Planet Waves FM is provided by Chiron Return, a federally-registered 501(c)(3) organization. We are part of the Pacifica Radio Network and accredited by the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ). Thank you for your donations and membership support.
This program always appears on PlanetWaves.FM.
Dear Friend and Listener:
Tonight’s theme is the quest for wholeness. We're joined by Colombian astrologer Beatriz Amanda, who describes her perspectives on Eris. I'm also joined by Rebecca Culshaw, who fills us in on the off-label use of pharmaceutical drugs.
And on Tantra Studio, I'll share a bit about my feminist journey, what I learned, and where I've ended up. That is on its own player as well.
For additional resources and documents related to tonight’s program — and to hear the different segments individually — please visit the program’s home page.
Those resources include the essay “Compulsory Heterosexuality” by Adrienne Rich and “My Sister Kate,” an interview with Mallory Millett.
Planet Waves - Chiron Return is a mission-based Substack. Our primary intention is to prepare journalists to do good work under digital conditions, and to help our readers and listeners orient themselves in the increasingly chaotic digital space.
Your subscriptions to this Substack go directly to tne nonprofit Chiron Return to cover the costs of production, broadcasting and publication. If you steward a charitable family trust and want to support our journalism mentorship program and our digital media literacy efforts, please reply to this email.
Thank you for your vision and your generosity.
Organic Love: An Ecology of Sustainable Relationship
Published on Planet Waves in February 2001; republished by Sexuality.org
By Eric Francis
We’re all familiar with organic food. This is food grown without pesticide sprays or toxic fertilizers, from natural seeds that have escaped genetic engineering. In theory, organic food has no synthetic preservatives or artificial dyes, nothing extra that it does not need (like plastic filler) and it’s handled in a way that preserves some of the integrity of what nature created. Due to crop loss, it’s expensive (though cheaper than restaurant food, which most of us eat a lot of).
But it’s better. Organic food is often sold closer to the natural growing times, and there are some philosophies of organic diet (Macrobiotics, for example) which suggest that we eat only food grown locally and when it’s in season. Most important, we think of organic food as whole food, rather than food which is fractioned off like white flour, or recombined to make weird things like fortified breakfast cereal or vitamin D skim milk.
The organic food philosophy (usually known in Europe as Biodynamics) honors the reality that both the land and people need to be healthier and the relationship between the two is food. There is an acknowledged connection between ecology (which means the “study of home”) and the health of the people who live in that home.
A concept at the core of organic eating is sustainability. We know that our current agricultural system is killing the planet and making us sick; we know that most of the foods available in the supermarket lack basic nutrition. Organic farming, Biodynamics and other philosophies show how we can sustain both human life and planetary life through one process.
We also know that the society’s teachings about relationships, which glorify possession of other people, which rely on artificial structures, and which are usually based on oppressive, negative ideas, are harming us, and damaging health of the planet, just as aggressively as agribusiness. Unfulfilled, emotionally undernourished people an be risky to the happiness of others, especially when they grow angry and spread emotional toxins. And this is most of what we get in the world when we enter the human environment.
So, what about organic love?
Toxic ideas about love, like toxic food, are sold in the supermarket, at the check-out counter. Flip through those magazines, or just look at the covers (who doesn’t?). They teach us to think in terms of ideas like “married” and “monogamous”; we can learn to please or be more pleasing to our partner; we can have affairs, which means lying and “cheating,” and there are instruction manuals for catching our partners in these activities. We read a lot about rape and violence, which are portrayed like sexy advertising. People are “gay” or “straight” and if they’re really wild, they’re “bisexual.” We tend to consume these ideas as unconsciously as we consume food containing polysorbate-80, hormone-tainted meat and sugar-packed soft drinks with laced with propylene glycol.
Over the past 40 or so years, several different relationship outlooks have added some diversity and allowed people to be more natural.
The polyamory movement is one of these. Polyamory (meaning more than one love) suggests that it’s natural for people to have more than one sexual relationship at a time. When you consider how many people do have more than one sexual relationship at a time (but deny it), then the real claim-to-fame of polyamory is that people are getting together and making a choice to face reality, and to be happier as who they are.
Polyamory has its own problems; for one thing it’s a kind of “movement” and not everybody wants to join a movement. Part of its movement quality, though, is based on the idea that this lifestyle requires support. Another problem with poly is that it’s based on the idea of “poly,” meaning more than one lover. What about people who want to have more natural relationships tending toward monogamy? Here, the notion of “polyamory” can alienate people who may otherwise have a lot else in common with poly folk.
Many people have observed that polyamorous relationships often have many of the same confusion and toxic issues as monogamous relationships, just spread out among more people. Some would say that this makes the weirdness worse, and others would say that expanded relationship models give us a chance to see the dynamics in action, and work them out openly (remembering how many people cheat).
It may be that so-called monogamy has problems, but that polyamory does not really address them because these problems reside closer to the core of who we are, and what we are trained to be in our society.
Without going into a long discourse on religion, most of our ideas about relationships are based on Christian metaphysics (God was born to a virgin and never had sex; and the love of God is more important than human love experienced in the body), which are then heavily overlaid with romantic ideals (such as the idea of finding a one-and-only erotic love, to the dismissal of all other loves) that send us spinning wildly in the other direction.
Combine this debate with natural hormone biology, and you can see all our conflict in and about relationships, from guilt to jealousy to cheating, as products of a war between two belief systems (religion versus romance) plus our naturally horny, delightfully curious human nature.
In witness to life, I offer a few ideas about how we might go about creating organic love.
All love starts with selflove. In order to love another person we need to be at peace with who we are, which means loving and appreciating ourselves-including sexually. Selfloving means being a whole person. If we bring this whole person into our relationships, we are likely to find greater peace and fulfillment. [Please see sidebar.]
Love requires trust in order to grow naturally. Trust is both intuitive and cultivated. In an atmosphere of trust, it is easier to feel safe enough to be oneself, which will allow greater expression in loving relationships-of love, fear and other emotions that we face.
People are naturally curious about one another. Can we deny this? Why bother? We need to allow for human nature in our human relationships. If we are with a beautiful person, we can presume that others will be curious and want to get close to that beauty; we can presume the same thing about ourselves.
People seem more beautiful when we are in love. And we seem more beautiful to them. When we are in love, we are love magnets. If we allow for this fact rather than trying to deny it, I believe we’ll be happier and live more naturally.
People really cannot be controlled; we are our own people. We can lie and act like we are controlled; we can kid ourselves and think we control another. Both are false rather than wrong. Once control has entered a relationship, it has filled in spaces where many other nutrients are lacking, such as trust, allowing, or selflove.
Relationships take their own form and each is different. Relationships grow, like plants; they are change as they become. We may go through different seasons of love, and might want one partner some years or some days, and more than one partner some years or some days.
Communication is a learned skill and is essential to relationships. Communication is based on honesty; honesty is a learned skill as well. We learned to lie in order to defend ourselves against deception, control and attack. In order to communicate honestly, we need to teach one another to do so patiently-within contexts that are free from deception, control and attack.
Our homes need to support our relationships. As our own people, we need our own spaces. It is much healthier for people to have safe retreats, a safe space to call their own. I suggest that in live-in, long-term relationships, people have their own rooms and their own beds, and invite one another as guests.
Sexual beings often make babies. Though the science of this was not understood until the late 19th century, we now know for sure that sex can lead to birth. We know that most pregnancies are unplanned, but there is no excuse for this. Men and women each need to take 100% responsibility for birth control, and for birth, as a matter of love for one another and for the unborn. We cannot always stop undesired pregnancy, but we can all accept responsibility for working to do so.
We are each responsible for our own healing of childhood wounding and past relationships.If we don’t, we will dump our toxic emotions, most of which began with our family of origin (blame, guilt, shame, resentment) onto our partners rather than dealing with them. Taking this responsibility would include each person in a relationship being on a conscious path of growth, whether spiritual or with a therapist of some kind: having a space outside the relationship to deal with one’s own life, including relationship experiences.
Jealousy is not what it seems to be, and to love organically we need to get to the heart of the matter. Jealousy is an expression of deep attachment, and to transcend it we must approach it as a natural erotic force, in a sense, as erotic pain. We are all of mortal flesh and will not be with our partners “forever.” But we can be with them in any one moment, which is all that there is anyway.++