This week, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is expected to announce his presidential candidacy at an event in Boston. What's going on here? Who is he, what does he stand for, and could he win?
Do you, does RFK Jr, have evidence (scientific evidence) that this 'lab-leaked contagion' has been identified in a human being or properly proven contagious and then isolated without the word games underpinning virology? RFK Jr has bragged.about his acumen in reading scientific papers re: environmental pollution and 'the law' but will not apply that brain power to unproven theories such as contagion. Why?
Anyone who wants to take on the system, particularly from within, has a near impossible task of unwinding a complex series of legal defenses to keep the oppression machine headed in a certain direction
Thank you for sharing this. I commented on it, though it's "waiting to be approved" by CHD. We will see how much they support free speech.
My comment was:
In the history of virology, NO VIRUS has ever been isolated and found. There is NO proof that viruses exist! Something else is making people sick. We are being poisoned and malnourished in many ways. Including but certainly not limited to toxic injections.
Thanks for that link--I decided to post comments over there on the fake pandemic. My comments are pending--let's see if they get posted over there. After all RFK Jr. is a champion of free speech, or rather, his free speech!
You probably already know the classic study of Rockefeller Medicine: _Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America_ by E. Richard Brown.
You can find him interviewed on that book on bitchute. Actually there are lots of videos of Eustace on line that are worth a listen, especially on the Federal Reserve.
Indeed. I first heard Eustace speak mostly about the Federal Reserve and banking via his series of interviews late in life with Daryl Bradford Smith on his show "The French Connection". Some of those interviews have been placed on line and are definitely worth hearing.
OMG!! I thought I was the only one who knew about Daryl Bradford Smith and The French Connection! Great show and great website--I learned so much from that guy. I know he had to shut down his site due to anti-free speech laws in France. It was such a shame because he unearthed so many hidden history books and made them into pdfs. I recently found a link to an archive of his site. I tried contacting his cousin, Jenny Lake, to see if he's been interviewed recently. But she said no. Too bad, I'd love to hear his take on where we are now--things are so much worse than I ever could have imagined. I knew we were headed collapse and that they wanted a one world govt, but never had any idea that they would try to pull all of this off via a fake pandemic and that they had plans for transhumanism and a digital slavegrid.
It's great to meet another DBS listener here, Sandra. Jenny Lake was a great guest of his. I had heard that he died, but perhaps he just went dark with the site and off the air.
Those books he shared were gems. Who else introduces people to authors like Nesta Webster?
Yeah, I also saw something online saying that he died, so that's why I found Jenny Lake's site and wrote her. But she didn't say he was dead, just said no more interviews and that she would pass along my thanks. So hopefully, he just went dark. Yeah, lots of excellent hidden history info, like Nesta Webster and more.
Very good analysis & I agree w/all the speakers' points here. Excellent commentary on cult leaders.
Agree that RFK Jr is a problematic candidate cuz of these major faults (& not only in the Health Freedom group but also in the Dim party at large & also due to Pubs' suspicions of him as an elite). Somehow Trump's garrulous, bombastic pomposity endeared him to lots of working class/pubs/cons, in spite of Trump's life-long Dim allegiance, tax fraud, sexual scandals & corrupt real estate "empire".
He was the perfect "actor" for those wanting to give the finger to the DC swamp & those uppity Dims.
1) RFK Jr supports viruses (contrary to massive evidence that they don't exist) & is not criticizing the clearly evident C19 hoax/scamdemic that was plotted out for decades & rolled out against the entire world. (RFKJr needs to ask one of his various CHD research assistants/paralegals to check out the legal documentation of Agenda 21/2030 & the UN's decades-long "Sustainability Development" scam;
2) RFK Jr supports vaxx (he only wants "safe ones"& and since they are all filled with toxic materials there's NO such thing, not to mention, once again, that there's NO need for them);
3) RFK Jr says he's running in the DFP - Dim Fascist Party (which is not to be confused with the Repub Thug Party that wants to overturn common progressive advances like equal pay/opportunity). Both complicit establishment parties are a part of the authoritarian uni-party that are bribed & corrupted w/all those who are ransacking, killing & otherwise looting our tax dollars & government agencies..
4) The myth of the Kennedy family"s so-called progressive legacy (counter to its actual mob ties & Joe Kennedy's & JFK's history of support for authoritarianism) & the later "Cult of Camelot Myth" that was planted by Jackie Kennedy after JFK was murdered. A myth created to supersede any examination or critical analysis of JFK admin's bogus facade of "progress" (as opposed to the JFK admin's actual record of support for & history of colonialist, militaristic & imperialist actions/plots world-wide).
Another major concern that wasn't mentioned here, is RFK's vocal support for the "Green New Deal", "Sustainable Development" & the entire "Climate Change" hoax/scam - all part of the UN's push for Agenda 21/2030 & CBDC digital money goals to control us further & take our rights away. The climate issue alone is the main reason he should be eliminated as a legitimate Prez candidate. :/
Finally, I have to reiterate here, as I've mentioned repeatedly in other stacks/places, there is no way to vote our way out of this deep state BS. Electronic voting machines are corrupted & elections are simply fraudulent. There is no way w/electronic voting machines to ever have a fair & secured election... ever.
Love the point that if RFKennedy Jr is actually elected, then it is because the Financial Interests/Deep State/Power Elites/Black Nobility wants him for some other useful, ulterior or unknown motives. Like perhaps quelling all dissent among awakening citizens around Cov19 & the UN's Agenda 21/2030??
(Maybe all the MSM criticisms against RFKJr's candidacy are to drive him into disgusted citizens arms?)
Great discussion, Eric, & thanks so much for this excellent analysis with both Michael and Jesse here. Looking forward to an update on this - part 2 - after RFK's announcement tomorrow & also later on.
Great analysis. He's still a democrat and not all that different from those tyrants. I saw an interview (maybe on CHD) where he claimed his grandfather was not a rum runner and a great man. Interesting stuff here too but haven't verified it: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/addendum-3-another-former-associate
Be sure to see the part about his (seemingly verified) greatly boosted $500k salary and the CHD president's comparatively meager $180k salary, funded by donors.
Okay - so read these stack links & forgot to come back over here & respond to you. Both of these are stunning (altho I already had very serious doubts about CHD/Kennedy re: the virus vs no virus issue & Bobby's support for the climate lies) & these links just add more to the pile of background facts on him that I didn't know or maybe didn't remember??
I didn't know the Epstein/Lolita info & had forgotten (?) the Mary Kennedy comments to friends about her fear of Bobby before she died. I never read the bio on Bobby so don't know if that was a hatchet job or is a real expose of him.
Will do more sleuthing around as it seems he is being promoted by lots of "well-known" medical freedom fighters so that makes me curious as to the divisions that are developing over his announcement/support. Seems like a reg shitshow. Thnx again for sharing these links.
I belong to no party and don't vote. I haven't seen the point and the uniparty has proven me right.
I vacillate between thinking RFK will get the Kennedy fate or that he will get elected so that they have a limited hangout in the Whitehouse. Kirsch has brought much to light yet he's an odd fellow, so it's suspicious how involved w/RFK he seems to be already, especially since he is uninterested in the relationship of the plandemic to the reset and similar. He's stuck on the vaxx being bad manufacturing practices. So it's possible all the election drama is/will be staged as a distraction while the cabal is moving other pieces forward.
To that end, if you don't read Michael Yon you must and you will see how badly we are being invaded every day as well as how europe via Holland is quickly going down the drain: https://michaelyon.locals.com/ so a high drama election (RFK, trump, old joe), especially with another kennedy assassination, may be the perfect cover to move us to another false flag, CBDC, marshal law, food shortage, energy shortage, war, extermination, or all of the above.
Thnx for the links & will have to get back to you on them later. Took a break from ss & now inundated with notifications/missed posts. That ole ss river just keeps on a rolling along ... :-)
Could you just elaborate more on what you mean by this > We need to look at what worked for 1933 Germany to understand how we can start to defeat the Abrahamic Allies.
Thanks, Eric, Jesse and Michael (alphabetic order). Good discussion. highlight points: RFK Jr’s candidacy is designed to cast the “health freedom movement” as being “extremist” while still fitting him and the “Big 10” inside the Big Tent and at the same time cast anyone who provides a critique more radical than they do as being people who are “off the planet” and who should stay there.Also provide a possibility of turning them into enforcers of a new official narrative if the need arises, selling “alternative treatments” and maybe “safe” versions of mRNA shots to the public. This is perfectly in parallel with Obama who sold new ways of “fighting the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11” to a war-weary public, as his “peace” presidency brought forth escalation in Afghanistan, a continuation of the slow withdrawal from Iraq already started by Dubya, drone assassination, and interventions in places like Libya, Yemen, Central Africa, Venezuela, Not to mention the “Pivot to Asia” to confront China.
If i had been “there” (in the conversation), i would have mentioned that some of us (e.g. me) saw through Obama even before he got elected. It was quite glaring that his candidacy took off in 2007 after he was endorsed by Zbigniew Brzezinski, https://foreignpolicy.com/2007/08/28/brzezinski-lends-obama-his-realist-aura/ Brzezinski harshly criticized the entire Iraq intervention as being a diversion from “the war on terrorism,” meaning from Afghanistan, which in his 1996 book The Grand Chessboard he indicated on a map (via a drawn circle) was the crucial place for the US to secure in order to maintain dominance over Eurasia. That’s a war he said could be justified to the US public only via “an attack on the US like Pearl Harbor,” preceding the Project For a New American Century’s use of the term “New Pearl Harbor” by some four years. Big Zbig was no stranger to Obama, as they met in the early ‘80s, when Obama was at Columbia U, and became a protege of Big Zbig, fresh from his role as Carter’s National Security Adviser (i.e. the top foreign policy person in the White House itself), during which he initiated the US intervention in Afghanistan, with the intent of drawing the Soviet Union into a quagmire. He bragged about this in 1998 to the French periodical Le Novelle Observateur. Note how Zbig’s son Mark was in the admin, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/08/13/ambassador-mark-brzezinski-appointed-executive-officer-arctic-executive-steering while daughter Mika became a top commentator on MSNBC.
Pritzker was the head of the Obama campaign’s financing committee, appointed by him as Sec of Commerce during his second admin. Her brother is the current governor of Illinois.
I would have said a bunch more about JFK too. In fact, i would have mentioned the entire legacy of the Democrats as an alleged vehicle for social change, be it the Woodrow Wilson “Progressive” administration, with the Fed Reserve, the FTC, and the Clayton Anti Trust Act, numerous military interventions culminating in the entry into WWI (at the end of which US troops took part in an attempted intervention in Russia, trying to restore the Czarist regime), the League of Nations,… Or the New Deal, which is particularly dear to “progressives” nowadays, the CFR, the creation of the post WWII US New World Order, The entire myth needs to be ripped up from bottom to top.
Thank you Michael, Jesse and Eric. I appreciated this interview. Kennedy’s position is “not a position about the truth”. Yes, this resonates. It’s disappointing that the covid truthers are not really pursuing truth after all. Yes, what is the purpose of his candidacy? I agree with Michael that “we the people” are the ones that can change things, not the politicians. I love the story Michael shared about the community in Northern Georgia that decided in April of 2020 to send their kids back to school and live life. I was living in a very liberal city in Western North Carolina during the pandemic. Masking, social distancing, following the arrows on grocery store floors is what everyone did. I remember going to South Carolina and it was like a whole different world with no pandemic. People were freely living their lives and not doing all the things we were told to do. I wanted to shout from the rooftops of my city, “Look! There are whole towns and cities not doing any of the things and they are just fine!”
RFK Jr.: "I want to start by saying that I am fiercely pro-vaccine. I had all six of my children vaccinated. I believe that vaccines have saved millions of lives. But I want vaccines that are as safe as possible, I want science that is robust"
How about we start by examining if there is any robust science to see if it has proven there are biological threats that the quackcines are needed to address? How can quackcInes save lives if the threat does not exist?
This post is troublesome. It is already sarcastic and cynical against someone who lost his father and uncle to government instigated or coordinated assassinations. This is no mean feat to declare a public run knowing what he knows , first hand, about how nefarious this country is and will continue to be. I do not see him in the same way as most other potential candidates as his risk is palpable and most liberals haven't a clue waging their campaigns from comfortable abodes.
One thing I have noticed about RFK is how careful he is in making pronouncements. He does not swing freely to appease a public that loves to rage and rant self-righteously and that includes both left and right politically. He works hard on developing coalitions, does his research with highly qualified people and puts together some amazing legal campaigns that have great success in holding this country accountable.
I expect he will have laid out his platform this morning in Boston and would think it would include environmental concerns, a significant part of his legal work over the years which does make him an expert, anti-war stances and calls for drug safety which is the essence of his position on vaccines
I would expect him to address a number of other things as well.
And let me remind people that if you go after RFK and mock his campaign there is no one else in view. Marianne Williams is holistic but she could not gain any media presence and will be treated the same again. Her campaign platform issues could not even get a hearing in the public due to the oligarchy control of that institution--even including the vast majority of the so-called liberal independent media. So how about toning down the criticisms and put develop some perspective on the situation. Biden? Trump? two sides of the same coin on all major issues. We need to get rid of them both and work on demolishing the power of the mass media and the oligarchs that control it and us.
How about your beginning by referring to him as "saint bobby.' You already make mockery and promote bias which is not meaningful journalism but, at the very least, an ode to your own ego but really demeans Kennedy as a viable and legitimate candidate. Other points I already made that demand some respect for this man who may literally be taking his life into his own hands given this country's history. I think he deserves a much more respectful presentation even if you think him not to your liking.
That's correct -- he IS being TREATED as Saint Bobby, can do no wrong and his lies are true. I have been covering him for the past year as a liar on medical and legal issues. And I am watching people who know the issues rally round the flagpole. It's disgusting, though I did say in this interview I would serve as his chief of security to keep him safe. This is not personal animosity. He is stepping into the political arena. And I do not think this was his decision alone -- he was drafted.
so if I may clarify: I am poking fun at all the venerating worshipful sycophants who are gathered around him; the people he PAYS to spread his lies; his policy of censorship on CHD while claiming to tell the truth...cmon.
I don't know what you feel you have uncovered but it you have real concerns or criticisms I would expect as a 'journalist' you would discuss them in a mature and professional way--not the snide, sarcasm that you seem to like which I find egotistical and not credible.
you speak like someone who has not read my work; I've been covering Kennedy for a year, and several of my reporters are deep in the discussion with him. Maybe listen to what we're saying; and listen to what all these blowjob outfits are doing -- presenting him as Mr Do No Wrong when he is an unabashed liar. He is not anti-vax. And he is pushing the US government narrative on covid while pretending to resist it. You're not addressing the facts.
Yes quite. Even Jon Rapopport has come out in his defence, accusing the 'no virus' camp of 'attacking him' (ie holding him to the science).
I can't comment on JR's blog (paid subscribers only) so I'll say here that nobody is demanding he take the 'no virus' position, just that he be honest and acknowledge the following whenever talking about the subject:
1. the virus existence issue is contentious and central to the whole debate
2. the field of virology is (at best) full of extremely dubious practices that do not meet the basic criteria of science (falsifiability etc)
3. it's not a fringe issue, with the likes of Yeadon now rejecting the SARS COV2 virus claim (for those who like to appeal to authority that should count for something)
4. it's not an isolated issue, with problematic practices and dubious claims being made by virologists throughout the last century
5. even contagion is an unproven theory, despite numerous real world studies which all failed to prove such a phenomenon exists
Just acknowledging these facts alone is enough to make the point (and put the ball in virologists' court) without having to 'take sides'. There IS an argument to be made that taking sides on this issue is divisive (practically speaking it would confuse the heck out of most people who have never looked at the science or history of virology), but what JR's rant failed to acknowledge is that RFK is already taking the 'virus' side simply by referring to 'the virus' and 'the pandemic' and even 'the vaccine'.
Even talking about 'vaccines' (minus the quotation marks) legitimises the concept of a 'virus' (just as talking about 'unicorn bridles' legitimises the concept of unicorns). RFK is making a whole string of positive claims about 'viruses' simply by discussing the topic using the terms provided, despite admitting (to Eric C during the Q&A) that he is no expert on the subject and that viruses may well be a fiction as far as he knows.
The scam of virology is fundamentally a linguistic scam, not even a scientific scam. The scam of virology was to invent terms / concepts like 'virus' and 'contagion' before they were proven to exist. That's the scam. To use the terminology provided is to perpetuate the scam. It's no different to accepting and then passing on counterfeit money, even after admitting you have no idea if the money is real or not.
The reason why RFK should not use the term 'virus' or 'SARS COV2' is the same as the reason why he should not refer to Rapopport as 'the rapist' or 'the car thief'. To use such words and phrases is to make a positive claim which supports a particular narrative (and a set of responses to that narrative).
That's why anyone using words like 'virus', 'unicorn', 'pandemic', 'rapist' or 'car thief' should be able to back up these positive claims with compelling evidence. And if they can't (and RFK admits he doesn't know if viruses are real) they should stop using those words and phrases.
That's NOT the same as being in the 'no virus' camp...... that's just being in the 'I'm not going to be reckless (and divisive) with my words' camp.
These 3 you mention may be better known but not necessarily more progressive. Sanders appears progressive only in comparison to people like Biden. Gabbard is hardly progressive on most issues I have heard in her comments. Abrams may be a good candidate regarding racism and voting rights but not necessarily on other issues, especially health care. Promoting Medicare is not health care as it is mainly/primarily a drug pushing program that is pro-pharma. I think Kennedy has the best grip on the issue of civil rights across the board but will agree that we need to hear more from him on several issues.
Good question. Acutally applies to all political sides as people mean such different things by the labels. For me progressive means questioning all authority--always and understanding the structural nature of power and it is applied. It also means working to change the structure of power and always looks at who is deciding what for whom. Self-determination for groups of people is critical--something that is never allowed except for those in power in a white,male supremacist society. Part of the goal is to always work toward building a soicety based on humanist values that include honoring nature. What can you say about yourself and your beliefs
I know personally that he knows it's a lie. I've explained it to him personally, and to his attorney, and I've personally handed them both the primary document that dismantles the fraud. I have read a year of correspondence with CHD on this issue. My job as a reporter is to know what people know, and to know how they know it, and when they found it out. He knows ALL about this.
Agreed that he a cautious person as a lawyer and as someone having grown up in the center of this beast. He knows very well what he is dealing with and believe he deserves some respect for his work and courage. I don't see him as a wimp the way Biden is
she has not read one word of my coverage. She seems to have read the headline and is not seeing the comment I am making. But Tanya, you've made your point, and further incursion into this discussion without something new to say will be marked as trolling.
Hi Eric! Catching up with Friday's show and can't wait to get to Tantra Studio! It sounds like a good one and as the mother to a son and husband supporting wife, it's a near and dear topic to me. I've been in discussions with the feminazi's, and they always tell me I've "internalized my misogyny". I say they've turned in to complete misandrists.
I also agree with your stance on this RFK Jr hoopla and it's nice. It's nice to know I'm not alone in my opinions and views. I'm pretty darn conservative, but that's not the reason I'll never vote for him. I base my opinions on my own personal observations, not on the infantile right versus left paradigm that is forced down our throats. And the chart of his announcement is quite chilling. One wonders if there will be a dog and pony show for the masses. One that get's everyone riled up. Our power's that should not be love playing games and putting on shows for our entrainment.
This was a pretty good interview about the whole shebang.
Rockefeller Medicine - I've read Eustice Mullins' book "Murder by Injection" several times and a few other books about our modern system. I'm very familiar with the Flexner Report and why we're here. I've done enough research to satisfy my curiosity and answer my own questions...but I'd not call myself a historian on the matter. Though I've always questioned the white coated priests, convid really opened my eyes to the lies we're told about our modern medical system. It's much, much worse than most know or would even guess.
Oh! We finally had six, yes SIX lovely, little purring bundles of joy! Mama and bebes are doing great.
I suspect the DNC will try to use him to divide the Republican vote. Not even remotetly implying RFK will be in on it, but with all the worship from the right he gets, its a good strategy for the DNC as its the only way the Dems can win in 2024.
I don't vote so I got no skin in that game. And I could not agree with you more. But I'm just calling it how I see it playing out. And it will work like a charm if they play it that way IMO.
I was a student at Wesleyan in Connecticut when Reagan was shot. A group sat in a dark room at a club called Eclectic watching the news. Teddy Jr was there as well as others connected similarly to Washington. That event was the beginning of my awakening to the uniparty. Two wings, one bird.
And George H.W., former director of the CIA, member of the Trilateral Commission, basically announced to the world who was really in charge of that administration.
Well, he's mythologized, as the discussion in the audio file notes.
JFK’s most enduring domestic measure was a tax cut that was heavily tilted towards business. His “Alliance for Progress” in Latin America was based upon the formation of the region’s notorious death squads, and included coups in El Salvador and Guatemala. The government of Canada was removed in a semi-coup in early ‘63 when it failed to go along with Kennedy plans for deployment of nuclear weapons. And a CIA-managed coup in Iraq in February of that year brought to power the Ba’ath Party, whose ranks included a young officer (and CIA asset) named Saddam Hussein. Also in the Middle East, JFK in the Summer of ‘63 stood firmly behind the Shah of Iran as he bloodily put down demonstrations against his dictatorial regime.
Kennedy’s Secretary of “Defense” McNamara undertook the building of a conventional war fighting capacity, which enabled the U.S. armed forces to fight actual wars on the ground.Some folks like to claim that JFK had planned to destroy the power of the Federal Reserve. One would wonder then why he appointed Robert Roosa of the CFR and the New York Fed Bank, the most important component of the system, to Assistant Treasury Secretary, and why Roosa not only stuck with JFK, but became an adviser to Robert Kennedy when he ran for president in ‘68, and brother Ted when he ran in ‘80. Do the Kennedys enjoy appointing advisers they disagree with? And do people from the top of the Fed system support those who would do away with their power? Likewise with McGeorge Bundy, CFR member and an adviser so close to JFK he was considered a family member, who stuck around for LBJ and later headed the Ford Foundation, a critical component of the elite’s control mechanism.
Thanks. I hope to have a long piece in the near future on the history of the Democratic Party as a counterinsurgency operation, channeling opposition movements back into the electoral process and by doing so weakening, dividing and destroying them. Doing so since 1916. Wasn't a good entity well before then, but that's when this particular facet of its operation started.
I would LOVE to read that! I was in Colombia in 1982 as a student of Latin American politics. People in US have no idea what US has been doing in LA for decades. I like Kinzer's 'Overthrow' ...
Oh, yes, corrupt US govt is always up to no good. I recall reading about some of what happened in Latin America. I think it was in El Salvador that the US was running death squads--I think that Negroponte guy was running them. And then when he was in the GW Bush administration, death squads showed up in Iraq. And I think they used to train those people at the School of Americas (where they trained people in torture, govt over throw, etc and then sent them back to their home countries to use their newly acquired skills). But yes, you are correct, most Americans have no clue what the US govt has been up to around the world.
Thank you for this post! It is so refreshing to have honest journalism available. My hope for the world is where the truth is told no matter what. So keep doing what you are doing. Whenever I feel unsure about something I will always check here, or with Peggy Hall, Cowan etc…
A pro-vaxxer leading law suits against vaccines. That really is special, and representative of American dysfunction.
Despite the good works of CHD, ICAN, the books he has written or encouraged on the politics of '(nonexistent) 'viruses' (Plague. Plague of Corruption, Fauci), he perpetuates the fearmongering ('viruses' and lab leaks and gain-of-fiction). As much I want to believe/hope, US politics and its government is proven by the con of COVID, for the whole world to see, to be fundamentally corrupt, and cannot be trusted.
"Remember the crazy right-wing conspiracy theory alleging that our food purchases will be tracked to reduce our CO2 consumption? That one is turning out to be true! Yesterday, New York City announced its plan to track the “food choices” of New Yorkers using credit card data from individual store purchases. According to the mayor, tracking individual food choices is a step towards “reducing the CO2 output” of New Yorkers. "
Bottom line: they are continuing to move forward with their agenda at epic speed. For all we know, this will all be in place by the time the next election rolls around.
Eric - Just read this article (below) & had to come back here & post it. Esp in view of your "bad feeling" & astrological readings that you mentioned in your conversation with Michael & Jesse here as related to RFKJr's announcement for President tomorrow .
It's just simply mind-boggling to consider all of the bad connections to the date April 19 in US history (as well as this week). Just so many traumatic events that they can't all be a coincidence (consider the probability?) & must be a result of governmental pre-planning for their occurrence on those dates.
(When you mentioned your dread of tomorrow, I thought immediately of the alleged OKC bombing ("alleged" only because of later evidence discounting the storyline). See A Noble Lie documentary that absolutely ruled out the govt's original version according to conflicting first responders & eyewitness accounts & material evidence. And I also am originally from OK & had family in the metro area when it happened. So synching up the govt's account with the actual on-the-ground version was impossible.
> The Oklahoma City bombing was a domestic terrorist truck bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, on April 19, 1995. (Tim McVeigh didn't do it.) It was the deadliest act of terrorism in U.S. history until the September 11 attacks in 2001 surpassed it.
From investigative evidence since then, clearly the first NYC WTC Bombing on Feb 26,1993; the OKC Bombing on April 19, 1995 & the Boston Marathon Bombing on April 15, 2013 were all false flags leading up to the BIG 9/11 Lie carried out on Sept 11, 2001. How exactly did WTC Building 7 collapse?
> Robert Kennedy Jr. picks a terrible week in American history to announce his presidential campaign
Excerpt: "Robert Kennedy Jr. is announcing his 2024 presidential campaign on April 19, which was once known for the "shot heard around the world." It was when gunfire broke out in Lexington and Concord, sparking the start of the American Revolution. The colonists began a long and bloody war with the British for independence. While it ended well for the United States, it also meant the then-small country lost many of its citizens."
"Today the date means something else for many others, however. April 19 was the final day of the Waco stand off in which ATF and FBI agents moved in to put teargas in the house. A fire was started, which ended with the 76 Branch Davidians cult members killed, including 25 children who were the result of cult leader David Koresh impregnating several young women and minors on the compound."
"Two years after Waco, an anti-government, pro-gun veteran detonated a bomb at the U.S. federal building offices in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people, including 19 children. He did it because there were ATF agents in the building that were also in Waco."
"The five days between April 15 and 20 are some of the worst in American history. Not only did that week contain the OKC bombing and the end of the Waco stand off, but the Boston Marathon Bombing was also on April 15, the mass shooting at Virginia Tech on April 16, and the Columbine massacre on April 20."
Holy moley, Eric. How's that for planned synchronicity & masonic tinkering w/US emotional traumas??
https://www.amazon.com/Wuhan-Cover-Up-Officials-Conspired-Childrens/dp/1510773983/
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose meticulously researched and rigorously sourced analysis, leads readers on a staggering journey to learn about:
the key enablers and henchmen pushing for gain-of-function research
the economic motives behind gain-of-function research
successfully engineered “chimeric viruses” that can infect and kill humans
the coordinated effort to silence speculation of COVID-19’s laboratory genesis
the complicity of scientific journals to hide the origins of COVID-19
the role of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China’s biowarfare/biodefense program
the relationships between US health, military, and intelligence bureaucracies and scientists and their Chinese counterparts
the roles of Bill Gates and Sir Jeremy Farrar in helping to orchestrate China’s global cover-up
The Wuhan Cover-Up unveils a global conspiracy of epic proportion and lethal consequence.
Thanks for posting!!
Well, that certainly says it all--completely in lock-step with the official BS establishment narrative.
How is this "resistance"? Seems like fake and subverted opposition to me.
I worry that all of this "China, China, China" crap is going to be used to get us into WW3 with China.
How is this resistance? Exactly the question Sandra.
Do you, does RFK Jr, have evidence (scientific evidence) that this 'lab-leaked contagion' has been identified in a human being or properly proven contagious and then isolated without the word games underpinning virology? RFK Jr has bragged.about his acumen in reading scientific papers re: environmental pollution and 'the law' but will not apply that brain power to unproven theories such as contagion. Why?
He's conceded to only reading the abstracts which we know tell nothing of the methods used.
So anyone who thinks RFK is a renegade candidate want to explain this- from CHD today:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-wuhan-lab-leak-senate-report/
Why in the world would they post this crap if they are what they claim to be?
Um...
Read the author of that posts credentials, Communications=PR, the 'PR' in propaganda. :]
What is your take on the legal framework that apparently allows all this to take place?
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/biden-rescinding-trump-biden-proclamation
Anyone who wants to take on the system, particularly from within, has a near impossible task of unwinding a complex series of legal defenses to keep the oppression machine headed in a certain direction
Thank you for sharing this. I commented on it, though it's "waiting to be approved" by CHD. We will see how much they support free speech.
My comment was:
In the history of virology, NO VIRUS has ever been isolated and found. There is NO proof that viruses exist! Something else is making people sick. We are being poisoned and malnourished in many ways. Including but certainly not limited to toxic injections.
Thanks for that link--I decided to post comments over there on the fake pandemic. My comments are pending--let's see if they get posted over there. After all RFK Jr. is a champion of free speech, or rather, his free speech!
You probably already know the classic study of Rockefeller Medicine: _Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism in America_ by E. Richard Brown.
Also “Murder By Injection” by Eustace Mullins
You can find him interviewed on that book on bitchute. Actually there are lots of videos of Eustace on line that are worth a listen, especially on the Federal Reserve.
Indeed. I first heard Eustace speak mostly about the Federal Reserve and banking via his series of interviews late in life with Daryl Bradford Smith on his show "The French Connection". Some of those interviews have been placed on line and are definitely worth hearing.
OMG!! I thought I was the only one who knew about Daryl Bradford Smith and The French Connection! Great show and great website--I learned so much from that guy. I know he had to shut down his site due to anti-free speech laws in France. It was such a shame because he unearthed so many hidden history books and made them into pdfs. I recently found a link to an archive of his site. I tried contacting his cousin, Jenny Lake, to see if he's been interviewed recently. But she said no. Too bad, I'd love to hear his take on where we are now--things are so much worse than I ever could have imagined. I knew we were headed collapse and that they wanted a one world govt, but never had any idea that they would try to pull all of this off via a fake pandemic and that they had plans for transhumanism and a digital slavegrid.
It's great to meet another DBS listener here, Sandra. Jenny Lake was a great guest of his. I had heard that he died, but perhaps he just went dark with the site and off the air.
Those books he shared were gems. Who else introduces people to authors like Nesta Webster?
Yeah, I also saw something online saying that he died, so that's why I found Jenny Lake's site and wrote her. But she didn't say he was dead, just said no more interviews and that she would pass along my thanks. So hopefully, he just went dark. Yeah, lots of excellent hidden history info, like Nesta Webster and more.
Very good analysis & I agree w/all the speakers' points here. Excellent commentary on cult leaders.
Agree that RFK Jr is a problematic candidate cuz of these major faults (& not only in the Health Freedom group but also in the Dim party at large & also due to Pubs' suspicions of him as an elite). Somehow Trump's garrulous, bombastic pomposity endeared him to lots of working class/pubs/cons, in spite of Trump's life-long Dim allegiance, tax fraud, sexual scandals & corrupt real estate "empire".
He was the perfect "actor" for those wanting to give the finger to the DC swamp & those uppity Dims.
1) RFK Jr supports viruses (contrary to massive evidence that they don't exist) & is not criticizing the clearly evident C19 hoax/scamdemic that was plotted out for decades & rolled out against the entire world. (RFKJr needs to ask one of his various CHD research assistants/paralegals to check out the legal documentation of Agenda 21/2030 & the UN's decades-long "Sustainability Development" scam;
2) RFK Jr supports vaxx (he only wants "safe ones"& and since they are all filled with toxic materials there's NO such thing, not to mention, once again, that there's NO need for them);
3) RFK Jr says he's running in the DFP - Dim Fascist Party (which is not to be confused with the Repub Thug Party that wants to overturn common progressive advances like equal pay/opportunity). Both complicit establishment parties are a part of the authoritarian uni-party that are bribed & corrupted w/all those who are ransacking, killing & otherwise looting our tax dollars & government agencies..
4) The myth of the Kennedy family"s so-called progressive legacy (counter to its actual mob ties & Joe Kennedy's & JFK's history of support for authoritarianism) & the later "Cult of Camelot Myth" that was planted by Jackie Kennedy after JFK was murdered. A myth created to supersede any examination or critical analysis of JFK admin's bogus facade of "progress" (as opposed to the JFK admin's actual record of support for & history of colonialist, militaristic & imperialist actions/plots world-wide).
Another major concern that wasn't mentioned here, is RFK's vocal support for the "Green New Deal", "Sustainable Development" & the entire "Climate Change" hoax/scam - all part of the UN's push for Agenda 21/2030 & CBDC digital money goals to control us further & take our rights away. The climate issue alone is the main reason he should be eliminated as a legitimate Prez candidate. :/
Finally, I have to reiterate here, as I've mentioned repeatedly in other stacks/places, there is no way to vote our way out of this deep state BS. Electronic voting machines are corrupted & elections are simply fraudulent. There is no way w/electronic voting machines to ever have a fair & secured election... ever.
Love the point that if RFKennedy Jr is actually elected, then it is because the Financial Interests/Deep State/Power Elites/Black Nobility wants him for some other useful, ulterior or unknown motives. Like perhaps quelling all dissent among awakening citizens around Cov19 & the UN's Agenda 21/2030??
(Maybe all the MSM criticisms against RFKJr's candidacy are to drive him into disgusted citizens arms?)
Great discussion, Eric, & thanks so much for this excellent analysis with both Michael and Jesse here. Looking forward to an update on this - part 2 - after RFK's announcement tomorrow & also later on.
Keep up the good work.
Great analysis. He's still a democrat and not all that different from those tyrants. I saw an interview (maybe on CHD) where he claimed his grandfather was not a rum runner and a great man. Interesting stuff here too but haven't verified it: https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/addendum-3-another-former-associate
Be sure to see the part about his (seemingly verified) greatly boosted $500k salary and the CHD president's comparatively meager $180k salary, funded by donors.
See this too: https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/robert-kennedy-steve-kirsch-and-robert
Okay - so read these stack links & forgot to come back over here & respond to you. Both of these are stunning (altho I already had very serious doubts about CHD/Kennedy re: the virus vs no virus issue & Bobby's support for the climate lies) & these links just add more to the pile of background facts on him that I didn't know or maybe didn't remember??
I didn't know the Epstein/Lolita info & had forgotten (?) the Mary Kennedy comments to friends about her fear of Bobby before she died. I never read the bio on Bobby so don't know if that was a hatchet job or is a real expose of him.
Will do more sleuthing around as it seems he is being promoted by lots of "well-known" medical freedom fighters so that makes me curious as to the divisions that are developing over his announcement/support. Seems like a reg shitshow. Thnx again for sharing these links.
It's nothing - thank you for all your efforts!
I belong to no party and don't vote. I haven't seen the point and the uniparty has proven me right.
I vacillate between thinking RFK will get the Kennedy fate or that he will get elected so that they have a limited hangout in the Whitehouse. Kirsch has brought much to light yet he's an odd fellow, so it's suspicious how involved w/RFK he seems to be already, especially since he is uninterested in the relationship of the plandemic to the reset and similar. He's stuck on the vaxx being bad manufacturing practices. So it's possible all the election drama is/will be staged as a distraction while the cabal is moving other pieces forward.
To that end, if you don't read Michael Yon you must and you will see how badly we are being invaded every day as well as how europe via Holland is quickly going down the drain: https://michaelyon.locals.com/ so a high drama election (RFK, trump, old joe), especially with another kennedy assassination, may be the perfect cover to move us to another false flag, CBDC, marshal law, food shortage, energy shortage, war, extermination, or all of the above.
Thnx for the links & will have to get back to you on them later. Took a break from ss & now inundated with notifications/missed posts. That ole ss river just keeps on a rolling along ... :-)
Could you just elaborate more on what you mean by this > We need to look at what worked for 1933 Germany to understand how we can start to defeat the Abrahamic Allies.
Confusing statement to me.
Thanks, Eric, Jesse and Michael (alphabetic order). Good discussion. highlight points: RFK Jr’s candidacy is designed to cast the “health freedom movement” as being “extremist” while still fitting him and the “Big 10” inside the Big Tent and at the same time cast anyone who provides a critique more radical than they do as being people who are “off the planet” and who should stay there.Also provide a possibility of turning them into enforcers of a new official narrative if the need arises, selling “alternative treatments” and maybe “safe” versions of mRNA shots to the public. This is perfectly in parallel with Obama who sold new ways of “fighting the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11” to a war-weary public, as his “peace” presidency brought forth escalation in Afghanistan, a continuation of the slow withdrawal from Iraq already started by Dubya, drone assassination, and interventions in places like Libya, Yemen, Central Africa, Venezuela, Not to mention the “Pivot to Asia” to confront China.
If i had been “there” (in the conversation), i would have mentioned that some of us (e.g. me) saw through Obama even before he got elected. It was quite glaring that his candidacy took off in 2007 after he was endorsed by Zbigniew Brzezinski, https://foreignpolicy.com/2007/08/28/brzezinski-lends-obama-his-realist-aura/ Brzezinski harshly criticized the entire Iraq intervention as being a diversion from “the war on terrorism,” meaning from Afghanistan, which in his 1996 book The Grand Chessboard he indicated on a map (via a drawn circle) was the crucial place for the US to secure in order to maintain dominance over Eurasia. That’s a war he said could be justified to the US public only via “an attack on the US like Pearl Harbor,” preceding the Project For a New American Century’s use of the term “New Pearl Harbor” by some four years. Big Zbig was no stranger to Obama, as they met in the early ‘80s, when Obama was at Columbia U, and became a protege of Big Zbig, fresh from his role as Carter’s National Security Adviser (i.e. the top foreign policy person in the White House itself), during which he initiated the US intervention in Afghanistan, with the intent of drawing the Soviet Union into a quagmire. He bragged about this in 1998 to the French periodical Le Novelle Observateur. Note how Zbig’s son Mark was in the admin, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/08/13/ambassador-mark-brzezinski-appointed-executive-officer-arctic-executive-steering while daughter Mika became a top commentator on MSNBC.
Also worth mentioning that Obama announced his first run for office, Illinois state senate, at the home of Penny Pritzker, a member of one of America’s wealthiest families, whose Cleveland bank initiated sub prime mortgages. This was already known in April 2008, well before the election. https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/2008/4/28/18576987/obama-s-billionaire-finance-chair-penny-pritzker-s-failed-bank-lost-money-for-1-400-customers
Pritzker was the head of the Obama campaign’s financing committee, appointed by him as Sec of Commerce during his second admin. Her brother is the current governor of Illinois.
I would have said a bunch more about JFK too. In fact, i would have mentioned the entire legacy of the Democrats as an alleged vehicle for social change, be it the Woodrow Wilson “Progressive” administration, with the Fed Reserve, the FTC, and the Clayton Anti Trust Act, numerous military interventions culminating in the entry into WWI (at the end of which US troops took part in an attempted intervention in Russia, trying to restore the Czarist regime), the League of Nations,… Or the New Deal, which is particularly dear to “progressives” nowadays, the CFR, the creation of the post WWII US New World Order, The entire myth needs to be ripped up from bottom to top.
Thank you Michael, Jesse and Eric. I appreciated this interview. Kennedy’s position is “not a position about the truth”. Yes, this resonates. It’s disappointing that the covid truthers are not really pursuing truth after all. Yes, what is the purpose of his candidacy? I agree with Michael that “we the people” are the ones that can change things, not the politicians. I love the story Michael shared about the community in Northern Georgia that decided in April of 2020 to send their kids back to school and live life. I was living in a very liberal city in Western North Carolina during the pandemic. Masking, social distancing, following the arrows on grocery store floors is what everyone did. I remember going to South Carolina and it was like a whole different world with no pandemic. People were freely living their lives and not doing all the things we were told to do. I wanted to shout from the rooftops of my city, “Look! There are whole towns and cities not doing any of the things and they are just fine!”
RFK Jr.: "I want to start by saying that I am fiercely pro-vaccine. I had all six of my children vaccinated. I believe that vaccines have saved millions of lives. But I want vaccines that are as safe as possible, I want science that is robust"
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/members-only/vaccine-safety-project-transcript/
How about we start by examining if there is any robust science to see if it has proven there are biological threats that the quackcines are needed to address? How can quackcInes save lives if the threat does not exist?
"How can quackcInes save lives if the threat does not exist?"
That really is the long and short of it!
FUNNY HOW RFK Jr Just popped up like a whack a mole at this time NEVER TRUST THE ANTI AMERICAN demonicrats
I think you're onto something here.
CHD started out as: World Mercury Project.
And if you visit, www.worldmercuryproject.org, you'll see where it takes you.
Here are some sources to confirm that as well:
1.) https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/robert-f-kennedy-jr-launches-the-world-mercury-project-300364404.html
2.) https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/robert-f-kennedy-jr-announces-the-launch-of-childrens-health-defense-300710874.html
This post is troublesome. It is already sarcastic and cynical against someone who lost his father and uncle to government instigated or coordinated assassinations. This is no mean feat to declare a public run knowing what he knows , first hand, about how nefarious this country is and will continue to be. I do not see him in the same way as most other potential candidates as his risk is palpable and most liberals haven't a clue waging their campaigns from comfortable abodes.
One thing I have noticed about RFK is how careful he is in making pronouncements. He does not swing freely to appease a public that loves to rage and rant self-righteously and that includes both left and right politically. He works hard on developing coalitions, does his research with highly qualified people and puts together some amazing legal campaigns that have great success in holding this country accountable.
I expect he will have laid out his platform this morning in Boston and would think it would include environmental concerns, a significant part of his legal work over the years which does make him an expert, anti-war stances and calls for drug safety which is the essence of his position on vaccines
I would expect him to address a number of other things as well.
And let me remind people that if you go after RFK and mock his campaign there is no one else in view. Marianne Williams is holistic but she could not gain any media presence and will be treated the same again. Her campaign platform issues could not even get a hearing in the public due to the oligarchy control of that institution--even including the vast majority of the so-called liberal independent media. So how about toning down the criticisms and put develop some perspective on the situation. Biden? Trump? two sides of the same coin on all major issues. We need to get rid of them both and work on demolishing the power of the mass media and the oligarchs that control it and us.
where exactly is the cynicism? the written part is a sober journalistic analysis; the panel discussion is sincere, informed and circumspect.
How about your beginning by referring to him as "saint bobby.' You already make mockery and promote bias which is not meaningful journalism but, at the very least, an ode to your own ego but really demeans Kennedy as a viable and legitimate candidate. Other points I already made that demand some respect for this man who may literally be taking his life into his own hands given this country's history. I think he deserves a much more respectful presentation even if you think him not to your liking.
That's correct -- he IS being TREATED as Saint Bobby, can do no wrong and his lies are true. I have been covering him for the past year as a liar on medical and legal issues. And I am watching people who know the issues rally round the flagpole. It's disgusting, though I did say in this interview I would serve as his chief of security to keep him safe. This is not personal animosity. He is stepping into the political arena. And I do not think this was his decision alone -- he was drafted.
so if I may clarify: I am poking fun at all the venerating worshipful sycophants who are gathered around him; the people he PAYS to spread his lies; his policy of censorship on CHD while claiming to tell the truth...cmon.
I don't know what you feel you have uncovered but it you have real concerns or criticisms I would expect as a 'journalist' you would discuss them in a mature and professional way--not the snide, sarcasm that you seem to like which I find egotistical and not credible.
you speak like someone who has not read my work; I've been covering Kennedy for a year, and several of my reporters are deep in the discussion with him. Maybe listen to what we're saying; and listen to what all these blowjob outfits are doing -- presenting him as Mr Do No Wrong when he is an unabashed liar. He is not anti-vax. And he is pushing the US government narrative on covid while pretending to resist it. You're not addressing the facts.
"he IS being TREATED as Saint Bobby"
Yes quite. Even Jon Rapopport has come out in his defence, accusing the 'no virus' camp of 'attacking him' (ie holding him to the science).
I can't comment on JR's blog (paid subscribers only) so I'll say here that nobody is demanding he take the 'no virus' position, just that he be honest and acknowledge the following whenever talking about the subject:
1. the virus existence issue is contentious and central to the whole debate
2. the field of virology is (at best) full of extremely dubious practices that do not meet the basic criteria of science (falsifiability etc)
3. it's not a fringe issue, with the likes of Yeadon now rejecting the SARS COV2 virus claim (for those who like to appeal to authority that should count for something)
4. it's not an isolated issue, with problematic practices and dubious claims being made by virologists throughout the last century
5. even contagion is an unproven theory, despite numerous real world studies which all failed to prove such a phenomenon exists
Just acknowledging these facts alone is enough to make the point (and put the ball in virologists' court) without having to 'take sides'. There IS an argument to be made that taking sides on this issue is divisive (practically speaking it would confuse the heck out of most people who have never looked at the science or history of virology), but what JR's rant failed to acknowledge is that RFK is already taking the 'virus' side simply by referring to 'the virus' and 'the pandemic' and even 'the vaccine'.
Even talking about 'vaccines' (minus the quotation marks) legitimises the concept of a 'virus' (just as talking about 'unicorn bridles' legitimises the concept of unicorns). RFK is making a whole string of positive claims about 'viruses' simply by discussing the topic using the terms provided, despite admitting (to Eric C during the Q&A) that he is no expert on the subject and that viruses may well be a fiction as far as he knows.
The scam of virology is fundamentally a linguistic scam, not even a scientific scam. The scam of virology was to invent terms / concepts like 'virus' and 'contagion' before they were proven to exist. That's the scam. To use the terminology provided is to perpetuate the scam. It's no different to accepting and then passing on counterfeit money, even after admitting you have no idea if the money is real or not.
The reason why RFK should not use the term 'virus' or 'SARS COV2' is the same as the reason why he should not refer to Rapopport as 'the rapist' or 'the car thief'. To use such words and phrases is to make a positive claim which supports a particular narrative (and a set of responses to that narrative).
That's why anyone using words like 'virus', 'unicorn', 'pandemic', 'rapist' or 'car thief' should be able to back up these positive claims with compelling evidence. And if they can't (and RFK admits he doesn't know if viruses are real) they should stop using those words and phrases.
That's NOT the same as being in the 'no virus' camp...... that's just being in the 'I'm not going to be reckless (and divisive) with my words' camp.
These 3 you mention may be better known but not necessarily more progressive. Sanders appears progressive only in comparison to people like Biden. Gabbard is hardly progressive on most issues I have heard in her comments. Abrams may be a good candidate regarding racism and voting rights but not necessarily on other issues, especially health care. Promoting Medicare is not health care as it is mainly/primarily a drug pushing program that is pro-pharma. I think Kennedy has the best grip on the issue of civil rights across the board but will agree that we need to hear more from him on several issues.
What's a "progressive?"
Someone who believes they know what’s best for others and who cannot leave well enough alone.
Good question. Acutally applies to all political sides as people mean such different things by the labels. For me progressive means questioning all authority--always and understanding the structural nature of power and it is applied. It also means working to change the structure of power and always looks at who is deciding what for whom. Self-determination for groups of people is critical--something that is never allowed except for those in power in a white,male supremacist society. Part of the goal is to always work toward building a soicety based on humanist values that include honoring nature. What can you say about yourself and your beliefs
Oh? and what would you suggest? Do you even know what my politics are?
I know personally that he knows it's a lie. I've explained it to him personally, and to his attorney, and I've personally handed them both the primary document that dismantles the fraud. I have read a year of correspondence with CHD on this issue. My job as a reporter is to know what people know, and to know how they know it, and when they found it out. He knows ALL about this.
https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/why-is-robert-f-kennedy-jr-running
Agreed that he a cautious person as a lawyer and as someone having grown up in the center of this beast. He knows very well what he is dealing with and believe he deserves some respect for his work and courage. I don't see him as a wimp the way Biden is
she has not read one word of my coverage. She seems to have read the headline and is not seeing the comment I am making. But Tanya, you've made your point, and further incursion into this discussion without something new to say will be marked as trolling.
Hi Eric! Catching up with Friday's show and can't wait to get to Tantra Studio! It sounds like a good one and as the mother to a son and husband supporting wife, it's a near and dear topic to me. I've been in discussions with the feminazi's, and they always tell me I've "internalized my misogyny". I say they've turned in to complete misandrists.
I also agree with your stance on this RFK Jr hoopla and it's nice. It's nice to know I'm not alone in my opinions and views. I'm pretty darn conservative, but that's not the reason I'll never vote for him. I base my opinions on my own personal observations, not on the infantile right versus left paradigm that is forced down our throats. And the chart of his announcement is quite chilling. One wonders if there will be a dog and pony show for the masses. One that get's everyone riled up. Our power's that should not be love playing games and putting on shows for our entrainment.
This was a pretty good interview about the whole shebang.
Rockefeller Medicine - I've read Eustice Mullins' book "Murder by Injection" several times and a few other books about our modern system. I'm very familiar with the Flexner Report and why we're here. I've done enough research to satisfy my curiosity and answer my own questions...but I'd not call myself a historian on the matter. Though I've always questioned the white coated priests, convid really opened my eyes to the lies we're told about our modern medical system. It's much, much worse than most know or would even guess.
Oh! We finally had six, yes SIX lovely, little purring bundles of joy! Mama and bebes are doing great.
Does anyone need a kitten in about 10 weeks? LOL
I suspect the DNC will try to use him to divide the Republican vote. Not even remotetly implying RFK will be in on it, but with all the worship from the right he gets, its a good strategy for the DNC as its the only way the Dems can win in 2024.
From "Mrs Robinson," the Simon and Garfunkel tune popular 55 years ago this month (i was a college junior).
"Sitting on a sofa on a Sunday afternoon
Going to the candidates debate
Laugh about it, shout about it
When you've got to choose
Every way you look at this, you lose"
They got it back then. Anyone who thinks the Republicrats and Demopublicans are different still hasn't.
I don't vote so I got no skin in that game. And I could not agree with you more. But I'm just calling it how I see it playing out. And it will work like a charm if they play it that way IMO.
Yeah, it's part of the game plan. As is getting people excited again about "Warp Speed" Trump as being somehow an opponent of the Operation.
I was a student at Wesleyan in Connecticut when Reagan was shot. A group sat in a dark room at a club called Eclectic watching the news. Teddy Jr was there as well as others connected similarly to Washington. That event was the beginning of my awakening to the uniparty. Two wings, one bird.
And George H.W., former director of the CIA, member of the Trilateral Commission, basically announced to the world who was really in charge of that administration.
well, they do make illegal...
No politician is going to save us. Almost all of them are bought and paid for. If they are not they will be eliminated. Just like JFK.
Well, he's mythologized, as the discussion in the audio file notes.
JFK’s most enduring domestic measure was a tax cut that was heavily tilted towards business. His “Alliance for Progress” in Latin America was based upon the formation of the region’s notorious death squads, and included coups in El Salvador and Guatemala. The government of Canada was removed in a semi-coup in early ‘63 when it failed to go along with Kennedy plans for deployment of nuclear weapons. And a CIA-managed coup in Iraq in February of that year brought to power the Ba’ath Party, whose ranks included a young officer (and CIA asset) named Saddam Hussein. Also in the Middle East, JFK in the Summer of ‘63 stood firmly behind the Shah of Iran as he bloodily put down demonstrations against his dictatorial regime.
Kennedy’s Secretary of “Defense” McNamara undertook the building of a conventional war fighting capacity, which enabled the U.S. armed forces to fight actual wars on the ground.Some folks like to claim that JFK had planned to destroy the power of the Federal Reserve. One would wonder then why he appointed Robert Roosa of the CFR and the New York Fed Bank, the most important component of the system, to Assistant Treasury Secretary, and why Roosa not only stuck with JFK, but became an adviser to Robert Kennedy when he ran for president in ‘68, and brother Ted when he ran in ‘80. Do the Kennedys enjoy appointing advisers they disagree with? And do people from the top of the Fed system support those who would do away with their power? Likewise with McGeorge Bundy, CFR member and an adviser so close to JFK he was considered a family member, who stuck around for LBJ and later headed the Ford Foundation, a critical component of the elite’s control mechanism.
Thank you for taking the time to post all of this information.
Thanks. I hope to have a long piece in the near future on the history of the Democratic Party as a counterinsurgency operation, channeling opposition movements back into the electoral process and by doing so weakening, dividing and destroying them. Doing so since 1916. Wasn't a good entity well before then, but that's when this particular facet of its operation started.
I would LOVE to read that! I was in Colombia in 1982 as a student of Latin American politics. People in US have no idea what US has been doing in LA for decades. I like Kinzer's 'Overthrow' ...
Thanks. I'll try to announce here, if i'm lucky it might even be posted here.
Oh, yes, corrupt US govt is always up to no good. I recall reading about some of what happened in Latin America. I think it was in El Salvador that the US was running death squads--I think that Negroponte guy was running them. And then when he was in the GW Bush administration, death squads showed up in Iraq. And I think they used to train those people at the School of Americas (where they trained people in torture, govt over throw, etc and then sent them back to their home countries to use their newly acquired skills). But yes, you are correct, most Americans have no clue what the US govt has been up to around the world.
Your writing is fabulous and highly informative. Do you have your own stack?
Thanks, i am strongly considering.
Well, you and our buddy Eric Francis rock! I would definitely be an interested reader if you were to start a stack.
I hope you do!!
Looking forward to it! I'm sure I'll have thoughts to add.
Thank you for this post! It is so refreshing to have honest journalism available. My hope for the world is where the truth is told no matter what. So keep doing what you are doing. Whenever I feel unsure about something I will always check here, or with Peggy Hall, Cowan etc…
A pro-vaxxer leading law suits against vaccines. That really is special, and representative of American dysfunction.
Despite the good works of CHD, ICAN, the books he has written or encouraged on the politics of '(nonexistent) 'viruses' (Plague. Plague of Corruption, Fauci), he perpetuates the fearmongering ('viruses' and lab leaks and gain-of-fiction). As much I want to believe/hope, US politics and its government is proven by the con of COVID, for the whole world to see, to be fundamentally corrupt, and cannot be trusted.
RFK Jr is no exception.
And I wonder what RFK Jr. thinks about this:
New York City to Track Personal Food Choices Using Credit Card Data
This is needed to fight climate change, NYC mayor says
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/new-york-city-to-track-personal-food
"Remember the crazy right-wing conspiracy theory alleging that our food purchases will be tracked to reduce our CO2 consumption? That one is turning out to be true! Yesterday, New York City announced its plan to track the “food choices” of New Yorkers using credit card data from individual store purchases. According to the mayor, tracking individual food choices is a step towards “reducing the CO2 output” of New Yorkers. "
Bottom line: they are continuing to move forward with their agenda at epic speed. For all we know, this will all be in place by the time the next election rolls around.
wow!
Eric - Just read this article (below) & had to come back here & post it. Esp in view of your "bad feeling" & astrological readings that you mentioned in your conversation with Michael & Jesse here as related to RFKJr's announcement for President tomorrow .
It's just simply mind-boggling to consider all of the bad connections to the date April 19 in US history (as well as this week). Just so many traumatic events that they can't all be a coincidence (consider the probability?) & must be a result of governmental pre-planning for their occurrence on those dates.
(When you mentioned your dread of tomorrow, I thought immediately of the alleged OKC bombing ("alleged" only because of later evidence discounting the storyline). See A Noble Lie documentary that absolutely ruled out the govt's original version according to conflicting first responders & eyewitness accounts & material evidence. And I also am originally from OK & had family in the metro area when it happened. So synching up the govt's account with the actual on-the-ground version was impossible.
> The Oklahoma City bombing was a domestic terrorist truck bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, on April 19, 1995. (Tim McVeigh didn't do it.) It was the deadliest act of terrorism in U.S. history until the September 11 attacks in 2001 surpassed it.
From investigative evidence since then, clearly the first NYC WTC Bombing on Feb 26,1993; the OKC Bombing on April 19, 1995 & the Boston Marathon Bombing on April 15, 2013 were all false flags leading up to the BIG 9/11 Lie carried out on Sept 11, 2001. How exactly did WTC Building 7 collapse?
> Robert Kennedy Jr. picks a terrible week in American history to announce his presidential campaign
Sarah K. Burris- April 16, 2023, 4:18 PM ET -
https://www.rawstory.com/robert-kennedy-jr-bad-announcement-date/
Excerpt: "Robert Kennedy Jr. is announcing his 2024 presidential campaign on April 19, which was once known for the "shot heard around the world." It was when gunfire broke out in Lexington and Concord, sparking the start of the American Revolution. The colonists began a long and bloody war with the British for independence. While it ended well for the United States, it also meant the then-small country lost many of its citizens."
"Today the date means something else for many others, however. April 19 was the final day of the Waco stand off in which ATF and FBI agents moved in to put teargas in the house. A fire was started, which ended with the 76 Branch Davidians cult members killed, including 25 children who were the result of cult leader David Koresh impregnating several young women and minors on the compound."
"Two years after Waco, an anti-government, pro-gun veteran detonated a bomb at the U.S. federal building offices in Oklahoma City, killing 168 people, including 19 children. He did it because there were ATF agents in the building that were also in Waco."
"The five days between April 15 and 20 are some of the worst in American history. Not only did that week contain the OKC bombing and the end of the Waco stand off, but the Boston Marathon Bombing was also on April 15, the mass shooting at Virginia Tech on April 16, and the Columbine massacre on April 20."
Holy moley, Eric. How's that for planned synchronicity & masonic tinkering w/US emotional traumas??
oh dear...and hitler's birthday is 4/20...