Also you are misunderstanding something about Christine's work. She is not trying to establish the existence of the virus. Follow me here, all caps: SHE IS WORKING TO ASCERTAIN THE BASIS BY WHICH PUBLIC HEALTH AUTHORITIES DECLARED THE EMERGENCY OF A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS. Period. Neither she nor I care if the virus exists as some kind of abstract entity. We care about the reason that the governments SHUT DOWN THE WORLD but cannot provide evidence supporting THE CLAIM THAT THEY MADE -- OF A VIRUS THAT INFECTS PEOPLE. AND IF THE VIRUS CANNOT BE FOUND INTACT IN A PERSON, AND IT CANNOT THEREFORE BE TESTED FOR, THEN WHY WERE 4.4 BILLION PEOPLE PUT UNDER MARTIAL LAW?
It's the answer I give when I'm writing two articles on a short deadline. The databases are spiked. Of course they are going to tell you it's "SARS-CoV-2." The question we are asking is: where is the original? Where is the actual virus against which you can compare and say: this is the master copy? It does not exist. And this is the problem. A very serious one at that.
and Lanka is correct; the metagenomics programs are assembling garbage and calling it a "coronavirus." but when you read the story of how the Ren team assembled 402123, the actual first sequence published, you will see what a heap of corporate garbage this all is.
An in silico database search cannot provide scientific evidence of a virus, lol. Read the Methods in a "virus sequencing" paper. Virologists don't apply scientific method and they don't sequence viruses. They make wild ridiculous assumptions, declare they have a "virus", and assemble genetic fragments of unknown provenance into a longer sequence, fraudulently labelling it a "virus genome", and upload those meaningless codes into your trusted databases.
check his interview with David Crowe. I think we made a transcript of that and put it in the chronology тАФ it was early on тАФ much more revealing тАФ it was earlier on and he was more honest with Crowe than he was with me but David knew a fuck ton more than I did...search "crowe"
well, he screwed the pooch with me about three different times. he blew the whole Eurosurveillance thing...admitted he was going into the testing business...etc
Bit late, don't you think, for an alleged virus that supposedly crossed the planet 3 years ago, with millions of "confirmed cases" of infection? LOL. Seriously, I do not care what is in your database, when no one has any science showing that any of it came from a virus.
Here is your "Wuhan original" - Fan Wu, in truth the second claimed sequence.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
This is MN908947, a fraudulent claimed partial in silico sequencing of the N-gene. This is not a virus, it's a bad joke.
I researched this and found a source. There is an answer. And the answer is not "real virus."
Also you are misunderstanding something about Christine's work. She is not trying to establish the existence of the virus. Follow me here, all caps: SHE IS WORKING TO ASCERTAIN THE BASIS BY WHICH PUBLIC HEALTH AUTHORITIES DECLARED THE EMERGENCY OF A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS. Period. Neither she nor I care if the virus exists as some kind of abstract entity. We care about the reason that the governments SHUT DOWN THE WORLD but cannot provide evidence supporting THE CLAIM THAT THEY MADE -- OF A VIRUS THAT INFECTS PEOPLE. AND IF THE VIRUS CANNOT BE FOUND INTACT IN A PERSON, AND IT CANNOT THEREFORE BE TESTED FOR, THEN WHY WERE 4.4 BILLION PEOPLE PUT UNDER MARTIAL LAW?
I am putting the onus on these institutions to prove their claims! They can't, and the virus is clearly made-up and imaginary :)
It's the answer I give when I'm writing two articles on a short deadline. The databases are spiked. Of course they are going to tell you it's "SARS-CoV-2." The question we are asking is: where is the original? Where is the actual virus against which you can compare and say: this is the master copy? It does not exist. And this is the problem. A very serious one at that.
and Lanka is correct; the metagenomics programs are assembling garbage and calling it a "coronavirus." but when you read the story of how the Ren team assembled 402123, the actual first sequence published, you will see what a heap of corporate garbage this all is.
An in silico database search cannot provide scientific evidence of a virus, lol. Read the Methods in a "virus sequencing" paper. Virologists don't apply scientific method and they don't sequence viruses. They make wild ridiculous assumptions, declare they have a "virus", and assemble genetic fragments of unknown provenance into a longer sequence, fraudulently labelling it a "virus genome", and upload those meaningless codes into your trusted databases.
Or maybe they're god...
Lol, great summary!!
check his interview with David Crowe. I think we made a transcript of that and put it in the chronology тАФ it was early on тАФ much more revealing тАФ it was earlier on and he was more honest with Crowe than he was with me but David knew a fuck ton more than I did...search "crowe"
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/covid-chronology-5.2.0.pdf
https://audio.pwfm.tech/documents/200414-crowe-bustin-interview.pdf
well, he screwed the pooch with me about three different times. he blew the whole Eurosurveillance thing...admitted he was going into the testing business...etc
Mongol, what is the source of the primers? What is the amplicion actually pointing back to?
Bit late, don't you think, for an alleged virus that supposedly crossed the planet 3 years ago, with millions of "confirmed cases" of infection? LOL. Seriously, I do not care what is in your database, when no one has any science showing that any of it came from a virus.
Who cares, when no one has any science showing that any osequence came from something fitting the definition of a virus?
It's all Fantasy Football. There is no actual game; there are no actual players.
No one cares about sequences unless you can show they came from a "virus".