search cannot provide scientific evidence of a virus, lol. Read the Methods in a "virus sequencing" paper. Virologists don't apply scientific method and they don't sequence viruses. They make wild ridiculous assumptions, declare they have a "virus", and assemble genetic fragments of unknown provenance into a longer sequence, fraudulently labelling it a "virus genome", and upload those meaningless codes into your trusted databases.
check his interview with David Crowe. I think we made a transcript of that and put it in the chronology — it was early on — much more revealing — it was earlier on and he was more honest with Crowe than he was with me but David knew a fuck ton more than I did...search "crowe"
well, he screwed the pooch with me about three different times. he blew the whole Eurosurveillance thing...admitted he was going into the testing business...etc
Bit late, don't you think, for an alleged virus that supposedly crossed the planet 3 years ago, with millions of "confirmed cases" of infection? LOL. Seriously, I do not care what is in your database, when no one has any science showing that any of it came from a virus.
the sequences have no known origin. They are a work of fiction, that is not based on a true story. I cannot believe we are having this discussion but I guess there are a lot of robots who think they can catch a bad case of computer code. Evidently they already have.
Yes, the "genomes" are blatant works of fiction. I was referring to the smaller sequences that are used to fabricate the fraudulent "genomes". (And in some cases, even those smaller sequences are fictional, in the sense that they were "detected" via PCR with way too many cycles!)
An in silico database search cannot provide scientific evidence of a virus, lol. Read the Methods in a "virus sequencing" paper. Virologists don't apply scientific method and they don't sequence viruses. They make wild ridiculous assumptions, declare they have a "virus", and assemble genetic fragments of unknown provenance into a longer sequence, fraudulently labelling it a "virus genome", and upload those meaningless codes into your trusted databases.
Or maybe they're god...
Lol, great summary!!
check his interview with David Crowe. I think we made a transcript of that and put it in the chronology — it was early on — much more revealing — it was earlier on and he was more honest with Crowe than he was with me but David knew a fuck ton more than I did...search "crowe"
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/covid-chronology-5.2.0.pdf
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/200414-crowe-bustin-interview.pdf
well, he screwed the pooch with me about three different times. he blew the whole Eurosurveillance thing...admitted he was going into the testing business...etc
Mongol, what is the source of the primers? What is the amplicion actually pointing back to?
Bit late, don't you think, for an alleged virus that supposedly crossed the planet 3 years ago, with millions of "confirmed cases" of infection? LOL. Seriously, I do not care what is in your database, when no one has any science showing that any of it came from a virus.
Who cares, when no one has any science showing that any osequence came from something fitting the definition of a virus?
It's all Fantasy Football. There is no actual game; there are no actual players.
No one cares about sequences unless you can show they came from a "virus".
the sequences have no known origin. They are a work of fiction, that is not based on a true story. I cannot believe we are having this discussion but I guess there are a lot of robots who think they can catch a bad case of computer code. Evidently they already have.
Yes, the "genomes" are blatant works of fiction. I was referring to the smaller sequences that are used to fabricate the fraudulent "genomes". (And in some cases, even those smaller sequences are fictional, in the sense that they were "detected" via PCR with way too many cycles!)
is anyone sick of this metagenomic donkey turd yet?