What I would DEFINITELY LOVE to know is how you can BOTH say that vilogogy is not actually a science ~ with which I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH ~ yet you SEEM to believe in "astrology."
If "astrology" is a "science," THEN how is astrology FALSIFIABLE?
I anxiously await your explanation, if it forthcoming?
Just listened to this on my evening walk…it was quite interesting. I have listened to Sam & Mark Bailey, Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman and ‘no such thing as a virus’ theory. I tend to lean into their camp, as opposed to SARS Cov2 believers. But what has been eluding me in all my ‘listenings’ is what is actually causing ‘sickness’ in people? I know in the Case of the EUA mRNA Jabs, folks, their ‘sickness’ is likely related to those injections.
But what about people who chose not to go that route, (like myself) but still became ill with a serious ‘illness’ in 2022 and in late December into January. An ‘illness’ the first go around that lasted three weeks, had distinct ‘symptoms’ each week, which were not like any cold or flu symptoms I have ever had before. (Had not had the flu in 14 years, a cold here or there but that’s about it.) So what caused me to become sick?
5G, constant chem trail spraying where I live in SoCA, shedding from all the zombie vaxxed people I’m around when I’m out and about each day? That is my question!
Already collating. By the way, Eric. It's Derrick Broze (with R), not Boze. Although Boze is much better. Maybe you're thinking "Why does this Bozo keep turning up?"
Short 8 min clip, our beloved Derick Broze again, with Katherine Austin Fits. At 1:20 Katherine speaks. I don't know if this one fits your request, because Fits doesn't attack the non-virus thing (she loves Rappoport and Cowan), except saying it's a tiny subset of a bigger problem. Derrick comes off much worse than her. But I'm curious about your take on what Fits says there.
By now, you’ve probably heard the theory that there are no viruses, period. That the entire field of virology is a hoax, and that what we perceive as viruses are merely a type of cellular debris being shed when your body is trying to detox. Having delved deep into the science of infectious disease, Humphries disagrees with this theory. Viruses do exist. The question is whether they’re as dangerous as they’re made out to be."
It's really weird that Suzanne Humphries conflated contagion with quackcine contamination - which might be labelled "SV40" but has nothing to do with a "virus". And how she thinks that having an illness only once is evidence that it was caused by a virus. And how she thinks getting sick means you "caught" something.
Whitney Webb - too 'understudied' to say anything meaningful about the 'virus - no virus position'...ha ha ha ha. Well, Whitney, I am a very simple machine operator in a very simple factory, I left school at the age of 15 and I can follow the arguments and all the relevant information quite easily. It is not complicated at all Whitney. By the end of February 2020 I was already telling people the damn thing (Covid 19) was all a big hoax, so clear it was. Isn't Catherine Fitts also giving us the same message - too understudied on the subject to say anything about it? Sure guys, nice excuses. I think Samantha Bailey said it quite correctly in a recent video: we have to embrace these facts (in this case, viruses have never ever been proven to exist) and it is the only way to go forward.
I think we all owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to you, Eric, for your huge commitment to uncovering the reality behind awful pollutants and for your meticulous and outstanding work on the absence of science behind virology. Also for your 'covid' timeline., a tremendous resource, and for the great job you did on Purnima Wagh which saved a huge amount of embarrassment in the long run. However, I have problems with this current approach, which looks like 'going after' certain podcasters or influencers in an ad hominem fashion.
First of all, I fail to perceive any 'Health Freedom Movement'. I think it's a myth. I know a lot of people on 'our side' seem to waste an inordinate amount of time arguing the toss with idiots on Twitter/X and they appear to have no problem feeding the AI behemoth with data and arguments which will be vacuumed up by the likes (presumably) of ChatGPT. It worries me that so many otherwise good thinkers get drawn into this trap.
To me, the dodgy output of the likes of Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Joseph Mercola, Steve Kirsch, Geert Vanden Bossche etc is fair game if subject to reasoned argument. However, who actually cares what James Corbett, whose ego could well interest you astronomically. Whitney Webb. whose focus is corruption and geopolitics, and Derek B(r)oze who seems to resort to abuse at the drop of a hat, have to say about Terrain Theory or the missing virus? Even I tune out fast and I think your presentation strays perilously close to providing ammunition for those (should they be real commentators and not bots) who drone on about the 'no virus crowd' screaming and shouting at them.
A good angle might be to examine the commonality of 'their' arguments. It's as if they're reading a script ('division', 'crazy', 'house-of-cards', 'chicken-pox parties', measles, 'crowd' and so on.) There are a few more people taking notice of these charlatans now and we must not stop arguing for the no-virus position but let's not play the bastards' game by their rules!
I listened to it yesterday. 2/19/24: This After Talk with former pharmaceutical R&D executive Sasha Latypova is the best intelligence tutorial you could ever get on identifying those who are controlled paid agents of confusion and protect yourself. A first...and an exclusive of The Dr. Jane Ruby Show!
TALK WITH SASHA LATYPOVA- the video below with Sasha who shows mad skill at bringing the missing virus issue into the conversation without using confrontation. Give a listen. Jim
During the Plandemic, I had recurring daydream images of the OJ Simpson trial time, every day/night there was new info for months...., repeating the film of the "White Bronco" chase on the freeway, etc.. . Over and over again. More recently we got the cartoon spikey balls (Covid Spikey Ball with colours) coming at us every hour of the day via TV/computer/newspapers and mags. Again and again. How could one think that it isn't real??? We are all blasted with the images.... and I did not have a tv at the time!
The virus' origination theory was created in 1909 in order to for the masses to be afraid of, convinced of, and then of course receive the AMA treatments.
Virology was a hoax from the beginning. Flexner wrote that the virus must exist (poliemyelitis) because they couldn't find anything with their microscope.
"They (Flexner and Lewis) asserted: “Therefore, …the infecting agent of epidemic poliomyelitis belongs to the class of the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.“ Therefore?
WTF?
I was looking for an F. William Engdahl paper recently to send to a friend, but found it here in Azra Dale's substack. He adds a little from the recent "polio" scare in the UK and subsequent vaxxxes for the younger ones. Arggggg.... Disgusting. Great short reading.
I LOVE your perspicatious FOCUS on CRUCIAL "detail." (NOT mere "detail," of course.)
My ONLY contribution, which I DO consider MUCH MORE than mere "detail," as well ~ is that ~ FOR ME, in any case
It IS possible to BOTH embrace one's "tribe" as does Mercola, & Co.
AND
EMPHASIZE your CRUCIAL point (that virology IS A TOTAL SCAM: NO QUESTION!)!
But then, you DO, in effect, do that. IMO.
NEVERTHELESS, again:
I EMBRACE what you're saying AS WELL, AS WELL.
For me, it IS possible: I'm DOING IT ~ It is possible to EMBRACE "all of the above."
So, yes, one CAN emphasize your CRUCIAL points AND concede that we live in a tribal world, and that it does require some concessions, at times, etc., etc.
Basically, I DO believe that everything you said, here, needs to be said, as well, as well:
Eric,
What I would DEFINITELY LOVE to know is how you can BOTH say that vilogogy is not actually a science ~ with which I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH ~ yet you SEEM to believe in "astrology."
If "astrology" is a "science," THEN how is astrology FALSIFIABLE?
I anxiously await your explanation, if it forthcoming?
Thank you.
~ Sky ~
Just listened to this on my evening walk…it was quite interesting. I have listened to Sam & Mark Bailey, Tom Cowan and Andrew Kaufman and ‘no such thing as a virus’ theory. I tend to lean into their camp, as opposed to SARS Cov2 believers. But what has been eluding me in all my ‘listenings’ is what is actually causing ‘sickness’ in people? I know in the Case of the EUA mRNA Jabs, folks, their ‘sickness’ is likely related to those injections.
But what about people who chose not to go that route, (like myself) but still became ill with a serious ‘illness’ in 2022 and in late December into January. An ‘illness’ the first go around that lasted three weeks, had distinct ‘symptoms’ each week, which were not like any cold or flu symptoms I have ever had before. (Had not had the flu in 14 years, a cold here or there but that’s about it.) So what caused me to become sick?
5G, constant chem trail spraying where I live in SoCA, shedding from all the zombie vaxxed people I’m around when I’m out and about each day? That is my question!
Already collating. By the way, Eric. It's Derrick Broze (with R), not Boze. Although Boze is much better. Maybe you're thinking "Why does this Bozo keep turning up?"
Short 8 min clip, our beloved Derick Broze again, with Katherine Austin Fits. At 1:20 Katherine speaks. I don't know if this one fits your request, because Fits doesn't attack the non-virus thing (she loves Rappoport and Cowan), except saying it's a tiny subset of a bigger problem. Derrick comes off much worse than her. But I'm curious about your take on what Fits says there.
New from Mercola and Humphries:
"Are Viruses Real?
By now, you’ve probably heard the theory that there are no viruses, period. That the entire field of virology is a hoax, and that what we perceive as viruses are merely a type of cellular debris being shed when your body is trying to detox. Having delved deep into the science of infectious disease, Humphries disagrees with this theory. Viruses do exist. The question is whether they’re as dangerous as they’re made out to be."
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2024/02/25/dissolving-illusions-vaccines.aspx
It's really weird that Suzanne Humphries conflated contagion with quackcine contamination - which might be labelled "SV40" but has nothing to do with a "virus". And how she thinks that having an illness only once is evidence that it was caused by a virus. And how she thinks getting sick means you "caught" something.
This was a comment by Merrie Sloan at the page of yesterday's program.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DquL8U6mB7Ob at five minutes Broze actually mentions FOIAs in his set up question for McCullough.
Great podcast. They are so locked into the mainstream model that questioning the core assumptions could jeopardize their entire belief system.
A song about the fraud of Virology. Watch THE DISH. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/new-music-video-the-dish
Whitney Webb - too 'understudied' to say anything meaningful about the 'virus - no virus position'...ha ha ha ha. Well, Whitney, I am a very simple machine operator in a very simple factory, I left school at the age of 15 and I can follow the arguments and all the relevant information quite easily. It is not complicated at all Whitney. By the end of February 2020 I was already telling people the damn thing (Covid 19) was all a big hoax, so clear it was. Isn't Catherine Fitts also giving us the same message - too understudied on the subject to say anything about it? Sure guys, nice excuses. I think Samantha Bailey said it quite correctly in a recent video: we have to embrace these facts (in this case, viruses have never ever been proven to exist) and it is the only way to go forward.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/its-a-bird-its-a-plane-its-superchem
Some useful stuff on Latypova. Her and her husband have some interesting
companies; with some quite juicy links and contracts, to what would appear
to be: the very corporations/Government Depts, who locked-down our
sorry asses, in the first place.....
Check this out as well: more on Latypova's esoteric manoeuvrings.
PS. not a quick read; bookmark it and dive in later. you guys may have
read and digested this already. May be not for eveyone. Whatever !!
https://dpl003.substack.com/p/the-gatekeepers-club?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I think we all owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to you, Eric, for your huge commitment to uncovering the reality behind awful pollutants and for your meticulous and outstanding work on the absence of science behind virology. Also for your 'covid' timeline., a tremendous resource, and for the great job you did on Purnima Wagh which saved a huge amount of embarrassment in the long run. However, I have problems with this current approach, which looks like 'going after' certain podcasters or influencers in an ad hominem fashion.
First of all, I fail to perceive any 'Health Freedom Movement'. I think it's a myth. I know a lot of people on 'our side' seem to waste an inordinate amount of time arguing the toss with idiots on Twitter/X and they appear to have no problem feeding the AI behemoth with data and arguments which will be vacuumed up by the likes (presumably) of ChatGPT. It worries me that so many otherwise good thinkers get drawn into this trap.
To me, the dodgy output of the likes of Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, Joseph Mercola, Steve Kirsch, Geert Vanden Bossche etc is fair game if subject to reasoned argument. However, who actually cares what James Corbett, whose ego could well interest you astronomically. Whitney Webb. whose focus is corruption and geopolitics, and Derek B(r)oze who seems to resort to abuse at the drop of a hat, have to say about Terrain Theory or the missing virus? Even I tune out fast and I think your presentation strays perilously close to providing ammunition for those (should they be real commentators and not bots) who drone on about the 'no virus crowd' screaming and shouting at them.
A good angle might be to examine the commonality of 'their' arguments. It's as if they're reading a script ('division', 'crazy', 'house-of-cards', 'chicken-pox parties', measles, 'crowd' and so on.) There are a few more people taking notice of these charlatans now and we must not stop arguing for the no-virus position but let's not play the bastards' game by their rules!
The 9-ll segments were excellent, by the way.
I listened to it yesterday. 2/19/24: This After Talk with former pharmaceutical R&D executive Sasha Latypova is the best intelligence tutorial you could ever get on identifying those who are controlled paid agents of confusion and protect yourself. A first...and an exclusive of The Dr. Jane Ruby Show!
TALK WITH SASHA LATYPOVA- the video below with Sasha who shows mad skill at bringing the missing virus issue into the conversation without using confrontation. Give a listen. Jim
https://rumble.com/v4ee920-after-talk-with-sasha-latypova-identifying-controlled-opposition.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Iain McGilchrist writes that the right brain has the bigger picture outlook and also has the role of devil's advocate.
He implies that the current Western culture is a left hemisphere thinking one.
(I write this as Eric a couple of times I think mentioned left brain thinking.)
Thanks Eric.
During the Plandemic, I had recurring daydream images of the OJ Simpson trial time, every day/night there was new info for months...., repeating the film of the "White Bronco" chase on the freeway, etc.. . Over and over again. More recently we got the cartoon spikey balls (Covid Spikey Ball with colours) coming at us every hour of the day via TV/computer/newspapers and mags. Again and again. How could one think that it isn't real??? We are all blasted with the images.... and I did not have a tv at the time!
The virus' origination theory was created in 1909 in order to for the masses to be afraid of, convinced of, and then of course receive the AMA treatments.
Virology was a hoax from the beginning. Flexner wrote that the virus must exist (poliemyelitis) because they couldn't find anything with their microscope.
"They (Flexner and Lewis) asserted: “Therefore, …the infecting agent of epidemic poliomyelitis belongs to the class of the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.“ Therefore?
WTF?
I was looking for an F. William Engdahl paper recently to send to a friend, but found it here in Azra Dale's substack. He adds a little from the recent "polio" scare in the UK and subsequent vaxxxes for the younger ones. Arggggg.... Disgusting. Great short reading.
https://azradale.substack.com/p/toxicology-vs-virology-rockefeller
Hi Eric,
WAY AWESOME BROADCAST!
I LOVE your perspicatious FOCUS on CRUCIAL "detail." (NOT mere "detail," of course.)
My ONLY contribution, which I DO consider MUCH MORE than mere "detail," as well ~ is that ~ FOR ME, in any case
It IS possible to BOTH embrace one's "tribe" as does Mercola, & Co.
AND
EMPHASIZE your CRUCIAL point (that virology IS A TOTAL SCAM: NO QUESTION!)!
But then, you DO, in effect, do that. IMO.
NEVERTHELESS, again:
I EMBRACE what you're saying AS WELL, AS WELL.
For me, it IS possible: I'm DOING IT ~ It is possible to EMBRACE "all of the above."
So, yes, one CAN emphasize your CRUCIAL points AND concede that we live in a tribal world, and that it does require some concessions, at times, etc., etc.
Basically, I DO believe that everything you said, here, needs to be said, as well, as well:
No Question.
No Question.
AND Very Well Said, As Well.
Stay Way Awesome!
~ Sky ~