Also, Sherry Tenpenny, who publishes you, believes viruses exist. Also, Suzanne Humphries believes viruses exist. The people who made the virus-denying arguments you parrot are playing for the Dark Side. And getting rich and famous.
Also, Sherry Tenpenny, who publishes you, believes viruses exist. Also, Suzanne Humphries believes viruses exist. The people who made the virus-denying arguments you parrot are playing for the Dark Side. And getting rich and famous.
I dearly love Sherri Tenpenny. She has helped hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, with her messages and information about the harms of "vaccination." I have not spoken to her lately. I am not sure if she has been able to review the work of Lanka, Cowan, and Kaufman.
I have never spoken to Dr. Humphries. Hopefully, she too, will advance her thinking and understanding with more information. Unlike other allopaths, Dr. Humphries has demonstrated a willingness to look beyond dogma.
But I do not parrot the works of those who show that virology is unscientific, and filled with unfalsifiable claims and empty rhetoric. Rather, I have reviewed the original works of Iwanowski, Flexner, Enders, Rivers, Koch, Jenner, and more. Once a person reads the disgusting practices wherein they torture animals, or just poison chicken embryos, or humans, it is easy to see that germ theory, and claims about exogenous viruses and the efficacy of vaccines are silly and or dangerous.
Lastly, I wish nothing but the best for Cowan, and the Baileys, Lanka, et alia. Better that they get money, than Pfizer, Gates, Fauci, and others who promote death and poisoning.
Then again, you can always take the Offit challenge: 10,000 vaccines at one time (Pediatrics 2002, volume 109: 124-129). Please prove how good the shots are. We will wait for your press conference and demonstration.
Again, viruses exist; vaccines are made from viruses. The so-called denatured viruses are re-vivifying in the wild. If viruses don't exist, where does polio vaccine come from? Why does it re-vivify and paralyze children?
The portion of the sars cov-2 virus used as the pattern for the mRNA vaccines produces the same pathologies of the wild virus. Thus fulfilling Koch's postulate, but in an amplified way. Just a portion, isolated, amplified, transfected - and you get 20+ victims dead of a mad-cow like disease within a month. CJD typically takes years.
In general, best to disbelieve Cowan and believe the CIA. They've put their money into making hellish weapons.
Here is some of the science [sic] of polio virus (and note, these men presupposed that they had found some mythical virus - even though they could not see it or filter it):
From Flexner and Lewis (1912):
"The precise manner in which microorganisms enter the body through mucous membranes is difficult to establish."
(Note, they defined poliomyelitis virus as microorganisms, i.e., living things, akin to bacteria. Such is NOT the present-day, post 1955, definition)
"In experimental poliomyelitis produced by any method of injection, it is well known that the virus [sic] is present throughout the central nervous system."
(Here they use the term "experimental poliomyelitis" to mean paralysis and or death. Thus, the men could inject matter into monkeys and harm the animals. Such is NOT evidence of natural transmission of a pathogen.
Because the animals went lame, post injection, Flexner and Lewis declared that the paralysis was due to some mythical virus, in the central nervous system. The only obvious thing was that the humans poisoned the animals, via injection - hardly proof of a contagious virus),
Now they get more graphic about their cruelty.
"the nasal mucous membrane of a Macacus rhesus monkey was swabbed lightly with a portion of ground cord from a recently paralyzed monkey. The monkey was killed at the end of 48 hours and the [various] portions of the central nervous system were removed ... These different portions were injected separately, as suspensions, into the brain and peritoneal cavity of three other Macacus rhesus monkeys.
The monkey injected with the suspension of the olfactory lobes came down in a manner typical of poliomyelitis in monkeys, with definite prodromal symptoms on the ninth day, paralysis on the tenth and death on the twelfth day. At autopsy, lesions characteristic of the disease were observed throughout the [spinal] cord. The two other monkeys remained entirely well and have never shown any symptoms of paralysis. The result of this experiment is definite."
(So those butchers ground up spinal cords and brains of monkeys, and then INJECTED that material into other monkeys - one of which became paralyzed. Yet as two others were not paralyzed, Flexner and Lewis concluded that they knew where to find polio "virus." None of these torture practices proved the existence of virus. Nothing was isolated. They injected foreign proteins directly into the brains or upper abdominal areas of monkeys.)
"Vaccines" are not made from viruses. Wait, are you "taking the piss", again?
In banking, this would be fraud. If an EMT did this, they would get arrested. If a cop did the equivalent, it would be national news. This virology shit is a work of total fraud, and worse, it covers up how the real issues all involve toxins.
Re: Polio; Symptoms & timeline coincide with comprehensive DDT & Lead Arsenic spraying - a virus is the cover story to protect the liable state agencies, regulators & industrialists, they stopped spraying at the same time the vaccine was released - bingo, the cure!.
For the future reader - Christine actually clicked on at least one of the links to a study and responded in a separate post. This reply here must be an old post.
But the one I scanned to see their isolation process described in detail was near the top, Dulbecco and Vogt, click through to the pdf.
IMHO Christine responded to the study with derision above, and since the study elaborated their process in great detail, Christine responded inappropriately here.
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS).--(a) NaC1 8.0 gm., KC1 0.2 gm., Na~-IPO4 1.15 gin. KH~PO4 0.2 gr., water 800 ml.; (b) CaC12 0.1 gin., water 100 ml.; (c) MgCI2.6H20 0.1 gm.. water 100 ml. Autoclave (a), (b), and (c) separately; mix when cooled. Trypsin (Nutritiona; Biochemical Co.) 0.25 per cent in PBS, sterilized by filtration.
Tissue Culture Fluid.--Earle's saline (ES) (3), 8 parts, horse serum, 6 parts, chicken embryo extract (1:1 in ES), 3 parts; Earle's saline and horse serum were sterilized by pressure filtration through a Selas falter of porosity 03; the embryo extract was prepared under sterile conditions. An amount of 100/~g. of streptomycin and 100 units of penicillin per ml. were added to the saline solutions."
So in Todd's opinion, mixing so-called "poliomyelitis virus" AKA "a 20 per cent suspension of spinal cord of rhesus monkey" (not purified particles suspected of being a "virus") in a lab dish with monkey kidneys/testes, protein-digesting trypsin, horse serum, chicken embryo extract, streptomycin and penicillin, ETC., and then observing plaque formation is supposed to confirm something or other about the "virus" that was ass-umed to exist and to be present in the monkey spinal cord suspension. No need for a valid independent variable. Or controls. Or logic. Because "science".
The control was the cell culture itself. It was non-infected, virus was added, it became infected (plaques formed)
So for example , you twist your streeing wheel to the left. Your car goes left. That proves there is a repeatable mechanism between the steering wheel and the tires. The tools of RCT are not always needed. Every scientific tool does not need to be applied in every case. Economy of argument is more impactful.
The healthy cell culture prior to infection was itself the control.
Also, Sherry Tenpenny, who publishes you, believes viruses exist. Also, Suzanne Humphries believes viruses exist. The people who made the virus-denying arguments you parrot are playing for the Dark Side. And getting rich and famous.
Dear Todd Harvey,
I dearly love Sherri Tenpenny. She has helped hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people, with her messages and information about the harms of "vaccination." I have not spoken to her lately. I am not sure if she has been able to review the work of Lanka, Cowan, and Kaufman.
I have never spoken to Dr. Humphries. Hopefully, she too, will advance her thinking and understanding with more information. Unlike other allopaths, Dr. Humphries has demonstrated a willingness to look beyond dogma.
But I do not parrot the works of those who show that virology is unscientific, and filled with unfalsifiable claims and empty rhetoric. Rather, I have reviewed the original works of Iwanowski, Flexner, Enders, Rivers, Koch, Jenner, and more. Once a person reads the disgusting practices wherein they torture animals, or just poison chicken embryos, or humans, it is easy to see that germ theory, and claims about exogenous viruses and the efficacy of vaccines are silly and or dangerous.
Lastly, I wish nothing but the best for Cowan, and the Baileys, Lanka, et alia. Better that they get money, than Pfizer, Gates, Fauci, and others who promote death and poisoning.
Then again, you can always take the Offit challenge: 10,000 vaccines at one time (Pediatrics 2002, volume 109: 124-129). Please prove how good the shots are. We will wait for your press conference and demonstration.
Best
Again, viruses exist; vaccines are made from viruses. The so-called denatured viruses are re-vivifying in the wild. If viruses don't exist, where does polio vaccine come from? Why does it re-vivify and paralyze children?
The portion of the sars cov-2 virus used as the pattern for the mRNA vaccines produces the same pathologies of the wild virus. Thus fulfilling Koch's postulate, but in an amplified way. Just a portion, isolated, amplified, transfected - and you get 20+ victims dead of a mad-cow like disease within a month. CJD typically takes years.
In general, best to disbelieve Cowan and believe the CIA. They've put their money into making hellish weapons.
Dear Todd Harvey,
Here is some of the science [sic] of polio virus (and note, these men presupposed that they had found some mythical virus - even though they could not see it or filter it):
From Flexner and Lewis (1912):
"The precise manner in which microorganisms enter the body through mucous membranes is difficult to establish."
(Note, they defined poliomyelitis virus as microorganisms, i.e., living things, akin to bacteria. Such is NOT the present-day, post 1955, definition)
"In experimental poliomyelitis produced by any method of injection, it is well known that the virus [sic] is present throughout the central nervous system."
(Here they use the term "experimental poliomyelitis" to mean paralysis and or death. Thus, the men could inject matter into monkeys and harm the animals. Such is NOT evidence of natural transmission of a pathogen.
Because the animals went lame, post injection, Flexner and Lewis declared that the paralysis was due to some mythical virus, in the central nervous system. The only obvious thing was that the humans poisoned the animals, via injection - hardly proof of a contagious virus),
Now they get more graphic about their cruelty.
"the nasal mucous membrane of a Macacus rhesus monkey was swabbed lightly with a portion of ground cord from a recently paralyzed monkey. The monkey was killed at the end of 48 hours and the [various] portions of the central nervous system were removed ... These different portions were injected separately, as suspensions, into the brain and peritoneal cavity of three other Macacus rhesus monkeys.
The monkey injected with the suspension of the olfactory lobes came down in a manner typical of poliomyelitis in monkeys, with definite prodromal symptoms on the ninth day, paralysis on the tenth and death on the twelfth day. At autopsy, lesions characteristic of the disease were observed throughout the [spinal] cord. The two other monkeys remained entirely well and have never shown any symptoms of paralysis. The result of this experiment is definite."
(So those butchers ground up spinal cords and brains of monkeys, and then INJECTED that material into other monkeys - one of which became paralyzed. Yet as two others were not paralyzed, Flexner and Lewis concluded that they knew where to find polio "virus." None of these torture practices proved the existence of virus. Nothing was isolated. They injected foreign proteins directly into the brains or upper abdominal areas of monkeys.)
"Vaccines" are not made from viruses. Wait, are you "taking the piss", again?
Best
In banking, this would be fraud. If an EMT did this, they would get arrested. If a cop did the equivalent, it would be national news. This virology shit is a work of total fraud, and worse, it covers up how the real issues all involve toxins.
https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/how-we-got-here-the-history-of-pcbs
Re: Polio; Symptoms & timeline coincide with comprehensive DDT & Lead Arsenic spraying - a virus is the cover story to protect the liable state agencies, regulators & industrialists, they stopped spraying at the same time the vaccine was released - bingo, the cure!.
Who cares what people say? Cite a valid scientific study.
For the future reader - Christine actually clicked on at least one of the links to a study and responded in a separate post. This reply here must be an old post.
Not a valid, scientific study, Todd. Don't mislead people.
Here is what Christine says is not a valid study. Dulbecco and Vogt, (copied from above, and the reader can scroll up and judge her reply there)
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C43&q=poliomyelitis+virus+isolation&btnG=&oq=poliomyelitis+virus+is
But the one I scanned to see their isolation process described in detail was near the top, Dulbecco and Vogt, click through to the pdf.
IMHO Christine responded to the study with derision above, and since the study elaborated their process in great detail, Christine responded inappropriately here.
Lol, as I pointed out earlier:
From the 1st study at that link:
"Solutions and Media
Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS).--(a) NaC1 8.0 gm., KC1 0.2 gm., Na~-IPO4 1.15 gin. KH~PO4 0.2 gr., water 800 ml.; (b) CaC12 0.1 gin., water 100 ml.; (c) MgCI2.6H20 0.1 gm.. water 100 ml. Autoclave (a), (b), and (c) separately; mix when cooled. Trypsin (Nutritiona; Biochemical Co.) 0.25 per cent in PBS, sterilized by filtration.
Tissue Culture Fluid.--Earle's saline (ES) (3), 8 parts, horse serum, 6 parts, chicken embryo extract (1:1 in ES), 3 parts; Earle's saline and horse serum were sterilized by pressure filtration through a Selas falter of porosity 03; the embryo extract was prepared under sterile conditions. An amount of 100/~g. of streptomycin and 100 units of penicillin per ml. were added to the saline solutions."
So in Todd's opinion, mixing so-called "poliomyelitis virus" AKA "a 20 per cent suspension of spinal cord of rhesus monkey" (not purified particles suspected of being a "virus") in a lab dish with monkey kidneys/testes, protein-digesting trypsin, horse serum, chicken embryo extract, streptomycin and penicillin, ETC., and then observing plaque formation is supposed to confirm something or other about the "virus" that was ass-umed to exist and to be present in the monkey spinal cord suspension. No need for a valid independent variable. Or controls. Or logic. Because "science".
The control was the cell culture itself. It was non-infected, virus was added, it became infected (plaques formed)
So for example , you twist your streeing wheel to the left. Your car goes left. That proves there is a repeatable mechanism between the steering wheel and the tires. The tools of RCT are not always needed. Every scientific tool does not need to be applied in every case. Economy of argument is more impactful.
The healthy cell culture prior to infection was itself the control.
here is the pdf:
https://rupress.org/jem/article-pdf/99/2/167/1185313/167.pdf